Примеры использования Rescind forthwith на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Israel, the occupying Power, should rescind forthwith its decision.
It seeks to consolidate its occupation and annexation, whereas the Security Council determined that the Israeli decision to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration in the occupied Syrian Golan Heights was null and void and without international legal effect, anddemanded that Israel should rescind forthwith its decision.
Calls upon the Government of India to respect the human rights of the Kashmiri people, rescind forthwith all repressive measures and endeavour to improve the situation in Kashmir;
Recalling Security Council resolution 497(1981) of 17 December 1981, in which the Council, inter alia, decided that the Israeli decision to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration in the occupied Syrian Golan was null and void and without international legal effect, anddemanded that Israel should rescind forthwith its decision.
Firmly emphasizes once more its demand that Israel,the occupying Power, rescind forthwith its illegal decision of 14 December 1981 to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the Syrian Golan, and its decision of 11 November 1991, which resulted in the effective annexation of that territory;
The Council recalled in particular Security Council resolution 497(1981), in which it decided, inter alia, that the decision of Israel to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the occupied Syrian Golan was null and void and without international legal effect, anddemanded that Israel rescind forthwith its decision.
The Secretary-General further recalls that in the same resolution, the Security Council demanded that Israel, the occupying Power,should rescind forthwith its decision, and determined that all the provisions of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,"continue to apply to the Syrian territory occupied by Israel since June 1967.
To comply with the relevant resolutions of the General Assembly and of the Security Council, particularly resolution 497(1981), in which the Council inter alia decided that the Israeli decision to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the occupied Syrian Golan was null and void and without international legal effect, and demanded that Israel, the occupying Power,should rescind forthwith its decision;
Calls upon Israel, the occupying Power, to comply with the relevant resolutions of the General Assembly, the Security Council and the Human Rights Council, particularly Security Council resolution 497(1981), in which the Council decided, inter alia, that the decision of Israel to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the occupied Syrian Golan is null and void and without international legal effect, anddemanded that Israel should rescind forthwith its decision;
Condemns Israel, the occupying Power, for its refusal to comply with the relevant resolutions on the occupied Syrian Golan, and in particular Security Council resolution 497(1981), in which the Council, inter alia, decided that the Israeli decision to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the occupied Syrian Arab Golan was null and void and without international legal effect and demanded that Israel, the occupying Power,should rescind forthwith its decision;
Strongly condemns Israel, the occupying Power, for its refusal to comply with the relevant resolutions of the General Assembly and the Security Council, particularly Council resolution 497(1981), in which the Council, inter alia, decided that the Israeli decision to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the occupied Syrian Arab Golan was null and void and without international legal effect and demanded that Israel, the occupying Power,should rescind forthwith its decisions;
Israel continues to occupy the Syrian Golan despite numerous resolutions of the Human Rights Council, for example, resolution 22/26, and of the Security Council calling for an end to the occupation, including resolution 497(1981), in which the Security Council decided that the decision of Israel to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the occupied Syrian Golan was null and void and without international legal effect and demanded that Israel,the occupying power, rescind forthwith its decision.
In its resolution 16/17, the Human Rights Council called upon Israel to comply with the relevant resolutions of the General Assembly, the Security Council and the Human Rights Council, in particular Security Council resolution 497(1981), in which the Security Council decided, inter alia, that the decision of Israel to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the occupied Syrian Golan was null and void and without international legal effect, anddemanded that Israel rescind forthwith its decision.
Such unlawful measures by Israel, the occupying Power, are unjustifiable under any pretext or circumstances, andthe decision to undertake them should be rescinded forthwith.
The resolution further determines that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel in that regard are null and void andmust be rescinded forthwith.
What is necessary is that both sides should help the United NationsPeacekeeping Force in Cyprus(UNFICYP) to arrange an agreed code of conduct and that your side's standing order to shoot to kill be rescinded forthwith.
The United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 478 on 20 August 1980, which declared that the Jerusalem Law is"a violation of international law", is"null and void andmust be rescinded forthwith.
Through resolution 50/22 A, the General Assembly determined that all legislative and administrative(measures and) actions taken by Israel that had altered or purported to alter the character and status of Jerusalem, in particular the so-called“Basic Law” on Jerusalem and the proclamation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, were null and void andmust be rescinded forthwith.
In its preamble, the draft resolution refers to all the resolutions adopted by the General Assembly since 1981 which stipulate categorically that all legislative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, with the aim of altering the legal status or the demographic nature of the Holy City of Al-Quds are null and void andmust be rescinded forthwith.
Similarly, the General Assembly has declared that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which have altered or purported to alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, in particular the so-called"basic law" on Jerusalem andthe proclamation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, were null and void and must be rescinded forthwith.
The Committee recalls the resolutions of the General Assembly, most recently that adopted in 1994 at its forty-ninth session, in which the Assembly determined that all legislative measures and actions that had altered or purported to alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, in particular the so-called"Basic Law" on Jerusalem and the proclamation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, were null and void andmust be rescinded forthwith.
We recall the strong messages conveyed at the recent emergency meeting of the Security Council calling for respect of this historic status quo, and we reiterate the Security Council's determination that all such measures by Israel, the occupying Power,"to alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, and in particular the recent'basic law' on Jerusalem,are null and void and must be rescinded forthwith.
Recalling also its resolution 36/120 E of 10 December 1981 and all subsequent resolutions, including resolution 56/31 of 3 December 2001, in which it, inter alia, determined that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which have altered or purported to alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, in particular the so-called" Basic Law" on Jerusalem and the proclamation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel,were null and void and must be rescinded forthwith.
Recalling also its resolution 36/120 E of 10 December 1981 and all its subsequent relevant resolutions, including resolution 56/31 of 3 December 2001, in which it, inter alia, determined that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which have altered or purported to alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, in particular the socalled" Basic Law" on Jerusalem and the proclamation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel,were null and void and must be rescinded forthwith.