Примеры использования Intellectual property regimes на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Intellectual property regimes have threatened food security in several ways.
Other speakers remarked on the importance of Intellectual Property Regimes in promoting the transfer of technologies.
Intellectual property regimes should have an explicit human rights and ethical orientation.
To be consistent with a human rights-based approach, intellectual property regimes should be conducive to realizing these goals.
Intellectual property regimes have historically failed to take into account the unique concerns of indigenous peoples.
Conversely, human rights considerations impose conditions on the manner in which author's rights are protected in intellectual property regimes.
Failure to develop intellectual property regimes that reflect ethical and human rights considerations.
Pursuant to one view,the exclusion contained in that paragraph should be retained with a view to preventing potential conflict with existing intellectual property regimes.
Intellectual property regimes must also encourage the development of international contacts and cooperation in the scientific field.
The implication of our analysis is that the interests of developing countries are best served by tailoring their intellectual property regimes to their particular economic and social circumstances.
With regard to science, intellectual property regimes needed to promote scientific progress and broad access to its benefits.
Ms. Blum(Colombia) said that every effort must be made to ensure that globalization helped reduce the existing asymmetries in international trade, intellectual property regimes and investment flows.
Under present intellectual property regimes authors protected their ideas for a certain period, such as 30 years.
There is a need for sui generis systems for protecting our knowledge because current intellectual property regimes are inadequate, inappropriate and do not take into consideration our customary laws.
Further, intellectual property regimes needed to reflect individual countries' development requirements and be consistent with the cultural orientations of major groups of society.
To be consistent with obligations to respect international human rights, intellectual property regimes must promote and protect all human rights, including the full range of rights guaranteed in the Covenant.
Current intellectual property regimes, which were developed to suit the needs of an age of printing are often inadequate to deal with the challenges of new technologies.
To promote realization of the right to cultural participation, States Parties should develop intellectual property regimes that are consistent with the practice and revitalization of cultural traditions within their country.
Traditionally, intellectual property regimes sought to balance the rights of creators with the interests of the public to have access to artistic works and technology products.
To further its foreign policy interests of promoting strict intellectual property regimes, the U.S. government has exercised considerable diplomatic pressure and threatened trade sanctions on a number of occasions.
It is essential that intellectual property regimes facilitate and promote development cooperation, technology transfer and scientific and cultural collaboration.
Whereas human rights are dedicated to assuring satisfactory standards of human welfare and well-being, intellectual property regimes, although they traditionally provide protection to individual authors and creators, are increasingly focused on protecting business and corporate interests and investments.
The potential of intellectual property regimes to obstruct new technological solutions to critical human problems such as food, water, health, chemical safety, energy and climate change requires attention.
Accordingly, the Committee wishes to emphasize that national and international intellectual property regimes must be consistent with the obligation of States parties to ensure the progressive realization of full enjoyment of all the rights in the Covenant.
The relationship between intellectual property regimes and human rights has been most comprehensively addressed in the context of health, although it is now receiving more attention in the contexts of the right to food and of climate change.
A human rights approach conditions intellectual property regimes on their conformity with ethical and human rights principles.
The first is the expansion of the areas covered by intellectual property regimes to include, for example, patenting of biological entities, copyright print protections in the digital domain, and private intellectual property claims with respect to cultural heritage and traditional knowledge.
Furthermore, all parties are urged to ensure that intellectual property regimes contribute, in a practical and substantive way, to the full realization of all the Covenant rights.
Ms. Chapman noted that the current intellectual property regimes were not applicable to indigenous artistic creations and knowledge.
Therefore the manner in which intellectual property regimes determine eligibility for this entitlement is very significant.