Примеры использования Mercury emission на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Type and efficiency of mercury emission control measures;
Its mercury emission level in 2009 was 0.154 Mg, which was above the emission level of 0.148 Mg in the base year.
Germany presented information on the recent revision to mercury emission estimates in Germany.
The level of achieved co-control of mercury emission reduction can vary significantly, depending on the characteristics of the input materials and details of the controls.
To improve global understanding of international mercury emission sources, fate and transport;
A mercury emission reduction of 92-97 per cent was consistently observed on a 600 MW unit firing subbituminous coal and equipped with an SCR and wet FGD Rini and Vosteen, 2009.
Chemical treatment of coal is capable of mercury emission reduction of up to 70 per cent.
Information presented in the emissions report should be regarded as a first step towards achieving mercury emission scenarios.
Table 1: Costs and benefits of Mercury emission reduction for various reduction options.
This scheme will allow greater choice to the industry in deciding how to meet the national 50% mercury emission reduction target.
One important aspect when estimating costs for mercury emission control are the assumptions of baseline conditions.
The Committee noted that these emission data provided showed that Cyprus has achieved compliance with regard to its mercury emission reduction obligation.
One important aspect when estimating costs for mercury emission control are existing conditions in a specific plant.
This industry information will be combined with control strategy information from section 2 to estimate the cost of achieving a range of mercury emission reduction targets.
In the case of the LCD it is well documented that mercury emission occurs, exposing the workers to high risk.
Based on this information the Committee concluded that Cyprus was in non-compliance with its obligation under article 3.1 of the 1998 Protocol on Heavy Metals with regards to mercury emission.
Qualitative Benefit Assessment:Medium to Large mercury emission reduction both globally and locally.
The UNEP Global Mercury Partnership area on mercury transport andfate research also provided information important to understanding mercury emission sources and pathways.
The most known non-technological methods of mercury emission reduction include: energy conservation and pollution prevention solutions.
Ii establishing emission limit value for mercury orequivalent technical measures to reduce/ control mercury emission from all source categories;
Low NOx technologies are also likely to reduce mercury emission in the exhaust gases due to the lower operating temperatures.
A description of main current air emission control approaches,including greenhouse gas emission controls that are known to have mercury emission reduction benefits;
A quick estimate is a cost less than US$ 19/ kg reduced mercury emission not considering education or disposal costs.
The identified priority mercury emission sources are coalfired power plants and industrial boilers; non-ferrous metal production(in particular lead, zinc, copper and gold); waste incineration; and cement production.
The Process optimization guidance document summarizes mercury emission reduction practices applicable to coal-fired power plants.
The documents should also set out mercury emission levels that can be achieved by applying each of the techniques, i.e. benchmarks e.g. expressed as concentrations in the discharge to air or as an emission factor.
It further assumes that emissions control measures currently implemented orcommitted to in Europe to reduce mercury emission to air or water would be implemented around the world.
The agreements consisted of setting up multi-annual mercury emission limit values for the whole sector, investments to update installations and training of staff on safety and hygiene issues.
Gathering information on emission scenarios for other pollutants relevant for the development of mercury emission scenarios, e.g., for greenhouse gases and acid rain generation agents.
Large efforts have been made in the US to develop technologies for mercury emission control from coal combustion, including extensive full scale tests of the efficiency of control devices for mercury control depending on coal type, type of sorbent and additional additives, temperature and operating conditions.