Примеры использования Queries were raised на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Queries were raised about the change of the name of subprogramme 3.
It is further noted that, during the fourth andfifth sessions of the Open-ended Working Group, queries were raised as to the applicability of the Basel Convention to abandoned ships.
Queries were raised regarding the remaining obstacles to knowledge management.
In respect of subprogramme 4,Mine action coordination, queries were raised on the link between the indicator of achievement and the expected accomplishment presented in table 5.18.
Queries were raised on the overall level of resources proposed, namely, $2,468.5 million.
The view was expressed that the current efforts of the Department to observe multilingualism were insufficient, and queries were raised regarding additional measures taken by the Department to ensure language parity.
Queries were raised regarding the proposed deletion of text related to the realignment of subprogrammes under programme 25.
On subprogramme 5,Progressive harmonization and unification of the law of international trade, queries were raised on the methods regarding the in-depth collection of data for the formulated indicators of achievement reflected in table 8.18.
Queries were raised on the mechanisms for the involvement of the Human Rights Council in the review of the proposed strategic framework.
In addition, queries were raised regarding who was going to evaluate the categorization and capacity of the indicators.
Queries were raised on the level of support provided by the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space to its new members.
In this respect, queries were raised about what issues were envisioned and at what levels those efforts would be carried out.
Queries were raised regarding some of the report's results on the varying degree of the visibility of the Department and the relatively low level of resources allocated to it.
In that connection, queries were raised on what mechanism existed in ECLAC to expand the framework to other areas, such as legislative and operational activities.
Queries were raised on the termination of outputs, as well as justifications for the proposed increase in the number of posts and whether redeployment options had been explored.
Queries were raised about the administrative arrangements relating to MSAs, including whether, statistically, the resources were considered to be part of UNDP resources.
Queries were raised about the additional expected accomplishments and indicators of achievements proposed and about the method of measurement to quantify satisfaction by States Parties.
Queries were raised, however, on some revisions of expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement made on the basis of the programme budget for the biennium 2002-2003.
Queries were raised about whether it was necessary to list all applicable legislative mandates in the proposal, or whether there was a different way of simply indicating the new mandates for the upcoming period.
Queries were raised regarding the utilization of the funds available under the Window I. All observations were duly recorded and taken into account by the ITC secretariat, and this is reflected in the progress reports on the programmes.
Queries were raised about the level of the regular resource expenditures forecast in the biennial support budget, which did not change with the forecast reduction in income and programme expenditures.
Queries were raised on how the United Nations provided advisory services to Governments and why specific mention was made to some of the sectors in Agenda 21 and the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation and not others.
Queries were raised on the indicator proposed for South-South cooperation, and the view was expressed that only those forums that dealt with South-South cooperation in support of NEPAD should be recorded.
Queries were raised about the degree of completion of missions' start-up kits and on measures to be taken to increase the number of Member States contributing to the standby arrangements, referred to in paragraphs 3.12 and 3.17, respectively.
In that regard, queries were raised as to the current priority areas for international cooperation on the peaceful uses of outer space, in particular the extent of the programme's cooperation with the International Telecommunication Union.
Queries were raised as to the emphasis on the areas of human rights and humanitarian affairs and common support services, as reflected in terms of percentage resource change outlined in the annex to document A/57/85.
Queries were raised concerning the methodology UNEP used to measure results obtained and whether, in formulating its programme for the period 2010-2011, the lessons learned had been taken into account in arriving at the new measures.
Queries were raised about the comments made in the mission report on the relationship between headquarters and the country offices, the role of the Government in the development of the country strategy note in Malawi, and the measurement of programme success.
Queries were raised on progress in undertaking joint strategic evaluations and on the concept of rating of agencies mentioned on page 70 of the publication"Measuring and Managing Results: Lessons for Development Cooperation.
Queries were raised about problems faced in joint programming; maintenance of the individual identity of participating organizations; the time-frame for collaborative action; incorporation of global conference goals in the UNDAF; and phasing out of less strategic activities.