Примеры использования Other unlawful methods на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Evidence obtained through psychological orphysical pressure or other unlawful methods has no legal force.
Instructions for the verification of reports of torture and other unlawful methods involving the cruel treatment of persons involved in criminal proceedings and held in special institutions and the prevention of use of such methods, approved by Order No. 7 of the Procurator-General's Office on 1 February 2010.
Enforce the ban that does not allow confessions obtained through torture or other unlawful methods to be used as evidence(Uruguay);
Inadmissible evidence includes testimony, such as confessions obtained by the use of torture, violence or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment orpunishment or by deception or other unlawful methods.
Evidence obtained through psychological orphysical pressure or other unlawful methods has no legal force Constitution, art. 45.
Inadmissible evidence covers, in particular, testimony, including confessions, obtained by the use of torture, violence or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment,or by deception or other unlawful methods.
Evidence obtained through psychological orphysical pressure or other unlawful methods has no legal force Code of Criminal Procedure, art. 25, para. 1.
None of the visited convicts indicated that they had been subjected to torture, unlawful measures of physical andmoral pressure or other unlawful methods of investigation.
No evidence was found during the scrutiny of the facts of the case to corroborate the allegation that torture and other unlawful methods of investigation were used against Mr. Ismonov and other convicted persons during the initial inquiry and pretrial investigation.
The order provides for effective and objective verification, with the participation ofrepresentatives of civil society, of complaints of torture and other unlawful methods of inquiry and investigation;
Order No. 7 of the Procurator-General of 1 February 2010 approving the Instructions on the verification of reports of the use of torture or other unlawful methods involving cruel treatment of persons who are parties to criminal proceedings and are being held in specialized facilities, and on the prevention of such practices;
On 12 May 2009, the Ombudsman, together with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe(OSCE) Project Coordinator in Uzbekistan, organized a round-table discussion on the right to defence, practice and problems, with the participation of a foreign expert. Proposals were drafted for improvements to law enforcement practice in ensuring the right to defence andpreventing cases of the use of torture and other unlawful methods.
Violations of constitutional rights and civil liberties during preliminary investigations and inquiry,including torture and other unlawful methods of investigation, were found in eight criminal cases involving 15 persons.
Improvements were made to the Instructions for the verification of reports of torture and other unlawful methods involving the cruel treatment of persons involved in criminal proceedings and held in special institutions and the prevention of use of such methods, which previously had been approved by Order No. 7 of the Procurator-General of 1 February 2010.
The court concluded that the investigation of the author's allegations about being subjected to beatings and other unlawful methods was comprehensive and impartial.
Article 177 establishes criminal liability for“coercion to testify during interrogation by means of threats or other unlawful methods on the part of the person conducting the initial inquiry or pre-trial investigation, and for similar conduct associated with the use of violence or the humiliation of the person under interrogation”.
The order provides for measures to increase the effectiveness of the work of reviewing complaints andreports of torture and other unlawful methods of conducting inquiries and investigations.
On 2 February 2010, a joint order on cooperation between law-enforcement agencies andcivil society actors to verify complaints of torture and other unlawful methods of inquiry and investigation and to undertake prosecutions in such cases was issued by the Minister of Justice, the Procurator-General, the Minister of Internal Affairs and the Chairperson of the National Security Committee Agency to Combat Economic Crime and Corruption.
The decision adopted by the Plenum of the Supreme Court on 24 September 2004 on certain issues arising in the application of criminal procedural law relating to the admissibility of evidence provides that testimony, including confessions, obtained by the use of torture, violence or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment orpunishment, or by deception or other unlawful methods, is inadmissible as evidence.
At the end of the inquiries of the authorities,it was established that all allegations regarding the use of torture or other unlawful methods of investigation against Mr. Musaev aimed at his forced confessions were not confirmed.
Furthermore, the decision adopted by the plenum of the Supreme Court on 24 September 2004 on certain issues arising in the application of criminal procedural law relating to the admissibility of evidence provides that testimony, including confessions, obtained by the use of torture, violence or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment orpunishment, or by deception or other unlawful methods, is inadmissible evidence.
Order No. 7 of the Procurator General approving the instructions on the verification of reports of the use of torture or other unlawful methods and prevention of such practices, on 1 February 2010, which regulates the initial period of custody;
He also asked whether the State party intended to make the filming of interrogations mandatory, a practice that had been introduced in a large number of countries. It would guarantee compliance, for instance, with article 45 of the Constitution, which stipulated that suspects could not be forced to give evidence or testimony against themselves or their close relatives and that evidence obtained through psychological orphysical pressure or other unlawful methods had no legal force.
Article 78 stated that no facts derived from the details obtained by the court, the prosecution service orthe examining magistrate by means consisting of a criminal offence, other unlawful methods or in restriction of the rights of the persons concerned could be admitted as evidence.
In order to ensure the effectiveness andobjectivity of verification of complaints of torture and other unlawful methods of initial inquiry and investigation, in February 2010, a joint directive issued by the criminal prosecution agencies concerning cooperation among law enforcement agencies and civil society organizations in the verification of such complaints and the criminal prosecution of resultant cases was implemented with the participation of representatives of civil society.
On 14 March 2000, the Procurator-General issued an order on measures to be taken by the Procurator's Office in stepping up its campaign against the use of torture and other unlawful methods in the conduct of pre-trial inquiries and preliminary investigations, pursuant to the entry into force of the Procurator's Office Act.
Most recently, in their follow-up report to the Committee against Torture, the Canadian Government reinforced that Canada neither promotes norcondones the use of torture or other unlawful methods of investigation, yet rejected the recommendation of the Committee to modify the Ministerial Directions to ensure consistency with the Convention against Torture.44 The Statement recalled that the Ministerial Direction had required that procedural safeguards must be in place in order for its agencies to use and share information.
The Procurator-General issued an order on supplementary measures in compliance with the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, reaffirming the need to ensure more effective supervision by the procuratorial system with a view to preventing andsuppressing cases of the use of torture and other unlawful methods during initial inquiry and pre-trial investigation procedures and to ensure that the officials culpable of such offences were brought to justice.
Article 347 states that"Coercion of a suspect, accused person, injured party or witness to testify or of an expert to present his conclusions by means of threats,blackmail or other unlawful methods on the part of an investigator or the person conducting an initial inquiry, accompanied by the use of violence, bullying or torture shall be punishable by deprivation of freedom for a period of from three to eight years.
Firstly, this lawyer was imposed on him by the investigating authorities through the use of torture and other unlawful investigation methods.