Примеры использования Embargo policy на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
We emphasize that the embargo policy is not a bilateral affair.
The embargo policy also harms citizens of the United States and third countries.
This incident proves what an irrational andridiculous extent the embargo policy can reach.
However, the rejection of the embargo policy against Cuba and of its consequences are not confined to international forums.
Nevertheless, Cuban health-care services have been continuously threatened by the United States embargo policy.
Люди также переводят
The application of the embargo policy to the world of culture has deprived both countries of exchanges that have been exceedingly rich throughout history.
The Secretary General of Amnesty International, Irene Khan,said that the embargo policy was immoral and failed.
The declaration described the embargo policy as unjust and a major hindrance to Cuba's development and its recovery from global challenges such as the current economic crisis.
Since the revolutionary triumph in Cuba, the national health system has been a priority target of the United States embargo policy against the island.
As you know, the embargo policy against Cuba imposed by the Government of the United States of America for over 50 years is the primary obstacle to our people's development and well-being.
Not even the establishment of a new Democrat Administration in the United States of America, supposedly driven by a philosophy of change,has in fact led to any fundamental change in the embargo policy.
The embargo policy, imposed and subsequently strengthened by more than 10 United States administrations, is a concrete example that has had an appreciable negative impact on every aspect of the country's life.
Thirteen world-class firms, six of them from the United States, showed interest in carrying out projects in Cuba butdid not begin negotiations because of the obstacles raised by the embargo policy.
In a speech made on that day, he confirmed his embargo policy and announced"new measures", to which he added a call for the use of force to overthrow the Cuban constitutional Government.
Recently, following the adoption of resolution 52/10, that Government has maintained in force and strengthened the application of the laws anddecisions that make up its embargo policy against Cuba, including the well-known Torricelli and Helms-Burton Acts.
The embargo policy imposed and strengthened by 10 United States Administrations is a concrete example of such measures, whose repercussions have had serious negative effects on all spheres of the country's life.
The contents of this section confirm the harmful impact of the application of the embargo policy on the Cuban economy, and provide a picture of the difficulties, restrictions and sacrifices that the Cuban people have had to face for more than 45 years.
The embargo policy continues to hamper and sometimes prevents direct and normal relations with a series of international sports institutions, as well as the participation of athletes at major sporting events held in the United States or in Cuba.
Although the current United States Government has taken some positive steps, they are insufficient and extremely limited and are not intended to alter the complex fabric of law, regulations andprovisions that make up the embargo policy against Cuba.
The embargo policy is not a bilateral issue; it is extraterritorial in nature and violates international law and international trade regulations, despite the categorical international rejection of that policy. .
He added that the shortest cut to lifting the embargo would be to eliminate President Saddam Hussein as soon as possible andsaid that if Saddam Hussein's reign continued, the embargo policy would be maintained as a means of pressure.
The Republic of Belarus considers the further measures taken by the United States Government in May 2004 to tighten the embargo policy against Cuba to be a dangerous step not conducive to the strengthening of security and stability in the region and in the world as a whole.
The continued application of the embargo policy by the United States Government constitutes clear defiance of the majority opinion of the United States public and the values shared by the community of nations with regard to cultural, academic, scientific and sporting exchanges.
Despite intense and growing demands from the international community for the United States Government to change its policy on Cuba, lift the embargo and normalize bilateral relations,the Administration of President Obama has kept the embargo policy intact.
In the telephone communications sector, the embargo policy implemented since 1962 has aimed to deprive Cuba of the income derived from telephone traffic with the island and to prohibit the expansion, improvement and technological updating of the means of transmission.
He adds that the shortest way to the lifting of the embargo is the liquidation of President Saddam Hussein as soon as possible andthat, as long as the Saddam Hussein regime continues, the embargo policy will be maintained as a means of exerting pressure.
The embargo policy has obstructed the development of human capital, information technologies, the acquisition of equipment and material resources needed for scientific research, the transfer and development of technology, and the marketing of Cuban products, and other business dealings.
With respect to medicines, the United States Government has tried to manipulate the facts on various occasions by claiming that it does not apply an embargo policy, based on the provision made in the Torricelli Act for the granting of licences for the sale of medicines to Cuba.
The embargo policy has caused and continues to cause serious and massive damage to the material, physical and spiritual well-being of the Cuban people, and it has not only limited that people's economic and social development but has also forced successive generations of Cubans to live in a climate of constant hostility and tension.
The document explains why the United States cannot use the argument of the nationalizations of foreign property in Cuba to justify its embargo policy against the country, presenting it as an insurmountable obstacle to the rescission of the policy. .