Примеры использования Relevant protocols to the treaty на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
SCO calls upon all nuclear-weapon States to sign the relevant protocols to the Treaty on a Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone in Central Asia and take steps towards its actual establishment.
They expressed the hope that the nuclear-weapon States would be able to accede to the relevant Protocols to the Treaty to ensure its success.
Encourages States that have ratified the relevant protocols to the Treaty of Tlatelolco to review any reservation in this regard in accordance with Action 9 of the 2010 NPT Review Conference Final Document;
In this regard, we are jointly announcing today our intention to sign the relevant protocols to the Treaty of Rarotonga in the first half of 1996.
Encourages States that have ratified the relevant Protocols to the Treaty of Tlatelolco to review any reservation in this regard, in accordance with action 9 of the Final Document of the 2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
We call on other nuclear-weapon States which have not yet ratified the relevant protocols to the Treaty of Pelindaba to do so as soon as possible.
We have the honour to enclose herewith a statement issued jointly on 22 March 1996 from the Governments of France, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland andthe United States of America concerning their intention to sign the relevant protocols to the Treaty of Rarotonga on 25 March 1996.
All nuclear-weapon States have signed the relevant protocols to the Treaty. China and France have also ratified them.
In this regard, we welcome the recent announcement by France, the United Kingdom andthe United States of America of their intention to sign the relevant protocols to the Treaty of Rarotonga in the first half of 1996.
We are equally pleased that all the nuclear-weapon States have signed the relevant Protocols to the Treaty, and wish to give special recognition to France, which has already ratified the Protocols which apply to it.
Another step forward within the last few days was the joint announcement bythe Governments of France, the United Kingdom and the United States that they intend to sign the relevant Protocols to the Treaty of Rarotonga in the first half of 1996.
We wish to reiterate the importance of accession by all nuclear-weapon States to the relevant protocols to the Treaty of Rarotonga in order to provide meaning and to show leadership and commitment on the part of these States in the achievement of the overall objectives of the disarmament regime.
Last Friday France, the United Kingdom andthe United States of America jointly announced their intention to sign the relevant Protocols to the Treaty of Rarotonga in the first half of 1996.
In that spirit,it reiterated its call to the nuclear-weapon States to reconsider the terms of their adherence to the relevant protocols to the Treaty of Tlatelolco, so as to provide complete and unconditional negative security assurancesto all countries in the region pending the achievement of nuclear disarmament.
Mr. Markram(South Africa): My Government welcomes the joint statement made today by the Governments of France, the United Kingdom andthe United States of their intention to sign the relevant Protocols to the Treaty of Rarotonga in the first half of 1996.
Tunisia is pleased atthe decision by France, the United Kingdom and the United States of America to sign the relevant protocols to the Treaty of Rarotonga in the first half of 1996, and we hope that similar support will be evidenced once the protocols annexed to the Treaty of Pelindaba are ready for signature.
We have the honour to enclose herewith a statement issued jointly on 20 October 1995 by the Governments of France, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland andthe United States of America concerning their intention to sign the relevant protocols to the Treaty of Rarotonga in the first half of 1996.
In this regard, we are jointly announcing today our intention to sign the relevant Protocols to the Treaty of Rarotonga in the first half of 1996.
We appreciate the announcement by France, the United Kingdom andthe United States of America that they intend to sign the relevant Protocols to the Treaty of Rarotonga in the first half of 1996.
We have been pleased to note the joint announcement made on 20 October by the Governments of France, the United Kingdom andthe United States of their intention to sign the relevant Protocols to the Treaty of Rarotonga in 1996, thereby joining Russia and China as signatories to the Protocols. .
Mr. Cole(Australia): I have asked to speak in order to respond briefly to the welcome joint announcement madeearlier today by France, the United Kingdom and the United States of America of their intention to sign the relevant Protocols to the Treaty of Rarotonga in the first half of 1996, thereby joining Russia and China, which had previously signed and ratified the two Protocols open to them.
On the basis of this position,China signed and ratified the relevant protocols to the Treaties of Tlatelolco, Pelindaba, Rarotonga and the Antarctic.
It has signed and ratified all the relevant protocols to the treaties of Tlatelolco, Rarotonga and Pelindaba.
Since 2000, his Government had signed and ratified the relevant protocols to the Treaties of Raratonga and Pelindaba, which had established the South Pacific Nuclear-Free-Zone and the African Nuclear-Weapon-Free-Zone.
We urge the Nuclear Weapon States andany other States listed or mentioned in the relevant Protocols to the treaties establishing nuclear-weapon-free zones that have not yet signed or ratified the Protocols to do so as soon as possible.
We urge the nuclear-weapon States andany other State mentioned in the relevant protocols to the treaties that established nuclear-weapon-free zones that have not yet signed or ratified such protocols, to do so as a matter of priority;
We urge the nuclear-weapon States andany other States mentioned in the relevant protocols to the treaties that established nuclear-weapon-free zones that have neither signed nor ratified such protocols to do so as a matter of priority.
By signing the relevant protocols to the treaties establishing nuclear-weapon-free zones,the nuclear-weapon States undertake legally binding commitments not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against nuclear-weapon-free zone parties.