Примеры использования Party pointed out на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Party pointed out that asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease conditions were increasing in the country every day.
In its submission of 17 January 1997,the State party pointed out that since 3 February 1992 Mrs. Blanco Abad had been assigned up to seven lawyers to represent and defend her.
Another Party pointed out that the NAP process should complement cross-sectoral approaches, in order to ensure coherence and synergy.
However, the representatives of one non-ethnic party pointed out that the return of territorial autonomy to Kosovo could lead to similar demands for Vojvodina and to unrest among the population.
One Party pointed out that because its NCB and NFP are under one line ministry, their funding was dependent on whatever the line agency can allocate to support the operation of the body.
With regard to lessons learned, one Party pointed out that a lesson learned from the NAPA process was that in order to integrate the NAPs into existing national programmes, predictable and adequate funding is required.
Another Party pointed out the need for a more focused programme in areas where there is a strong and continuing commitment to innovation.
In its additional submission dated 7 May 2010, the State party pointed out that the Committee had asked the State party in its 7 October 2009 decision on admissibility to comment on the ruling of the civil division of the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal, which had found a miscarriage of justice on the part of the criminal courts.
The State party pointed out that less than 15 months had elapsed between the reopening of the investigation and the Constitutional Court's decision.
The State party pointed out that its processes had determined that it did not owe protection obligations to Mrs. Bakhtiyari and her children.
The State party pointed out that an alien who wishes to stay in Sweden must apply for a permit to the Migration Board or at least to indicate to the Board of his/her desire to stay.
The State party pointed out that usually it responds favourably to requests and its decision to do so was determined to be legal and consistent with the Charter up to the highest judicial level.
Finally, the State party pointed out that from the Committee's Views, it cannot be concluded that the author necessarily needs a new"criminal instance proceeding", in the way it is requested by the author.
On 26 December 2010, the State party pointed out that CINAT was not and had not been a party to the Baraket case, and was not a party to the present communication and was not authorized by the complainant to act as one.
One Party pointed out that there have been barriers, which need to be avoided in the NAP process, in terms of coordinating with agencies, with the GEF co-financing requirements and with the complexity of the assessment of the additional costs for adaptation.
The State party pointed out that since this was the first decision received by Belarus from an international instance, it would have to assess how to comply with the Views without breaching its obligations of non-interference with the judiciary.
One Party pointed out that significant gaps exist in terms of climate, population and socio-economic projections, but that these should not stop the commencement of planning that is pragmatic, flexible and capable of integrating emerging science as it becomes available.
The State party pointed out that, in July 1993, the European Court of Human Rights had declared all complaints of undue delay inadmissible on the grounds that domestic remedies had not been exhausted, if the remedy available under articles 292 et seq. of the Organization of Justice Act had not been used.
On 8 October 2008, the State party pointed out that the new circumstances concerning the disappearance of the complainants' family members had never been presented to the domestic migration authorities, but were introduced for the first time in their complaint to the Committee, i.e. more than two years after their initial asylum application.
The State party pointed out that, while the author claims that she and her son went to Denmark on a two-week holiday to visit Mr. M. A., Mr. M. A. claims that they travelled to Denmark to settle there and that, after arriving in the State party, the author did not live with him because she had decided to seek a divorce and wished to return to the Philippines with her son.
In its observations dated 18 January 2001, the State party pointed out that the Barcelona Provincial Court had expressly declared that Mr. Rocco Piscioneri is a leader of a criminal organization involved in trafficking drugs and narcotics, and reminded the Committee of the serious nature of this type of activity, as highlighted in the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, which was referred to in the extradition proceedings.
Some Parties pointed out that assistance would be needed in this context.
The State party points out that an application for review of that decision is pending.
The State party points out that no appeal was lodged against this decision.
Some Parties pointed out the benefits of the NAPA process.
The State party points out that the Institute is a secular education institution and as such has its internal regulations, compulsory for both staff and students.
The State party points out that the authors did not avail themselves of the possibility to appeal against this order.
On the merits, the State party point out that the"Transitional Policy" is a sympathetic approach to the question of overstayer families, including their children.
In this connection, the State party points out that the imposition of the death penalty is not per se unlawful under the Covenant.
Furthermore, the State party points out that under articles 59 and 60 of the Constitution, the President of the Republic of Zambia can exercise the prerogative of mercy.