Примеры использования Jurisdiction in accordance with article на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Application of jurisdiction in accordance with article 15, paragraph 2, of the Organized Crime Convention is optional.
However, only 65 of the 192 States Members of the United Nations had accepted the Court's jurisdiction in accordance with article 36, paragraph 2, of its Statute.
Any judgment given by a court with jurisdiction in accordance with article 19 which is enforceable in the State of origin where it is no longer subject to ordinary forms of review, shall be recognized in any State Party, except.
Liechtenstein greatly appreciated the work of the Court andcalled upon all States which had not yet done so to accept its jurisdiction in accordance with Article 36 of its Statute.
The Committee, while welcoming that the State party may exercise its jurisdiction in accordance with article 4 of the Optional Protocol, remains concerned at the lack of detailed information on procedures used to deal with all offences covered by the Optional Protocol.
It was also observed that one way of activating the Convention was for States parties to extend their jurisdiction in accordance with article 10(2)(b) of the Convention.
Austria will establish its jurisdiction in accordance with article 5 of the Convention irrespective of the laws applying to the place where the offence occurred, but in respect of paragraph 1(c) only if prosecution by a State having jurisdiction under paragraph 1(a) or paragraph 1(b) is not to be expected.
In that regard, Kenya has deposited with the Secretary-General a declaration of acceptance of the Court's compulsory jurisdiction in accordance with Article 36, paragraph 2, of the Statute of the Court.
We note the acceptance by 65 States of the Court's compulsory jurisdiction in accordance with article 36, paragraph 2, of the Statute, and that some 300 bilateral or multilateral treaties provide for the Court to have jurisdiction in the resolution of disputes arising out of the application or interpretation of those respective treaties.
Encourages States to continue considering recourse to the Court by means available under its Statute, including accepting,if they have not done so, its jurisdiction in accordance with Article 36, paragraph 2, of the Statute;"5.
Any judgement of a court having jurisdiction in accordance with Article 17 of the Protocol, which is enforceable in the State of origin and is no longer subject to ordinary forms of review, shall be recognized in any Contracting Party as soon as the formalities required in that Party have been completed, except.
The amendment(A/C.3/62/L.68) was intended to improve the languageof the draft resolution, allowing each Member State to decide on matters within its domestic jurisdiction, in accordance with Article 7 of the Charter of the United Nations.
Any judgement of a court having jurisdiction in accordance with article 13 or any arbitral award which is enforceable in the State of origin of the judgement and is no longer subject to ordinary forms of review shall be recognized in any Party as soon as the formalities required in that Party have been completed, except.
The Committee recommends that the State party ensure that all legal and practical measures necessary be undertaken in order tobe able to effectively establish its jurisdiction in accordance with article 4 of the Optional Protocol, in particular.
Any judgement of a court having jurisdiction in accordance with article 13 of the Protocol or of an arbitral award which is enforceable in the State of origin of the judgement and is no longer subject to ordinary forms of review shall be recognized in any Party as soon as the formalities required in that Party have been completed, except.
For the purposes of extradition, such offences shall be treated as if they had been committed not only in the place in which they occurred, butalso in the territories of the States required to establish their jurisdiction in accordance with article 5, paragraph 1.
Furthermore, the rules laid down in the article guarantee proper application andthat State consent to exercise of jurisdiction in accordance with article 7 shall not be considered as implicit consent to the taking of measures of constraint pursuant to article 18, paragraph 1.
Under paragraph 4, the offence shall be treated, for the purpose of extradition, as if it had been committed not only in the place in which it occurred butalso in the territories of the States required to establish their jurisdiction in accordance with article 4, paragraph 1.
Where the judgment is irreconcilable with an earlier judgment given in the State where the recognition is sought, orgiven in another State Party with jurisdiction in accordance with article 19 and already recognized in the State where the recognition is sought, involving the same cause of action and between the same parties.
Such offences shall be treated, for the purpose of extradition between States parties, as if they had been committed not only in the place in which they occurred butalso in the territories of the States required to establish their jurisdiction in accordance with article 5, paragraph 1.
Thus, in accordance with the Colombian Constitutional Court,the Penal Code allows for the possibility of exercising extraterritorial jurisdiction in accordance with article 9 of the Constitution, which establishes that Colombia's foreign relations are based on, inter alia, the principles of international law accepted by Colombia, in particular universal jurisdiction. .
The Committee notes that the State party's legislation allows for prosecution of its nationals who committed a crime abroad, butregrets that the State party has not established extraterritorial jurisdiction in accordance with article 4 of the Optional Protocol.
A State Party which receives more than one request for extradition from States which have established jurisdiction in accordance with article 7 and which decides not to prosecute shall,in selecting the State to which the offender or alleged offender is to be extradited, pay due regard to the interests and responsibilities of the State Party whose flag the ship was flying at the timeof the commission of the offence.
If necessary, the crimes shall be treated, for the purposes of extradition between States parties, as if they had been committed not only in the place in which they occurred butalso in the territory of the States parties which have established their jurisdiction in accordance with article 4.
A State party which receives more than one request for extradition from States which have established jurisdiction in accordance with article 5 of this Convention and which takes a decision not to undertake prosecution, shall, in choosing the State to which the alleged offender is to be extradited, duly take into account the interests and obligations of the State party in the territory of which the act of nuclear terrorism was committed.
In this respect, it should be noted that, as at 31 July 2004, 191 States were parties to the Statute of the Court and that 65 of them had deposited with the SecretaryGeneral a declaration of acceptance of the Court's compulsory jurisdiction in accordance with Article 36, paragraph 2, of the Statute.
A State party which receives more than one request for extradition from States which have established jurisdiction in accordance with article 5 of this Convention and which decides not to prosecute shall, in selecting the State to which the offender or alleged offender is to be extradited, pay due regard to the interests and responsibilities of the State party in the territory of which the act of nuclear terrorism was committed.”.
Treat the offences referred to in article 3(1), for the purpose of extradition between States Parties, as if they had been committed not only in the place in which they occurred butalso in the territories of the States required to establish their jurisdiction in accordance with article 4.
The Party in the territory of which the alleged offender is present shall,when it has jurisdiction in accordance with Article 14, if it does not extradite that person, be obliged, without exception whatsoever and whether or not the offence was committed in its territory, to submit the case without undue delay to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution, through proceedings in accordance with the laws of that Party.
When the offences are committed in any territory under its jurisdiction or on board a ship or aircraft registered in that State"(subparagraph 1(a) of Article 5 of the Convention),Japan establishes its jurisdiction in accordance with Article 1 of the Penal Code Crimes within Japan.