Примеры использования Non-permanent members should на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The number of non-permanent members should be increased from 10 to 15.
To this end, the number of both permanent and non-permanent members should be increased.
Four new non-permanent members should be elected as follows.
Thirdly, the distinction between permanent and non-permanent members should remain unchanged.
The number of non-permanent members should be increased by four, five or six.
It would be up to the regional groups themselves to decide which of their non-permanent members should be granted such an exemption.
We believe also that the non-permanent members should have an opportunity to be re-elected alternately.
Like many other delegations,we continue to believe that the number of both permanent and non-permanent members should increase.
Increasing the number of non-permanent members should take into account the interests of all regional groups.
If two additional seats for permanent members are created, the number of non-permanent members should be increased by eight as follows.
Non-permanent members should seek opportunities to take the pen, as the speaker's delegation did on a matter of importance to its country.
The number of its permanent and non-permanent members should be increased.
The number of non-permanent members should be increased by five, and care should be taken to ensure equitable regional representation.
Reform can only materialize if we all agree to a common formula by which the number of permanent and non-permanent members should be increased.
The number of both permanent and non-permanent members should be increased, without extending the right of the veto.
As stated by the Non-Aligned Movement, if agreement is not reached in other categories,at least the number of non-permanent members should be increased for the time being.
In the view of a participant, non-permanent members should be encouraged to take a more active role as penholders.
We further believe that additional permanent members should come from both the developed and developing worlds, andthat arrangements for the increase in the number of non-permanent members should allow for greater representation from small and island States.
Secondly, the increase in permanent and non-permanent members should be based on the current distinction between the two categories.
We further believe that additional permanent members should come from both the developed and developing worlds, andthat the arrangements for the increase in the number of non-permanent members should allow for greater representation from small States and island States.
The negotiations on the non-permanent members should be even simpler, since we already have practices that are well established and accepted by all.
In his view,much had been accomplished over the previous two years and the outgoing non-permanent members should be commended for their solid performance.
The number of non-permanent members should be increased on the basis of equitable geographical representation, and the fulcrum of decision-making should shift.
At the same time, it was understood that the non-permanent members should treat such information with discretion.
As far as the composition of the Security Council was concerned, any enlargement should be limited to a small number of additional permanent and non-permanent members, and if new members were chosen,the existing ratio of permanent and non-permanent members should be preserved.
In addition, four new non-permanent members should be elected as follows: one from Africa, one from Asia, one from Latin America and the Caribbean and one from among the Eastern European States.
If two additional seats for permanent members of the Security Council are created, the number of non-permanent members should be increased by eight, which would make a total of 18 non-permanent members. .
We believe that the number of both permanent and non-permanent members should be increased, and that such expansion should include members from both developed and developing countries.
Of course, any new distribution of seats that is adopted must necessarily include, within each region's respective apportionment, all the regional members participating in the work of the Council, whether ornot they are permanent or non-permanent members should it be decided that such a classification is to be retained.
It is clear that promoting representation of developing countries as both permanent and non-permanent members should be a key objective of the reform, so that the Council can have a logical democratic balance.