Примеры использования Manifestly arbitrary на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
They were neither manifestly arbitrary nor did they amount to a denial of justice.
In the present case, the PRRA assessment of the facts andevidence is manifestly arbitrary and/or amounts to a denial of justice.
The Committee recalls its jurisprudence that it is generally for the courts of States parties to review or to evaluate facts and evidence, or to examine the interpretation of domestic legislation by national courts and tribunals, unless it can be ascertained that the conduct of the trial or the evaluation of facts and evidence orinterpretation of legislation was manifestly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice.
The authors have not shown that this decision was manifestly arbitrary or otherwise amounted to a denial of justice.
In the instant case, the Committee,having examined the Supreme Court's decision, is of the opinion that the decision is not manifestly arbitrary or illfounded.
The object of the review is to verify that the decision at first instance is not manifestly arbitrary and that it does not constitute a denial of justice.
It notes that the Committee's role, as it has acknowledged on numerous occasions,is not to substitute its evaluation of evidence for that of national courts unless their evaluation is manifestly arbitrary or ill-founded.
The information before the Committee does not show that the Spanish courts' weighing-up of the facts was manifestly arbitrary or can be considered to amount to a denial of justice.
He argues that the Constitution cannot, any more than any other law, retroactively affect a citizen's legal standing, and contends with respect to his own situation that judges can only be replaced when theirposts fall vacant and that it was therefore manifestly arbitrary to abridge his term of office.
The Committee is of the view that, while such errors might have created a degree of dissatisfaction in the author,they are insufficient to qualify as manifestly arbitrary a reasoned judgement that analyses in detail the scores awarded to the participants in the competition.
The information before the Committee and the arguments advanced by the author do not show that the courts' evaluation of the facts andtheir interpretation of the law were manifestly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice.
It is not apparent from the material that was submitted to the Committee that the courts' decisions were manifestly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice.
The material before the Committee does not reveal that the decisions of the District Attorney and General Prosecutor,as well as that of the Brandenburg Supreme Court, were manifestly arbitrary or amounted to denial of justice.
It is therefore not for the Committee to evaluate facts and evidence,unless the domestic decisions are manifestly arbitrary or amount to a denial of justice.
The Committee recalls its jurisprudence in this respect and reiterates that, in general, it is for the relevant domestic courts to review or evaluate facts and evidence,unless their evaluation is manifestly arbitrary or amounts to a denial of justice.
Counsel reiterates that the Tribunal's failure to append the report to the case file made the proceedings manifestly arbitrary and constituted a denial of justice.
The State party concludes that the Committee is not a"fourth instance" andthat the author has not substantiated that the alleged defects in the disciplinary proceedings were manifestly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice.
The State party contests that the fact that the report was not taken into account made the proceedings manifestly arbitrary or constituted a denial of justice.
It observes that whether the charge was included in the indictment is a matter of fact which in principle the domestic courts must determine unless their determination is manifestly arbitrary or constitutes a denial of justice.
The information before the Committee and the arguments advanced before the author do not show that the Courts' evaluation of the facts were manifestly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice.
In the opinion of the Committee, the author has failed to substantiate, for purposes of admissibility,that the Court's finding was manifestly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice.
The information before the Committee andthe arguments advanced by the author do not show that the Courts' evaluation of the facts were manifestly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice.
In principle, it is not for the Committee to question the evaluation of the evidence made by national courts,unless that evaluation was manifestly arbitrary or constituted a denial of justice.
The information before the Committee and the arguments advanced by the author do not show that the Courts' evaluation of the facts was manifestly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice.
Moreover, the information before the Committee andthe arguments advanced by the author do not show that the Courts' evaluation of the facts was manifestly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice.
The Committee further expressed the view that the author did not provide any evidence that would enable it to conclude that the assessment conducted was manifestly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice.
The author's allegations and the information before the Committee do not substantiate that the Court of Appeal orthe High Court's decisions were manifestly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice.
It is not within the Committee's competence to review facts orstatements that have been weighed up by the domestic courts unless the weighing-up was manifestly arbitrary or there was a miscarriage of justice.
If a jury or court reaches a reasonable conclusion on a particular matter of fact in the light of the evidence available,the decision cannot be held to be manifestly arbitrary or to amount to a denial of justice.
If a jury or court reaches a reasonable conclusion on a particular matter of fact in the light of the evidence available,the decision cannot be held to be manifestly arbitrary or to amount to a denial of justice.