Примеры использования Potentially overlapping на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
There are potentially overlapping claims to economic rights over certain areas of the Arctic seabed.
Mr. Wilson stated, inter alia,that all four coastal States could have made potentially overlapping, separate submissions.
There are, for example, potentially overlapping reporting requirements within thematic and geographic areas.
Following a review of the information obtained during the technical missions,the"E4" Panels found that the potentially overlapping claims fell within one of three fact patterns.
Four individual claims that were identified as potentially overlapping with four"E4" claims assert new or greater losses than those claimed by the"E4" claimant.
In addition, the searches identified 287"E4" claims in the remaining"E4" instalments as potentially overlapping with 168 claims in category"C" and 203 claims in category"D.
In the case of one potentially overlapping claim, the individual withdrew his business loss claim, precluding its consideration as a potentially overlapping claim.
The searches identified 104"E4" claims with approved awards of compensation in the first seven instalments as potentially overlapping with 61 claims in category"C" and 70 claims in category"D.
Of these 22 claims, 10 claims had potentially overlapping claims for business losses in category"D" and 12 claims had related or potentially overlapping claims for business losses in category"E4.
The work of the Special Rapporteur in relation to these issues provides a good illustration of the way in which potentially overlapping mandates adjust to accommodate one another and to avoid unproductive duplication of effort.
In four of the potentially overlapping claims, the individual claimants withdrew their business loss claims andthe"E4" Panels considered that the potentially overlapping claims were not overlapping. .
The Palestinian individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the"E4" claim has provided evidence to support the claim for loss of stock.
The Panel reviewed the potentially overlapping claims in the fourthsecond group of overlapping claims as and when the information provided by the claimants permitted an initial determination to be made on the existence of overlap. .
The Panel directed the expert consultants to review each claim in the twenty-fifth instalment, and,where relevant, the potentially overlapping category"D" claim, in accordance with the verification and valuation methodology developed by the Panel.
The"E4" Panels reviewed the potentially overlapping claims in the first group of overlapping claims as and when the information provided by the claimants permitted an initial determination to be made on the existence of overlap as defined above.
The"E4" Panels also note that this type of"false positive" match is a risk inherent in conducting computer matching programmes used to identify potentially overlapping claims(see paragraph 6 above), a risk that is compounded by the transliteration of Arabic names into English.
In 19 of the individual claims identified as potentially overlapping with"E4" claims, the"E4" Panels consider that the relationship was mistakenly identified based on the similarity between the"E4" claimant's name and the individual's name and/or business names.
The Panel also notes that this type of"false positive" match is a risk inherent in conducting computer matching programmes used to identify potentially overlapping claims(see paragraph 6 of the Special Overlap Report), a risk that is compounded by the transliteration of Arabic names into English.
In 9 of the individual claims identified as potentially overlapping with"E4" claims, the"E4" Panels consider that the claims were not overlapping as the individual claimants were claiming losses that were related to the"E4" claimant but were not overlapping losses.
Nine individual claims that had been identified as potentially overlapping with eight"E4" claims, included losses that had not been claimed by the"E4" claimant.
In twofive of the individual claims identified as potentially overlapping with"E4" claims, the merged"E4" Panel considers that the claim wass were not overlapping as the individual claimant was weres claiming losses that were related to the"E4" claimant companies but were not overlapping losses.
The individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the"E4" claim has provided evidence in the form of audited financial statements.
In 22 of the individual claims identified as potentially overlapping with"E4" claims, the Panel considers that the"E4" claimant's business and the individual claimant's business were totally separate and distinct businesses that had been operating using the same trading name or business licence.
Three individual claims that had been identified as potentially overlapping with three"E4" claims did not assert any new losses and did not provide any new evidence.
The individual claimants whose claims had been identified as potentially overlapping with the"E4" claims asserted new losses in addition to those asserted by the"E4" claimants.
The individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the"E4" claim provided evidence in the form of financial statements, contracts and purchase receipts.
The individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the"E4" claim provided additional evidence and claimed for losses in addition to those losses claimed by the"E4" claimant.
The individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the"E4" claim provided additional evidence and claimed for losses in addition to those losses claimed by the"E4" claimant.
The individual claimants whose claims had been identified as potentially overlapping with the"E4" claims asserted new losses in addition to those asserted by the"E4" claimants and provided evidence in the form of financial statements.
The individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with"E4" claimant Al Jehad Auto Spare Parts& Auto Tyres Co. had asserted a tangible property loss not asserted in the"E4" claim.