Примеры использования Functional protection на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Functional protection of detained staff.
This is not to say that functional protection is not an important subject.
The present draft articles do not deal with the protection of an agent by an international organization,generally described as"functional protection.
Such functional protection was usually based on specific legal instruments.
He is particularly opposed to the inclusion of functional protection in the present study.
May functional protection be exercised against the State of nationality of the injured agent?
OSCE suggested that the Commission consider functional protection specifically A/CN.4/637, sect. II.B.19.
Such functional protection issues appeared to have the support of most members of the Commission and of the Committee.
The question whether it is possible to distinguish clearly between functional protection and diplomatic protection; .
Does functional protection extend to an injury to a United Nations official on paid vacation?
Consequently, the Agency was unable to exercise fully its right to functional protection of staff who were arrested and detained.
The right to functional protection should be justified by the need to ensure the independence of the international organization.
The protection of an agent of an international organization by the organization--"functional protection"-- raises special issues distinct from diplomatic protection.
Functional protection, on the other hand, is a method for promoting the efficient functioning of an international organization by ensuring respect for its agents.
Although there are similarities between functional protection and diplomatic protection, there are also important differences.
Functional protection, on the other hand, is an institution for promoting the efficient functioning of an international organization by ensuring respect for its agents and their independence.
Although there are similarities between functional protection and diplomatic protection, there are also important differences.
His delegation shared the view that the rule of nationality of claims did not apply to cases where international organizations exercised functional protection on behalf of their officials.
His delegation considered that functional protection was a form of protection governed by a special regime.
Inevitably there are important differences between traditional diplomatic protection by a State and functional protection exercised by an international organization.
The functional protection exercised by international organizations on behalf of their employees was a separate issue and should be discussed in another forum.
The situation could be even more complicated:the organization might wish to exercise its functional protection in respect of its agent against the State of his or her nationality.
In international jurisprudence, functional protection had been broadly based on the model of diplomatic protection, although certain specific elements had been naturally retained.
A more helpful method of reconciling competing claims might be to give priority to functional protection where it conflicts with diplomatic protection. .
To add such questions as functional protection of international officials by their organizations would further complicate an already difficult task and delay the outcome.
Geck, writing in the Encyclopaediaof Public International Law, presents a definition that takes account of developments relating to functional protection providing for agents of an international organization.
An international organization should be able to exercise functional protection on behalf of a person acting in its name in respect of any injury suffered during the performance of his or her duties.
The functional protection of officials of international organizations was an exception to the rule of link of nationality which underpinned the regime of diplomatic protection, and should therefore be excluded.
In terms of a further view,the distinction between diplomatic and functional protection did not necessarily apply in the context of diplomatic protection exercised on behalf of members of the armed services.
He therefore believed that,taking into account the relationship between the protection exercised by States and functional protection exercised by international organizations, the latter should be studied further.