Примеры использования Management evaluation function на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Proposed time frame for the management evaluation function.
However, the management evaluation function proposed to replace it appeared to be the same mechanism under a new name.
Subject to these concerns, the Advisory Committee sees merit in a management evaluation function.
The management evaluation function permits management to deal with requests if possible and avoid unnecessary litigation.
In fact, the administrative review process and the management evaluation function are different in a number of essential aspects.
The management evaluation function is an important opportunity to do so by allowing for faulty administrative decisions to be addressed.
The table below summarizes the Secretary-General's proposals for the management evaluation function and the related recommendations of the Advisory Committee.
The Singaporean delegation was therefore sceptical of the SMCC recommendation, endorsed by the Secretary-General,to replace the current process of administrative review with a management evaluation function.
Responsibility for the management evaluation function should not lie with those whose policies or decisions are, in fact, under scrutiny.
Having examined the additional information in the Secretary-General's report,the Advisory Committee doubts that the management evaluation function, in the form proposed, would add value to the process.
A total of 16 posts for the management evaluation function, including 11 new posts and the redeployment of 5 posts from the Department of Management; .
Under the peacekeeping support account, a further 21 posts are requested, including 9 posts for the Office of the Ombudsman,9 for the Office of Staff Legal Assistance and 3 for the management evaluation function.
The Unit assists management in alternative dispute resolution, steers the management evaluation function and represents UNFPA before the United Nations Dispute Tribunal.
In order to ensure that this new function is more effective than the administrative review processthat it will replace, the Secretary-General endorses the following new measures agreed to by the Committee to strengthen the management evaluation function.
Field legal officers to assist in the management evaluation function and to advise heads of mission in discharging their delegation of disciplinary authority.
The Advisory Committee considers that by providing management with the opportunity to review and, where necessary,remedy faulty administrative decisions, the management evaluation function plays an important role in avoiding unnecessary recourse to litigation.
The Secretary-General's proposal to introduce a formal, mandatory management evaluation function, with the establishment of a large structure dedicated for that purpose might only add costs and delays to the process.
The Advisory Committee on Administrative andBudgetary Questions has stated that every effort should be made to resolve cases before staff members resort to litigation and that the management evaluation function is an important opportunity to do so A/65/557, para. 16.
Moreover, the Staff-Management Coordination Committee agreed that the management evaluation function would be reviewed one year after the new system of administration of justice was fully implemented.
Given the difficulties experienced with the administrative review function in the past, in particular with respect to the length of the process(see A/61/205, para. 87),the Advisory Committee considers it essential that the management evaluation function be executed promptly.
Details on the Secretary-General's proposals for the management evaluation function requested by the General Assembly in paragraph 32(i) of its resolution 61/261 are provided in paragraphs 75 to 95 of his report A/62/294.
It is proposed, accordingly, on the basis of existing and projected workloads that P-4 legal officers be assigned to MONUC, UNMIL and UNMIT, to provide the heads of those Missions with advice on disciplinary decisions,as well as to support the management evaluation function.
It is concerned that the Secretary-General's proposal for introducing a formal,mandatory management evaluation function, with the establishment of a large structure dedicated for this purpose may only add costs and delays to the process.
The Secretary-General supports the Panel's proposal to abolish the current process of administrative review prior to action in the formal justice system(ibid.,para. 158). However, he endorses the Committee's recommendation to replace this review with a properly resourced and strengthened management evaluation function as a first step in the formal justice system.
With regard to the formal system,it was essential to strengthen the management evaluation function in order to ensure that the Administration had the opportunity to review or overturn decisions prior to their being brought before the Dispute Tribunal.
In the report of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions(A/65/557, para.16), it was stated that every effort should be made to resolve cases before staff members resort to litigation and that the management evaluation function was an important opportunity to do so by allowing for faulty administrative decisions to be addressed.
In that context, the Advisory Committee considers that the management evaluation function should be completed in a shorter time frame than the proposed 45 days and it recommends that a reasoned response be provided promptly, with the period not to exceed 30 days.
However, as not all funds and programmes will be participating in all elements of the new system of administration of justice, such as the management evaluation function, which, as explained in the present report is for the United Nations and the peacekeeping operations only, only certain elements will be cost-shared.
The Secretary-General had proposed instead to develop a management evaluation function, to be carried out by a separate unit in the Department of Management, as the first, mandatory step of the formal system of justice, in order to give the Administration an opportunity to review contested decisions and to allow it to correct or overturn previous administrative decisions, prior to a complainant's bringing a formal case to the Dispute Tribunal A/61/758, paras. 29-30.
The Secretary-General endorses the Committee's proposed modification of this recommendation, namely,that in the context of the management evaluation function(see paras. 29-31 below), complaints of prejudicial or injurious conduct that do not conform to the Staff Regulations and Rules or administrative issuances would be reviewed promptly by management. .