Примеры использования Party has a duty на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
She argues that the State party has a duty to collect information about the use of torture.
Pursuant to article 2, paragraph 3, andarticle 26 of the Covenant, the State party has a duty to protect persons against such discrimination.
The State party has a duty to take measures to ensure the right to life of all persons, including pregnant women whose pregnancies are terminated.
The author recalls the Committee's jurisprudence andnotes that the State party has a duty to bring perpetrators to justice and to adapt the sentence to the seriousness of the human rights violation.
The State party has a duty to investigate thoroughly alleged violations of human rights, and in particular violations of the right to life, and to prosecute criminally, try and punish those held responsible for such violations.
He refers to the Committee's recent jurisprudence in the Benaziza case,in which it stated in its Views adopted on 27 July 2010 that"the State party has a duty not only to carry out thorough investigations of alleged violations of human rights, particularly enforced disappearances or violations of the right to life, but also to prosecute, try and punish anyone held to be responsible for such violations.
It recalls that the State party has a duty to investigate in good faith all allegations of violations of the Covenant made against it and its representatives and to furnish to the Committee the information available to it.
It is implicit in article 4, paragraph 2,of the Optional Protocol that the State party has a duty to investigate in good faith all allegations of violations of the Covenant made against it and its representatives and to provide the Committee with the information available to it.
However, the State party has a duty to review substantively, both on the basis of sufficiency of the evidence and of the law, the conviction and sentence such that the procedure allows for due consideration of the nature of the case.
It follows from article 4, paragraph 2,of the Optional Protocol that the State party has a duty to investigate in good faith all allegations of violations of the Covenant made against it and its representatives and to provide the Committee with the information available to it.
The Committee recalls that the State party has a duty to investigate in good faith all allegations of violations of the Covenant made against it and to furnish to the Committee the information available to it.
He refers to an individual communication concerning the State party in which the Committee declared that"the State party has a duty not only to carry out thorough investigations of alleged violations of human rights, particularly enforced disappearances or violations of the right to life, but also to prosecute, try and punish anyone held to be responsible for such violations.
The Committee recalls that the State party has a duty not only to conduct thorough investigations of alleged violations of human rights brought to the attention of its authorities, including in particular enforced disappearances and violations of the right to life, but also to prosecute, try and punish any person assumed to be responsible for such violations.
He cites the Committee's jurisprudence to the effect that the State party has a duty not only to carry out thorough investigations of alleged violations of human rights, particularly enforced disappearances or violations of the right to life, but also to prosecute, try and punish anyone held to be responsible for such violations.
The Committee recalls that the State party has a duty to investigate in good faith all allegations of violations of the Covenant made against it and its representatives and to furnish to the Committee the information available to it.
The Committee also recalls that the State party has a duty not only to carry out thorough investigations of alleged violations of human rights, particularly violations of the prohibition of torture, but also to prosecute, try and punish anyone held to be responsible for such violations.
The Committee nevertheless considers that the State party has a duty to thoroughly investigate alleged violations of human rights, particularly enforced disappearances and violations of the right to life, and to criminally prosecute, try and punish those deemed responsible for such violations.
The Committee recalls that the State party has a duty not only to carry out thorough investigations of alleged violations of human rights, particularly enforced disappearances or violations of the right to life, but also to prosecute, try and punish anyone held to be responsible for such violations.
The Committee recalls that the State party has a duty not only to carry out thorough investigations of alleged violations of human rights, particularly enforced disappearances or violations of the right to life, brought to the attention of its authorities, but also to prosecute, try and punish anyone held to be responsible for such violations.
In case No. 1779/2008(Mezine v. Algeria),the Committee recalled that the State party has a duty not only to carry out thorough investigations of alleged violations of human rights brought to the attention of its authorities, particularly enforced disappearances or violations of the right to life, but also to prosecute, try and punish anyone held to be responsible for such violations.
The author also recalls the Views of the Committee according to which:(i)the State party has a duty to carry out thorough investigations of alleged violations of human rights, particularly enforced disappearances or extrajudicial executions;(ii) if the State party does not conduct investigations into allegations of human rights violations, this may constitute a separate breach of article 2(para. 3) of the Covenant.
Under the Convention, States parties had a duty to take action against enforced disappearance.
States parties have a duty to observe the international legal requirements of nonrefoulement.
The State party had a duty to protect returnees from acts of discrimination; it should establish adequate programmes and activities with a view to stimulating a process of reconciliation and confidence-building.
The State party had a duty to protect that particularly vulnerable category of workers, especially since it had sufficient financial resources for that purpose.
In particular, we support the principle that States parties have a duty to refuse transfers where there is a substantial risk that they would.
The parties have a duty to take all necessary measures to minimize adverse impact on the environment.
The Committee recalled that the State party had a duty to investigate in good faith all allegations of violations of the Covenant made against it and its representatives and to furnish to the Committee the information available to it.
Mr. DIACONU said that the phrase“if the State party is to meet” did not convey the impression that the State party had a duty to meet the provisions of article 5 of the Convention.
In Nidia Erika Bautista de Arellana v. Colombia,the Committee noted that States parties have a duty to thoroughly investigate human rights violations and to try and punish those deemed responsible for such violations.