Примеры использования Is inadmissible ratione temporis на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The State party contends that the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis.
It reiterates that the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis, insofar as it relates to events that occurred before 10 March 1988.
The State party therefore submits that the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis.
The State party submits that the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis with regard to Ms. Campo-Trumel, Ms. Muzard-Fekkar, Ms. Remy-Cremieu and Ms. Delange.
The State party argues therefore that the claim is inadmissible ratione temporis.
The State party further argues that the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis since the alleged discriminatory confiscation took place before the entry into force of the Covenant.
Accordingly, the State party claims that the author's communication is inadmissible ratione temporis.
The Committee finds that the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis under article 1 of the Optional Protocol.
The authors reject the State party's contention that their communication is inadmissible ratione temporis.
Consequently, it submits that the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis so far as it relates to the circumstances surrounding the two convictions and the respective claims for compensation.
The Committee has taken note of the State party's argument that the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis.
The State party contends that the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis pursuant to article 4, paragraph 2 e.
The State party,referring to the Committee's jurisprudence, therefore argues that the claim is inadmissible ratione temporis.
Accordingly, the State party submits that the whole communication is inadmissible ratione temporis under article 4, paragraph 2(e), of the Optional Protocol.
Further, the State party argues that the authors' claim relating to the 1952 peace treaty is inadmissible ratione temporis.
Although the State party has not argued that the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis, the Committee notes that the violations alleged by the author occurred prior to the entry into force of the Optional Protocol.
As regards the author's claim under article 26, the State party argues that it is inadmissible ratione temporis.
The Committee takes note of the State party's objection that the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis, as it relates to events which occurred prior to the entry into force of the Optional Protocol for Greece on 5 August 1997.
The Committee has found that this complaint,claiming unlawful discrimination, is inadmissible ratione temporis.
Subsidiarily, the State party argues that the claim is inadmissible ratione temporis, as the authors' property was forfeited in 1971, i.e. long before the Covenant and the Optional Protocol entered into force for the Czech Republic.
By submission of 19 March 2004,the State party argues that the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis pursuant to article 4, paragraph 2 e.
The State party further submits that the property in question was forfeited in 1970, prior to the entry into force of the Covenant and Optional Protocol in the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic; andconsequently the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis.
The Committee concludes that this part of the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis under article 1 of the Optional Protocol.
In his reply dated 5 May 1993,the author challenges the State party's contention that part of the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis.
The Committee's decision made by a slim majority stated that the complaint is inadmissible ratione temporis under article 4, paragraph 2(e) of the Optional Protocol.
By its submission of 3 August 2006, the State party disputes the admissibility of the communication, arguing that the author failed to exhaust domestic remedies, that the same matter has been examined under another procedure of international investigation orsettlement and that the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis.
Regarding Ms. Delange,the State party argues that her allegation is inadmissible ratione temporis with regard to her eldest child only.
Given that the Ministry's decision of 11 May 1993 predated the entry into force of the Optional Protocol for Germany on 25 November 1993,the State party concludes that the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis based on the German reservation.
By submission of 4 December 1997,the State party argues that the communication is inadmissible ratione temporis, as manifestly ill-founded, and for failure to exhaust domestic remedies.
The Committee therefore concludes that the communication with regard to Ms. Daufrene-Levrard, Ms. Campo-Trumel, Ms. Muzard-Fekkar, Ms. Remy-Cremieu andMs. Delange with regard to her eldest child is inadmissible ratione temporis under article 4, paragraph 2(e), of the Optional Protocol.