Примеры использования Netherlands stated на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Netherlands stated that article 5, paragraph 1(a)(i), was not applicable to its legislation.
Regarding the constitutional obstacles referred to by some delegations,the delegation of the Netherlands stated that this should not be a problem because the protocol was optional.
The Netherlands stated that it would inform the Council on progress in due course.
Among its voluntary pledges andcommitments in support of its candidacy to membership of the Human Rights Council, the Netherlands stated that it was in the process of completing ratification of OPCAT and CRCOPAC.
The expert from the Netherlands stated that the scopes of Regulations Nos. 14 and 16 were not coherent.
The Netherlands stated that it was essential to take action in the context of the current political situation.
At the twentieth session of the Technical Working Group, in May 2002,the expert from the Netherlands stated that submission of the consolidated draft report would be put back to late October 2002 to allow for more comments to be received.
Netherlands stated that it would remain the UNFPA top donor with an annual contribution of $90 million.
The delegations of Germany and the Netherlands stated that they were prepared to agree to the text but felt that it could be simplified.
The Netherlands stated that Syria should extend cooperation to the commission of inquiry established by the Human Rights Council.
The representative of the Netherlands stated that individuals had multiple identities: their religion, their nationality, their professional status.
The Netherlands stated that it had been an honour to be part of the very first session of the universal periodic review.
The Netherlands stated that it considered UNESCO and Unidroit the core bodies to report to on issues related to cultural property.
The Netherlands stated that almost all violations of human rights and international humanitarian law were due to the ongoing armed conflict.
The Netherlands stated that its legislation equips law enforcement and prosecution services with adequate tools to prevent and combat terrorism.
The Netherlands stated that, although the human rights situation in Liechtenstein was excellent, there were challenges, including gender discrimination.
The expert from the Netherlands stated that in the future development of regulations on noise emissions, the consideration of low frequencies would be very important.
The Netherlands stated that it had a central authority or authorities designated to receive, respond to and process requests for mutual legal assistance.
The Netherlands stated it would continue to meet or exceed the standard level of official development assistance of 0.7 per cent of GNP.
The Netherlands stated that it was essential for a productive universal periodic review outcome that the voice of civil society be sufficiently heard by the Council.
The Netherlands stated that, as indicated in the national report, one of the main challenges facing Italy was that it had changed from a country of emigration to one of immigration.
Lastly, the Netherlands stated that there was a lack of information regarding HCB emission factors in the EMEP/EEA Guidebook, and that also the data of other Parties seemed to show inconsistencies.
The expert from the Netherlands stated that the work on a proposal for amendments to Rule No. 1 regarding the exhaust emissions of vehicles was still in progress in his country.
The expert from the Netherlands stated that the head restraint height of 800 mm, as proposed, should be increased in order to ensure a better correspondence with the real anthropometric dimensions.
The Netherlands stated that it supported the main thrust of the draft articles on the prevention of transboundary harm from hazardous activities, which by and large reflected customary international law.
The Netherlands stated that regular meetings took place between private industry security managers and the authorities and that a kidnapping/hostage strategy has been developed.
The Netherlands stated that delegates to the sessions of the Forum had been insufficiently informed about the results and consequences of previous sessions, which prejudiced continuity and resulted in duplication.
Finally, the Netherlands stated that it heard from Argentina regarding problems in introducing a national mechanism for the Optional Protocol to CAT and recommended that Argentina implement such a mechanism as soon as possible.
The Netherlands stated that it had also increased its annual contribution to the UNFPA Global Programme on Reproductive Health Commodity Security and would provide 30 million euros per year until 2011.
The Netherlands stated that it was not aware of any instance in which it had pleaded or relied upon either the articles on the prevention of transboundary harm from hazardous activities or the principles on the allocation of loss in the case of such harm.