Примеры использования Partial non-observance на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The source also concludes that Mr. Alkhodr's deprivation of liberty is in total or partial non-observance of the guarantees inherent to the right to a fair trial.
The total or partial non-observance of the relevant international standards contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights relating to the right to a fair trial can be of such gravity so as to confer on the deprivation of liberty, of whatever kind, an arbitrary character.
Source's contention as to the arbitrariness of the defendants' detention as a result of total or partial non-observance of their right to a fair trial.
The total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments is of such gravity as to give the deprivation of liberty an arbitrary character;
In addition, the source contends that Liu Xianbin's deprivation of liberty is in total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial.
When the total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial, established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the States concerned, is of such gravity as to give the deprivation of liberty an arbitrary character category III.
The source also submits that Liu Xianbin's detention is arbitrary since it is in total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial.
When the total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial, established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the States concerned, is of such gravity as to give the deprivation of liberty an arbitrary character category III.
Moreover, the source submits that the trials of Thagyi Maung Zeya andSithu Zeya are in total or partial non-observance of domestic and international norms related to the right to a fair trial.
When the total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial, established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the States concerned, is of such gravity as to give the deprivation of liberty an arbitrary character(category III);
Firstly, the Cuban Government categorically rejects the assertion made in the opinion that the deprivation of liberty of Mr. Gross is the result of the total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial Category III.
The source argues that inall the above-mentioned cases, there has been total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal which are of such gravity as to give the deprivation of liberty an arbitrary character.
In the light of the foregoing, the source concludes that Mr. Geloo's deprivation of liberty is arbitrary on the grounds that it lacked any legal basis during the period between 7 November 2006 and 30 October 2008 andit is in total or partial non-observance of the international legal norms relating to fair trial.
Furthermore, the source contends that Mr. Khudoynazarov's detention is arbitrary as it derives from partial non-observance of the guarantees enshrined in the right to a fair trial as provided inter alia under article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
When the total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial, established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the State concerned, is of such gravity as to give the deprivation of liberty an arbitrary character(category III);
The source considers that the lack of observance of international norms relating to a fair trial as described above is of such a grave nature as to amount,at a minimum, to partial non-observance of the international norms relating to a fair trial and therefore renders Mr. Shaqibel's detention arbitrary.
Category III applies when the total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial, established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the United States, is of such gravity as to give the deprivation of liberty an arbitrary character.
Pursuant to paragraph 8(c) of its revised methods of work, in dealing with situations of arbitrary deprivation of liberty,the Working Group shall consider the cases where the total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial is of such gravity as to give the deprivation of liberty an arbitrary character.
When the total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial, established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the States concerned, is of such gravity as to give the deprivation of liberty an arbitrary character(category III);
The Working Group will not consider proven the allegation that the detention is arbitrary owing to the serious total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial, as established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the State concerned.
When the total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial, established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the States concerned, is of such gravity as to give the deprivation of liberty an arbitrary character category III.
It remains to examinewhether Category III applies, namely whether in this case"the total or partial non-observance of the international norms relating to the right to a fair trial, spelled out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the States concerned, is of such gravity as to give the deprivation of liberty an arbitrary character.
When the complete or partial non-observance of the international standards relating to a fair trial set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the States concerned is of such gravity as to confer on the deprivation of liberty, of whatever kind, an arbitrary character category III.
Iii When the complete or partial non-observance of international standards relating to the right to a fair trial, as set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the States concerned, is of such gravity as to confer on the deprivation of liberty, of whatever kind, a arbitrary character Category III.
III. When the total or partial non-observance of the relevant international norms relating to the right to a fair trial, established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the States concerned, is of such gravity as to confer on the deprivation of liberty, of whatever kind, an arbitrary character category III.
III. When the complete or partial non-observance of the relevant international standards set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the States concerned relating to the right to a fair trial is of such gravity as to confer on the deprivation of liberty, of whatever kind, an arbitrary character Category III.
III. When the complete or partial non-observance of the relevant international standards set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the relevant international instruments accepted by the States concerned relating to the right to a fair trial is of such gravity as to confer on the deprivation of liberty, of whatever kind, an arbitrary character Category III.