Примеры использования Prosecutor informed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
About detention for more than 3 hours, and the prosecutor informed the embassy(consulate) of the State.
The Prosecutor informed the author that her claims had not been confirmed and her allegations had not been verified.
With respect to the case of Gabriel Carabulea,the military prosecutor informed the Special Rapporteur that he had found no reason to reopen the case.
The Prosecutor informed the Security Council that the Office was proceeding with its second and third Darfur investigations.
The engagement ended after UNAMID reinforcements reached the scene. On 8 September,the Special Prosecutor informed UNAMID that he had initiated an investigation into the attack.
Indeed, the District Prosecutor informed him on 3 July 1997 that he could file petitions with the above professional bodies.
Regarding the investigation and prosecution of those responsible for the attacks on civilians in North and South Darfur in February and March,the General Prosecutor informed UNAMID that 1,000 cases had been registered in both states, 6 of which had been referred to the Special Court.
The Prosecutor informed the Advisory Committee that, of necessity, the responsibility for protection of witnesses for the prosecution lies with his Office.
Although many of the cases are still pending,the Public Prosecutor informed the Special Rapporteur that these prosecutions led to 15 convictions and 120 acquittals.
Given the author's testimony about the traces of gunshot wounds on Mrs. Amirova' body, the investigator should have interrogated witnesses. On 28 March 2001, the investigation was assigned to an investigator of the Grozny Prosecutor's Office.On 4 April 2001, the Military Prosecutor informed the author that the criminal investigation of his wife's case had been officially resumed.
In a letter of 10 July 2001, the Public Prosecutor informed DRC that he did not see any reason for changing the police decision.
In November 1989, the author requested the public prosecutor of the East Finland Court of Appeal to begin a criminal investigation against the tax authorities.On 3 April 1990, the prosecutor informed the author that, after a preliminary investigation, he had decided not to prosecute.
By letter dated 6 November 1996 the State Prosecutor informed the DRC that he did not see any reason to overrule the police decision.
At least one prosecutor informed the Special Rapporteur that there is a need to create a judicial police force if the prosecutors are to control police abuse.
The source asserts that Mr. Choi did not meet his attorney until the day before the trial, which seems highly likely,since the Government has said that the prosecutor informed him of the appointment of his counsel on 18 April 2003, while the trial was held on 22 April 2003.
As a result, in March 2011, the Prosecutor informed the Perišić Trial Chamber that the Supreme Defence Council documents could be made public.
The author reiterates that the proceedings for torture have been dropped following the dismissal of the case against the alleged perpetrators.On 7 May 2008, the prosecutor informed the author that no further remedies or other procedural means of appealing the dismissal decision were available.
By a letter of 3 March 1992, the prosecutor informed the author that he would look into the claim of absence of a competent interpreter, but he never received any reply.
However, the victim's family repeatedly contacted the competent authorities concerning Kamel Rakik's disappearance, andthe State party itself acknowledged that it had detained the victim in a letter dated 21 February 1998, in which the prosecutor informed Kamel Rakik's father that his son had been"arrested by members of the security services and taken to the Algiers police station.
When a foreigner was arrested in Lithuania, the prosecutor informed the relevant diplomatic or consular post only at the request of the arrested person.
In December 2006, the Prosecutor informed the Security Council that he intends to request the Trial Chambers for orders for the transfer to national jurisdictions of 17 accused persons, including the 12 who are still at large.
The Trial Chamber instructed the Prosecutor to conduct an investigation into the circumstances surrounding this testimony.On 8 May 1997, the Prosecutor informed the Judges that it did not consider the case of witness L- whose name was now disclosed as Dragan Opačić- to be an appropriate one for prosecution for false testimony under rule 91.
In December 2006, the Prosecutor informed the Security Council that he intends to request the Trial Chambers to transfer to national jurisdictions the cases of 17 accused persons for trial, including those who are still at large.
On 18 July 2001, after the first instance court judgment, the author submitted a written application to the prosecutor of Minsk District requesting her son's clothes that had been seized as evidence.On 27 July 2001, the prosecutor informed that the clothes retained as evidence might be returned only after the sentence entered into force and the court issued a ruling regarding the evidence.
The author states that the public prosecutor informed the investigating magistrate on 24 October 1991 that the author had been summoned, whereas the summons was only served upon him on 25 October 1991.
During his meeting with Mr. Ivanisević, the President again expressed his satisfaction about the cooperation between the Republic of Croatia and the Tribunal and, in that respect,asserted that as soon as the prosecutor informed him"that once all pending requests for cooperation have been met, he shall be sure to inform the Security Council that Croatia has complied with all its obligations towards the Tribunal."21.
As to Muammar Qadhafi, the Prosecutor informed the Council that the Registry of the Court was following the formal procedures required to obtain legal certification of his death so that the Court could end the case against him.
They claimed that the police clubbed their son with a blunt metal object, thereby causing his death, and subsequently threw his corpse out of the window to conceal the act. On 12 August andon 5 December 1994, the deputy public prosecutor informed the complainants that no sufficient grounds existed for instituting criminal proceedings, and advised them to file a criminal report with the public prosecutor's office, submitting the evidence on which their suspicion was based.
As a result, in March 2011, the Prosecutor informed the Perišić Trial Chamber that the Supreme Defence Council documents could be made public. The Office of the Prosecutor welcomes this important development.
In February 2009, the Office of the Public Prosecutor informed the Ministry of Justice that there were only two allegations on record.