Примеры использования Other delegations considered на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Other delegations considered that the programme was well-balanced.
Some delegations supported Sweden's proposal while other delegations considered that this matter is already covered by the ninth indent on the first page of the model of instructions in writing, and that further information would not be necessary for the driver's safety.
Other delegations considered the current balance to be appropriate.
Other delegations considered the inclusion of the subparagraphs essential.
Other delegations considered that private sector resource flows should complement ODA.
Other delegations considered that the appropriate concept was"predictable funding.
Other delegations considered that such transport was already exempt under 1.1.3.1 c.
Other delegations considered that the programme of work would facilitate the process of review of the programme budget.
Other delegations considered that the programme of work would facilitate the process of review of the programme budget.
Other delegations considered that the elements should be kept on the table to be addressed by the protocol in the future.
Yet some other delegations considered that it could be left out altogether since it might create a certain confusion.
Other delegations considered the current balance of goals and service lines to reflect appropriate focus and demand.
Other delegations considered that the more immediate need was to help countries prepare for ratification of the Protocol.
Other delegations considered the function of the supervisory authority not to be of a commercial nature, but of an exclusively public nature.
Other delegations considered the expression of an independent opinion by the Office of Internal Oversight Services to be entirely appropriate.
Other delegations considered that, while the paragraph should be deleted, elements of it should be retained and incorporated in paragraph 1.
Other delegations considered such activities as useful and recalled that UNCTAD undertook similar activities elsewhere RBPs.
Other delegations considered that that would be detrimental to the independence of the sub-committee and would prejudge the quality of its membership.
Some other delegations considered that employment of the term“senior” might result in stigmatizing a category of public officials.
Other delegations considered that the General Assembly was best served by a negotiated text, but more time was needed for discussion of the elements.
Other delegations considered that developing a protocol could be an expensive and time-consuming exercise that would not necessarily be justified by the goals to be achieved.
Other delegations considered that those activities were important and that assistance in that area should be provided also at the regional and subregional levels.
Other delegations considered however, that 1.1.3.1(a) in its current wording could lead to large groups taking on excessive quantities of goods.
Other delegations considered that the Office should be provided with the resources to fully develop its role and that the expenditure was compensated by the savings achieved.
Other delegations considered that this proposal did not concern the restructuring and could lead to lengthy discussions which would not be appropriate during the current session.
Several other delegations considered that the Department of Peace-keeping Operations should be the responsibility centre, with the Centre for Human Rights acting in an advisory capacity.
Other delegations considered that a carrier could decide not to avail itself of the authorized exemptions, whether under the provisions of Chapter 3.4 or, for example, those of 1.1.3.6.
Other delegations considered it to be important and consistent with proposals being developed in other forums, notably the proposals to revise the European Community directive 90/313/EEC.
Other delegations considered that because there was need to tailor the present convention to persons with disabilities, a specific requirement that consent be"clearly expressed" could be necessary.
Other delegations considered that the restructuring of the Centre should be guided by the principles set out in the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action and directed to the full implementation of all mandates.