Примеры использования Joint meeting decided на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Joint Meeting decided to keep this section.
After consideration of the report of the group, the Joint Meeting decided.
Eventually the Joint Meeting decided to keep the first option.
Since the representatives of industry had not taken any decision on the issue, the Joint Meeting decided.
The Joint Meeting decided to amend paragraph 5.4.1.1.6.3 see annex 3.
On the basis of the discussions of an ad hoc working group, the Joint Meeting decided to entrust consideration of this matter to a Working Group chaired by Germany.
The Joint Meeting decided by a vote to assign provision AP3 to UN No. 1408 see annex II.
Following a brief discussion in plenary meeting, the Joint Meeting decided to submit the documents to the Working Group on Tanks for consideration.
The Joint Meeting decided that it was unnecessary to include provisions of this nature in the Annexes of RID and ADR.
In the heading of 6.5.4.14, the Joint Meeting decided that the word"individual" should be kept.
The Joint Meeting decided to leave matters as they currently were in RID and ADR where lighters were concerned.
During its session in March 2010, the Joint Meeting decided to dedicate a working group to deal with this issue.
The Joint Meeting decided to place this provision between square brackets and to revert to it at the next session.
While awaiting a possible decision by IAEA on this matter, the Joint Meeting decided to keep to the current text of the IAEA Regulations and the United Nations Model Regulations.
The Joint Meeting decided that the attribution of tunnel codes was a matter for WP.15 alone.
After a lengthy and contentious discussion concerning, in particular,the addition to paragraph 1.4.2.3.2 proposed by France(INF.27 from the previous session), the Joint Meeting decided to defer a decision.
At its March 2010 session, the Joint Meeting decided to have a working group deal with this issue.
The Joint Meeting decided to conform to the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods since the lower limit of 450 litres would be applied in maritime transport and the definitions of marginal(2) 211 were clear enough to ensure that tank-containers were not confused with the receptacles in question.
As to whether“LQ 0”(no exemptions)should be kept or deleted, the Joint Meeting decided to keep it as a“guarantee” that the case had been considered, rather than delete it, although the explanation in column 7 would specify that its absence meant that no exemption was applicable.
The Joint Meeting decided, however, to maintain this exemption for RID, while the WP.15 Working Party should take the decision for ADR.
In paragraph 6, the Joint Meeting decided to keep to the text submitted by the secretariat in document TRANS/WP.15/AC.1/1999/7, Part 1.
The joint meeting decided in the first phase to proceed with the priority activities described below.
Moreover, the last Joint Meeting decided to replace TE1 of 6.8.4 with the following new paragraph cfr. point 8 of INF. 17.
The Joint Meeting decided that transitional measures with an expiry date of 31 December 1999 or 31 December 2000 could be deleted.
At its sessions in September andOctober 2003, the Joint Meeting decided that the new security provisions in 1.10.1, 1.10.2 and 1.10.3 did not apply when the quantities of dangerous goods carried in packages in each transport unit/wagon or large container, were not greater than those referred to in 1.1.3.6.
The Joint Meeting decided to maintain the decision of the United Nations SubCommittee of Experts and amended 5.2.1.9.2(d) accordingly.
The Joint Meeting decided that the one-week Joint Meeting in March 1998 would be entirely devoted to the restructuring.
The Joint Meeting decided to submit the documents to the working group on tanks for its initial consideration, prior to their discussion in plenary session.
The Joint Meeting decided that paragraphs 16, 17 and 19 of the United Nations Recommendations would not appear in RID and ADR in view of their general nature as recommendations.
The joint meeting decided to set up a working group of two members from each Committee, who will liaise intersessionally to develop a paper.