Примеры использования Previous replies на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
We refer you to our previous replies in this connection.
The expert from Denmark said that it was a pleasure to work with the system,once he got used to it, and having previous replies available saved time.
The previous replies have already indicated that none of the listed individuals or entities have been detected inside the Arab Republic of Egypt.
We have made our position on this matter clear in all our previous replies, and those may be consulted.
On another note,remittance systems such as hawalah are subject to the same restrictions and monitoring procedures referred to in the previous replies. .
An additional problem with previous replies was that lists of standards and lists of source categories provided by Parties were often confusing, unwieldy and difficult to interpret.
Yet he knows better than anyone that those two resolutions are political and have nothing to do with human rights, but simply serve as a pretext,as mentioned in our previous replies to his reports.
For example, previous replies provided by the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine about lack of criminal record on the name of Platon, a document that was requested when the businessman asked the change of his surname from Platon in Kobalev.
In many cases, the Survey is completed by a junior official with no previous experience in criminal justice statistics who is, therefore,unable to provide any quality control or comparisons with previous replies.
In this regard, we should point out that all Iraq's previous replies contain an extensive account of these matters, and Iraq has submitted a document concerning the manner of treatment of the subject of minorities in Iraq, namely, document E/CN.4/Sub.2/1994/54.
The Commission called upon the States parties to the Convention that had not yet replied to the questionnaire to do so as soon as possible or, to the extent necessary,to inform the Secretariat about any new developments since their previous replies to the questionnaire.
By recalling the previous replies under paras 218-219, Italian Authorities recall as follows: In the conversion into law of Legislative Decree 78/2009 containing anti-crisis measures, specific provisions were introduced for the"declaration of family assistance and support activities" art. 1-ter, Act No. 102/2009.
The Commission urged the secretariat to intensify its efforts to obtain information necessary for preparing the report and for that purpose to recirculate the questionnaire to the States parties to the Convention that had not yet replied to the questionnaire requesting them to reply as soon as possible or, to the extent necessary,to inform the secretariat about any new developments since their previous replies to the questionnaire.
In addition to previous replies received from Member States that were included in the report of the Secretary-General(A/58/185 and Add.1), the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights received a reply from the Government of Cuba on 10 October 2003, which is reproduced in section II below.
The Commission requested the secretariat to intensify its efforts to obtain the information necessary to make progress on the matter and to that end requested that the secretariat recirculate the questionnaire to the States parties to the New York Convention requesting those which had not yet replied to do so as soon as possible andrequesting the States parties that had already replied to inform the secretariat about any new developments since their previous replies.
Affirming the content of those reports and Egypt's previous replies to the distinguished Committee, we may add that, under the Egyptian legal system and in accordance with article 93 of the Constitution, the human rights instruments to which Egypt is a party are regarded as Egyptian laws once the procedures for their ratification are complete and once the instruments concerned have been published, in Arabic, in the Official Gazette.
At its thirty-fifth and thirty-sixth sessions, the Commission requested the Secretariat to intensify its efforts to obtain information necessary to make progress on the project and for that purpose to recirculate the questionnaire to the States parties requesting those which had not replied to it to do so as soon as possible andrequesting the States parties that had already replied to inform the Secretariat about any new developments since their previous replies.
See previous reply.
C1: On subparagraph(a), the State party repeats its previous reply.
This was made clear during the fifty-second session of the General Assembly, in the previous reply of the Arab States on this subject, which appeared in document A/52/312.
On subparagraphs(a) and(b):The State party repeats its previous reply see CCPR/C/UZB/CO/3/Add.1, paras. 14- 17 and 19.
C1: The State party repeats its previous reply and provides no information on the specific issues as requested in the Rapporteur's letter of 13 November 2012.
C2: The State party repeats its previous reply and provided no information on the measures taken to implement the Committee's recommendations.
On 27 June 2011,the State party reiterates the information contained in its previous reply of December 2010 on the measures taken to give effect to the Committee's opinion.
On subparagraph(c): The State party repeats its previous reply(see CCPR/C/UZB/CO/3/Add.1, paras. 30 and 31) that the Code of Criminal Procedure provides for an individual's rehabilitation, including its grounds and consequences, as well as the procedure for compensation and the restoration of other rights.
The State party repeats its previous reply that it would not be possible to enact bill No. 38/1993 Coll. so as to provide a remedy to persons for infringement of their rights under the Covenant, because that would require an amendment of the Constitution.
During the period under review, the Government provided information on this case,reiterating its previous reply of 6 December 1994 that, despite minute investigations conducted by the competent authorities at the time, they were unable to identify the person concerned or to identify a case of disappearance in the place and on the date in question.
The State party repeats its previous reply(CCPR/C/LTU/Q/3/Add.1, para. 39) on the pretrial investigation in criminal case No. 01-2-00016-10 regarding the possible transportation and imprisonment on the territory of persons detained by the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States of America, which was terminated on 14 January 2011, after finding that no criminal offence was committed.
On subparagraph(f): The State party repeats its previous reply(see CCPR/C/UZB/CO/3/Add.1, paras. 43- 48) on the prohibition of coercion of a suspect, accused person, defendant, victim, witness or other person involved in a case into giving testimony by means of violence, threats, infringement of their rights or by other illegal measures, as well as on the inadmissibility of evidence obtained by use of any of the above unlawful means.
The previous reply is applicable to this question.