Примеры использования Joint meeting considered на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Joint Meeting considered all the texts in square brackets in this core document.
On the question of whether the carriage in pieces requirement(AP3) for UN No. 1405 and UN No. 2844 should apply to all substances in Class 4.3(excluding carriage in powder orgranular form) the Joint Meeting considered that this should remain open for consideration at its September session.
The Joint Meeting considered that a proposal should first be made to the United Nations Committee of Experts.
In light of those inconsistencies the Joint Meeting considered it would be premature to introduce the definitions proposed by the secretariat.
The Joint Meeting considered, however, that these changes should be the subject of an official proposal.
In this context, the Joint Meeting considered, in particular, which kind of supportive Governmental measures could assist in this process.
The Joint Meeting considered the various proposals for referring to EN standards put forward by the working group.
Coming back to Part 2, the Joint Meeting considered informal document INF.4(CEPE) concerning collective entries in subsection 2.1.1.2 for paints.
The Joint Meeting considered the text of Chapter 4.3, as revised by the drafting group, paragraph by paragraph.
GE.02-25242 During its session in March 2002, the Joint Meeting considered the Swiss document TRANS/WP.15/AC.1/2002/6, which proposed amendments to the limited quantity provisions in the light of discussions at a working group held in Berne on 6-7 September 2001.
The Joint Meeting considered that the working group's conclusions on the leakproofness of the closing devices of tanks were not clear.
The Joint Meeting considered the proposals to bring ADN into line with the 2005 version of ADNR, in that some differences still existed.
However, the Joint Meeting considered that no decision could be taken at the present session on the basis of an informal document that had been submitted late.
The Joint Meeting considered that making these fertilizers subject to RID/ADR was a substantive change which should be proposed officially.
The Joint Meeting considered that there was no need to make provision for special transitional measures for these new provisions since they were not applicable retroactively.
The Joint Meeting considered that it would be preferable to submit a proposal to the United Nations Sub-Committee of Experts in order to establish specific conditions of carriage for these substances.
The Joint Meeting considered that the question of keeping or deleting notes(4) and(5) in 1.2.2.1(“Units of measurement”) should be considered in the context of the new Class 7.
The Joint Meeting considered that a new discussion would be possible only during the next session, and the proposed amendments were adopted as a first step see annex II.
The Joint Meeting considered that it would be premature to introduce provisions for the transport of damaged lithium batteries, as the United Nations Sub-Committee of Experts was working on that issue.
The Joint Meeting considered that 7.5.3.3 and 7.5.3.4, which also only concerned RID, did not constitute prohibitions of mixed loading but rather conditions for carriage by train composition.
The Joint Meeting considered that the proposal by Austria concerned all modes of transport and therefore should first be submitted to the United Nations Sub-Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods.
The Joint Meeting considered that the procedure proposed by CEN for dedicated standards(EN, EN ISO and EN ISO IEC) referring directly to RID/ADR/ADN was acceptable informal document INF.14.
The Joint Meeting considered that, if the representative of Romania wished to amend the definition given in the Model Regulations, she should address herself in the first instance to the United Nations Sub-Committee of Experts.
The Joint Meeting considered that the corresponding transitional measure drafted by the Working Group on Tanks should not be placed in a NOTE under the table of 6.8.2.6, and that it should be redrafted.
The Joint Meeting considered that this revised definition could apply only to RID/ADR tanks manufactured with steel conforming to EN material standards, and was not relevant for UN portable tanks.
The Joint Meeting considered the proposals of the Ad Hoc Working Group and adopted the proposed texts, some subject to editorial correction, others as amended to take account of the specific comments below see annex I.
The Joint Meeting considered this chapter submitted by the representative of EIGA, recalling that account had been taken of the comments and suggestions of the September 1998 Joint Meeting. .
The Joint Meeting considered all the pending issues relating to the revision of chapter 6.2 in the order proposed by the secretariat, and adopted the decisions below, taking into consideration the relevant new proposals and comments.
The Joint Meeting considered that it was unnecessary to specify in 5.4.1.1.1, as Austria had proposed(INF.5), where in the transport document the additional particulars required by special provision 640 should appear.
Following a vote, the Joint Meeting considered that, generally speaking, the provisions relating to the declaration of empty uncleaned packagings in the transport document should continue to be aligned on those of the United Nations Model Regulations.