Примеры использования Information certifier на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Information certifier.
The identity of the information certifier;
An information certifier is obliged to.
The identify of the information certifier;
An information certifier is[obliged to[shall]] inter alia.
Article H. Obligations of an information certifier 108-119 27.
An information certifier shall not be liable under paragraph 2.
Article 12.[Responsibilities][duties] of an information certifier.
An information certifier shall be responsible for the consequences of its failure to fulfill the obligations in paragraph(1)”.
Any person who reasonably relies on a certificate issued by the information certifier.
A party who has contracted with the information certifier for the provision of a certificate; or.
Internationally recognized liability standards were also needed bypractitioners of electronic signatures, including information certifiers themselves.
In such cases, the information certifier would have a corresponding obligation under draft article H with respect to the content of the certificate.
Any limitation on the scope orextent of liability which the information certifier accepts to any person”.
An information certifier shall be[responsible][liable] for its failure to[fulfil the obligations[duties] in][satisfy the requirements of] paragraph 1.
It was clear that the relationship between the key holder and the information certifier would be a contractual relationship which would be governed by the applicable law.
Another suggestion was that the Uniform Rules, without interfering with the operation of domestic law,might provide a list of factors to be taken into consideration when applying domestic law to information certifiers.
That life-cycle might begin before the certificate was actually issued,for example at the time when the information certifier received an application for issuance of the certificate.
In the case of the information provided to the information certifier, the connection between the obligation in this draft article and that in draft article H(1)(b)(which imposed an obligation in respect of information to be certified) was highlighted.
Subject to paragraph(3), if the damage has been caused as a result of the certificate being incorrect or defective, an information certifier shall be liable for damage suffered by either.
In response to this suggestion,it was pointed out that removing the words referring to information certifiers and relying parties might mean that the obligation was unlimited, when the focus should actually be upon representations which related to the process of identification.
A suggestion was made that the words“which enable a relying party to ascertain” should be replaced by the words“which enable a relying party to ascertain any of the following, that the information certifier is capable of disclosing”.
Ensure that all material representations or statements the information certifier makes are accurate and complete to the best of it's knowledge and belief;
After discussion, the Working Group decided that, before reaching a final conclusion on draft article 10, it would be necessary to consider draft article 11, andthe responsibilities that might attach to information certifiers under draft article 12.
Take reasonable steps to ascertain the accuracy of any facts or information that the information certifier certifies in the certificate,[including the identity of the signature holder];
Liability of the information certifier may not exceed the loss which the information certifier foresaw or ought to have foreseen at the time of its failure in the light of facts or matters which the information certifier knew or ought to have known to be possible consequences of the information certifier's failure to[fulfil the obligations[duties] in][satisfy the requirements of] paragraph 1.
For that purpose, the substance of those criteria should be set forthin draft article 12, with a reference in draft article 13 to foreign information certifiers having to comply with the criteria set forth in draft article 12 in order to obtain recognition.
Certificates issued by a foreign information certifier are recognized as legally equivalent to certificates issued by information certifiers operating under[the law of the enacting State]if the practices of the foreign information certifier provide a level of reliability at least equivalent to that required of information certifiers under… the law of the enacting State.
It was suggested that the duties of the key holder in article F should be analysed in terms of the parties orclasses of parties to whom the duty was owed; the information certifier on one hand and a group of potential relying parties on the other.
Certificates issued by a foreign information certifier are recognized as legally equivalent to certificates issued by information certifiers operating under…[the law of the enacting State]if the practices of the foreign information certifiers provide a level of reliability at least equivalent to that required of information certifiers under…[the law of the enacting State]. Such recognition may be made through a published determination of the State or through bilateral or multilateral agreement between or among the States concerned.