Примеры использования Preceding two full на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Amount of contributions due from it for the preceding two full years.
By“preceding two full years” was meant the preceding two full calendar years.
Interpretation of"contributions due for the preceding two full years" under the current methodology.
With regard to paragraph 6, a State party should not have the right to vote if the amount of its arrears equalled orexceeded the amount of its contributions due for the preceding two full years.
He also noted that the Secretariat's practice of calculating the amount of contributions due for the preceding two full years in gross terms was not set out in the financial rules but had been consistently reported to the Assembly.
The minimum payments necessary to reduce the amounts owed by those Member States on their contributions so thatthey remain below the gross amount owed for the preceding two full years(1996-1997) are the following.
The second relates to the interpretation of"the amount of contributions due from it for the preceding two full years" and the third is the distinction between"gross" and"net" amounts in the determination of arrears and contributions due.
The minimum payments necessary to reduce the amounts owed by those Member States on their contributions so thatthey remain below the gross amount owed for the preceding two full years(1995-1996) are the following.
Although Article 19 is silent on how the phrase“preceding two full years” should be interpreted, in line with the interpretation of“arrears” under the current provisions of regulation 5.4, contributions due for the preceding two full years has also, since 1950, been interpreted andapplied to mean the preceding two full calendar years.
This would involve a comparison of the arrears, as calculated on a net basis,to contributions due and payable for the preceding two full years, also calculated on a net basis.
A member of the Assembly which is in arrears in the payment of its financial contributions to the Authority shall have no vote if the amount ofits arrears equals or exceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two full years.
In line with the interpretation of"arrears" under the current provisions of financial regulation 5.4, however,contributions due for the preceding two full years have also, since 1950, been interpreted and applied to mean the preceding two full calendar years.
Should the General Assembly decide on a biannual application of Article 19, arrears(as redefined) on 1 July could still be compared with contributions andadvances payable for the preceding two full calendar years.
The Assistant Secretary-General also noted that the Secretariat's practice of calculating the amount of contributions due for the preceding two full years in gross terms is not set out in the Financial Rules, but has been consistently reported to the Assembly.
A member of the Organization which is in arrears in the payment of its assessed contribution to the Organization shall have no vote in the Organization if the amount of its arrears equals orexceeds the amount of the contribution due from it for the preceding two full years.
The Committee also considered the possibility of comparing arrears with the amount actually assessed and payable for the preceding two full years for the purposes of applying Article 19, that is to say, comparing“net” arrears with“net” assessments.
In accordance with the Convention and the Rules of Procedure of the Assembly of the Authority, members whose arrears equalled orexceeded the amount of their assessed contributions for the preceding two full years would lose their vote.
That, if a Member is in arrears in the payment of its financial contributions to the Organization in an amount which equals orexceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two full years at the time of the opening of the World Health Assembly in any future year, the Assembly shall consider, in accordance with Article 7 of the Constitution, whether or not the right of vote of such a Member shall be suspended.
Under the current methodology, however, a Member State is considered to fall under the provisions of Article 19 if its"arrears" as of 1 January of a given year equals orexceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two full years.
Thus, for example, only those contributions that fell due and payable between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 1997 were included in the amount of the contributions due for the preceding two full years for purposes of calculations for Article 19 as at 1 January 1998.
A Member of the United Nations which is in arrears in the payment of its financial contributions to the Organization shall have no vote in the General Assembly if the amount of its arrears equals orexceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two full years.
Thus, for example, only those contributions that fell due and payable between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2000 were included in the amount of the contributions due for the preceding two full years for purposes of calculating Article 19 as at 1 January 2001.
A State Party which is in arrears in the payment of its financial contributions towards the costs of the Court shall have no vote in the Assembly and in the Bureau if the amount of its arrears equals orexceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two full years.
Measures to tighten the application of Article 19 could include the semi-annual calculation of arrears and application of Article 19,as well as the comparison of arrears with the amount actually assessed and payable for the preceding two full years; that“net” approach would better reflect the true position of Member States' payments.
Article 19 of the Charter provides that a Member of the United Nations which is in arrears in the payment of its financial contributions to the Organization shall have no vote in the General Assembly if the amount ofits arrears equals or exceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two full years.
At its fifty-eighth session the Committee had considered further two proposals which would accelerate the application of Article 19: applying it more often or at a different time; andchanging the definition of“the amount of the contributions due… for the preceding two full years” from gross to net assessments.
I should like to remind delegations that, under Article 19 of the Charter, a Member of the United Nations which is in arrears in the payment of its financial contributions to the Organization shall have no vote in the General Assembly if the amount of its arrears equals orexceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two full years.
A Member of the United Nations which is in arrears in the payment of its financial contributions to the Organization shall have no vote in the General Assembly if the amount of its arrears equals orexceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two full years…" emphasis added.
I would like to remind delegations that, under Article 19 of the Charter, a Member of the United Nations that is in arrears in the payment of its financial contributions to the Organization shall have no vote in the General Assembly if the amount of its arrears equals orexceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two full years.
He reminded States Parties of the provisions of article 184 of the Convention and rule 80 of the Rules of Procedure of the Assembly, which provided that a member of the Authority in arrears in the payment of its financial contribution to the Authority shall have no vote if the amount of its arrears equals orexceeds the amount of the contribution due from it for the preceding two full years.