Примеры использования Not to use nuclear на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
They must also undertake not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear countries;
They were legally-binding undertakings,consistent with generally recognized principles of international law not to use nuclear weapons.
They should reaffirm their previous commitments not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States. 120.
Under this memorandum, Ukraine refused to have nuclear weapons while Russia, the United States andBritain pledged not to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine.
In any event, to use or not to use nuclear weapons against any country is a problem of a global nature rather than regional.
The draft convention submitted with the resolution calls on States parties to undertake not to use nuclear weapons under any circumstances.
The nuclear-weapon States must assume the obligation not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States and to refrain from the threat of use of such weapons.
In the post-cold-war era, it is not exorbitant to expect the nuclear-weapon States to give a solemn andbinding commitment not to use nuclear weapons.
It had pledged not to be the first to use nuclear weapons and not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States under any circumstances.
With regard to guarantees not to use nuclear weapons or to threaten to use them, my Government believes that the active measures and arrangements of non-nuclear States will help to prevent the proliferation of those weapons.
Under that agreement, there is one component that stipulates that the United States is committed not to use nuclear weapons and not to threaten the security of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
India and Pakistan should commit themselves neither to assemble nuclear devices nor to deploy them on delivery vehicles, and to cease development anddeployment of ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear warheads, and not to use nuclear weapons under any circumstances.
It should be noted that the formulation of the obligation not to use nuclear weapons against NNWS parties to the Treaty must be straightforward and unequivocal.
However, many non-aligned, non-nuclear-weapon States pointed out that such an assurance fell short of their expectations, and expressed a preference for a"negative" assurance, that is,a commitment by the nuclear-weapon States not to use nuclear weapons against countries not possessing such weapons.
Fifthly, the Conference should secure a commitment from nuclear-weapon States not to use nuclear weapons as a first step in a process leading to the negotiation of a convention banning their production and use. .
We pointed out during the informal discussions on NSAs that, along with the current situation, it was also worth bearing in mind that the SecretaryGeneral's High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges andChange recommended that the nuclear-weapon States should reaffirm their previous commitments not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
In order to realize the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula,the United States should commit itself not to use nuclear weapons against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and should withdraw its nuclear umbrella from south Korea.
While New Zealand had chosen not to use nuclear energy for power generation owing to its ongoing concerns about the lack of compatibility between nuclear power and sustainable development, safety and proliferation issues, it recognized the right of other States to make their own decisions in that regard.
The nuclear-weapon States should recognize the status of nuclear-weapon-free zones and provide unconditional andlegally binding assurances not to use nuclear weapons against the nuclear-weapon-free zones and States in the region.
At the same time,China believes that a pledge by all nuclear-weapon States not to use nuclear weapons at all is of even greater significance as it is a more effective step towards the non-proliferation goal underscored by the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
Comprehensive safeguards represent a key means of verifying the compliance by non-nuclear weapon States parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty with their legal obligations not to use nuclear material to manufacture nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.
They should reaffirm their previous commitments not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States,to further diminish the perceived value of nuclear weapons, and secure robust international cooperation to staunch proliferation, formalizing such commitments in pending and future nuclear-weapon-free zones agreements.
All nuclear-weapon States should pledge not to be the first to use nuclear weapons andshould unconditionally commit themselves not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States or States in nuclear-weapon-free zones.
The Guarantors reaffirm, in the case of Ukraine, their commitment not to use nuclear weapons against any non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a state in association or alliance with a nuclear weapon state;
First of all, regarding the issue of negative security assurances(NSA),it is the position of my Government that assurances by the nuclear-weapon States not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States should apply only to NPT member States which faithfully adhere to all the obligations under the Treaty.
That"positive" assurance, while it may have been a step forward in protecting non-nuclear-weapon States against the threat or use of nuclear weapons, also led them to demand"negative" security assurances, andto press for the negotiation of a legally binding instrument requiring nuclear-weapon States not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
During the negotiations that led to the signing of the Treaty in 1968,the five nuclear States undertook not to use nuclear weapons against nonnuclear States, except in response to a nuclear attack or an attack with conventional weapons in an alliance with a nuclear State.
However, many non-aligned non-nuclear-weapon States pointed out that such an assurance fell short of their expectations and expressed a preference for a"negative" assurance,that is, a commitment by the nuclear-weapon States not to use nuclear weapons against countries not possessing such weapons in the form of a multilateral legally binding commitment.
The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland andthe United States of America reaffirm, in the case of Ukraine, their commitment not to use nuclear weapons against any non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a State in association or alliance with a nuclear-weapon State;