Примеры использования Incompatibility of a reservation на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Incompatibility of a reservation with the.
In 2007 the Commission had adopted nine draft guidelines,which dealt with the determination of, and the incompatibility of a reservation with, the object and purpose of a treaty.
Incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty.
However, its contents remain vague(2) andthere is still some uncertainty as to the consequences of the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty 3.
Draft guideline 3.1.5 Incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty.
It was noted that the practical difficulty which accompanied the principle was diverse State practice on what was the appropriate test to determine the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of a treaty.
Still, the fact remained that the clarification of the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of a multilateral treaty and its ensuing consequences must be objective.
There were a number of unanswered questions with respect to the general regime of reservations and, in particular, with respect to the effects that a declaration of incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of a treaty might have.
The incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty stemmed not only from the effect of the reservation but also from the provision(s) to which it related.
It was also observed that the Vienna regime did not provide a mechanism for assessing the incompatibility of a reservation with the object or purpose of a treaty, nor did it indicate what body was competent to make such an assessment.
The incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty stemmed not only from the effect of the reservation but also from the provision(s) to which it related.
The Commission also adopted nine draft guidelines dealing with the determination of the object andpurpose of the treaty as well as the question of incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty together with commentaries chap. IV.
Nevertheless, the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of a multilateral treaty and the consequences resulting therefrom must be objective.
The special nature of human rights treaties was reflected in the test provided for in article 19(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties,which concerned the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty.
The incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of a treaty stems not only from the effect of the reservation but also from the treaty provision(s) to which it relates.
As the Special Rapporteur had recommended in his report,before a decision was taken on the consequences of the lack of validity or the incompatibility of a reservation, there should always be a discussion with the State concerned in the framework of a"reservation dialogue.
We note, however, that the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of a treaty may only become apparent, or established, many years from such a reservation being formulated, perhaps only in the context of litigation.
By contrast, the Human Rights Committee, in its General Comment No. 24, had claimed for itself the right to decide on the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and to refuse to accept the reservation. .
It must in any case be acknowledged that the travaux préparatoires of subparagraph(c) are confused anddo not offer any further indications of the consequences that the drafters of the Convention intended to draw from the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the Convention.
The difficulty of determining the compatibility or incompatibility of a reservation has led to a differentiated State approach to dealing with those reservations that do not meet the compatibility test.
During consideration of the report of the Commission on the work of its fifty-seventh session in 2005(A/60/10), Sweden,replying to the Commission's question regarding"minimum effect" objections based on the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty, expressly maintained this position.
In future reports, he would consider generally the issue of the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of a treaty and the consequences of such a finding, including in relation to, but not limited to, human rights treaties.
Ms. Kaplan(Israel), addressing the topic of reservations to treaties, said that her delegation still had some doubts concerning both alternative versions of draft guideline 3.1.5(Definition of the object andpurpose of the treaty) or Incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty.
The attempt to define the object andpurpose of the treaty in draft guideline 3.1.5, on incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty, indicated more a direction than a clear criterion; nonetheless, it was very useful.
As for the view that a monitoring body was particularly well placed to determine the compatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty, the body in question owed its existence only to the treaty and had no powers other than those conferred on it by States parties; it was thus for the States parties alone,unless the treaty provided otherwise, to decide on the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty.
Mr. Pecsteen(Belgium), noting the Special Rapporteur's view that the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of a treaty raised a question about the validity of the reservation, said that his delegation welcomed the use of the term"validity.
On the other hand, even if the State had the exclusive responsibility torectify an inadmissible reservation, the fact remained that the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of a treaty and the ensuing consequences should be objective.
While draft guideline 3.1.5(Incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty) does not establisha directly operational definition of the concept of the"object and purpose of the treaty", it does indicate when, as a general rule, a reservation should be considered as contrary to the object and purpose of the treaty and attempts to clarify the wording of article 19(c) of the Vienna Conventions.
It was suggested, however, that the proviso"unless thetreaty so provides" be inserted in the text of the draft guideline in order to capture those situations in which the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of the treaty would depend on objections to it being made by a predetermined number of contracting States or organizations.
It was also observed that the incompatibility of a reservation with the object and purpose of a treaty should be decided in an objective way according to more clearly defined criteria; to leave this matter entirely in the hands of States parties was not always satisfactory and sometimes could be confusing, although it was the exclusive responsibility of the State itself to rectify the defect in the expression of its consent to be bound.