Примеры использования Regulatory action had been taken на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Committee confirmed that the final regulatory action had been taken to protect the environment.
In reviewing the notification of final regulatory action by the European Community to ban alachloras a pesticide and the supporting documentation, the Chemical Review Committee concluded at its fourth session that the regulatory action had been taken in order to protect human health and the environment.
The Committee confirmed that the final regulatory action had been taken to protect human health and the environment.
The Committee thus confirmed that the final regulatory action had been taken to protect human health.
The Committee established that the final regulatory action had been taken on the basis of a risk evaluation and that the evaluation had been based on a review of scientific data.
On that basis,the Committee established that the final regulatory action had been taken as a consequence of risk evaluation.
The Committee established that the final regulatory action had been taken as a consequence of a risk evaluation and that the evaluation had been based on a review of scientific data.
With regard to Annex II to the Convention,she said that the notification explained that the regulatory action had been taken to protect the environment; thus, the criterion in paragraph(a) of Annex II had been met.
Some members said that they were unsure that the regulatory action had been taken relative to conditions prevailing in Sweden, as insufficient information had been provided.
With regard to Annex II,the notification from Canada explained that the regulatory action had been taken to protect the environment: thus the criterion in Annex II(a) had been met.
The Chemical Review Committee established that the final regulatory action had been taken on the basis of a risk evaluation and that the evaluation had been based on reviews of scientific data.
With regard to Annex II,the notification had clearly indicated that the regulatory action had been taken to protect human health: thus the criterion in Annex II(a) had been met.
Based on this,the Committee established that the final regulatory action had been taken on the basis of risk evaluation and that the evaluation had been based on a review of scientific data.
With regard to Annex II,the notification from Sri Lanka explained that the regulatory action had been taken to protect human health: thus the criterion in Annex II(a) had been met.
With regard to Annex II,the notification explained that the regulatory action had been taken to protect human health: thus the criterion in Annex II(a) had been met.
With regard to Annex II,the notification explained that the regulatory action had been taken to protect human health: thus the criterion in Annex II(a) had been met.
With regard to Annex II,the notification explained that the regulatory action had been taken to protect human health and the environment: thus the criterion in Annex II(a) had been met.
With regard to Annex II to the Convention,he said that the notification explained that the regulatory action had been taken to protect human health; thus, the criterion in paragraph(a) of Annex II had been met.
With regard to Annex II to the Convention,she said that the notification from Jordan explained that the regulatory action had been taken to protect human health; thus, the criterion set out in paragraph(a) of Annex II had been met.
With regard to Annex II to the Convention,she said that the notification from Canada explained that the regulatory action had been taken to protect human health and the environment; thus, the criterion in paragraph(a) of Annex II had been met.
Establish that the final regulatory action has been taken as a consequence of a risk evaluation.
Confirm that the final regulatory action has been taken in order to protect human health or the environment.
The Committee established that the final regulatory actions had been taken on the basis of risk evaluations and that those evaluations had been based on a review of scientific data.
Annex II of the Convention sets out the criteria for listing banned or severely restricted chemicals in Annex III. Paragraph(b) of Annex II states that, in reviewing the notifications forwarded to it,the Chemical Review Committee shall"Establish that the final regulatory action has been taken as a consequence of a risk evaluation.
It was noted that, where regulatory actions had been taken many years before, it was often difficult or impossible for a country to provide the relevant supporting documentation regarding the original risk evaluation with their notifications, especially at times when risk evaluations as such had not been used as a basis for the regulatory action. .
In reviewing the notifications of final regulatory action by Brazil to ban and the European Union to severely restrict methamidophos as a pesticide, together with the supporting documentation provided by those parties,the Committee was able to confirm that the final regulatory actions had been taken to protect human health and in the case of the European Union also the environment.
In reviewing the notifications of final regulatory action by the European Community to ban chrysotile asbestos and the notifications by Australia and Chile to severely restrict chrysotile asbestos, together with the supporting documentary information provided by those Parties,the Chemical Review Committee was able to confirm that the regulatory actions had been taken in order to protect human health.
In reviewing the notifications of final regulatory action by the European Community and Canada to severely restrict tributyl tin compounds, together with the supporting documentary information provided by those Parties,the Chemical Review Committee was able to confirm that the regulatory actions had been taken in order to protect both human health and the environment in the case of the European Community and the environment in that of Canada.
In reviewing the notifications of final regulatory action by the European Community and Canada to severely restrict tributyl tin compounds, together with the supporting documentary information provided by those Parties,the Chemical Review Committee was able to confirm that the regulatory actions had been taken in order to protect both human health and the environment in the case of the European Community and the environment in that of Canada.