Примеры использования Resort to countermeasures на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Under the 1992 text, any offer would have to precede resort to countermeasures.
The question of resort to countermeasures in response to a wrongful act of an international organization required careful analysis.
The purpose of these preconditions is to reduce the likelihood of premature, andthus improper, resort to countermeasures.
It is difficult to imagine that resort to countermeasures could be considered to be part of negotiation or diplomacy.
We believe that this system of compulsory arbitration would impose an unacceptable cost on injured States that must resort to countermeasures.
Люди также переводят
It should be the policy of international law to discourage resort to countermeasures, but in this respect the Draft articles may tend to encourage them.
The Commission also considered the question of clauses relating to the settlement of disputes with specific reference to the issue of resort to countermeasures.
The rules of the organization determined whether an organization could resort to countermeasures against its members or be the target of countermeasures by them.
A second step was article 5, as adopted on first reading,which entitles all States to demand cessation/reparation and eventually resort to countermeasures.
Moreover, in our view an international organization may resort to countermeasures only if such measures are in conformity with its constituent instrument.
Resort to countermeasures is an option only when there has been no satisfactory response to the request addressed to the State committing the violation.
Once again, his delegation believed that the extent to which an international organization might resort to countermeasures depended on the purpose and mandate of the organization.
Immediate resort to countermeasures would be clearly incompatible with a specific treaty or a compromissary clause providing for the arbitration of legal disputes not settled by diplomacy.
It was regrettable that the draft articles did not address the question of resort to countermeasures by an injured international organization against a State that had committed a wrongful act.
In support of article 48, the view was expressed that the provision,which restricted the conditions under which an injured State might resort to countermeasures, was well balanced.
The United States believes that article 50's prohibitions on the resort to countermeasures do not in all cases reflect customary international law and may serve to magnify rather than resolve disputes.
At one point, application of the requirement to a particular case may be the subject of a disagreement between the parties,which may be followed by resort to countermeasures and the beginning of their dispute thereon.
Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, it requires that resort to countermeasures be necessary in order to induce the wrongdoing State to comply with its obligations under articles 41 to 46.
Restrictions provided for in articles 51 to 56 would in any event apply, but the question may be asked whether States orinternational organizations which are not injured within the meaning of article 43 may resort to countermeasures at all.
As was noted with regard to States,the rules of the responsible organization may restrict resort to countermeasures by an injured organization which is a member of the former organization.
However, in order to prevent abuses, it would be prudent for the Commission not only to clarify the rules of customary international law, butalso to develop clear rules limiting the circumstances under which States could resort to countermeasures.
While an international organization might, resort to countermeasures under certain circumstances, such measures were elements of decentralized law enforcement that were inherent to inter-State relations.
With respect to draft article 52,several members emphasized the decisive role of the rules of the organization in determining whether an organization could resort to countermeasures against its members or be the target of countermeasures by them.
Further questions that arise in this context concern the resort to countermeasures by an international organization against a State and the reverse case of countermeasures taken by a State against an organization.
Consideration of article 13 should be systematically linked with that of article 14, since resort to the countermeasures listed in article 14 would in practice constitute resort to countermeasures out of proportion to the initial offence.
The article could then start out by stating that States are not entitled to resort to countermeasures unless the following conditions are fulfilled, andthen go on to indicate that lawful resort to countermeasures is conditional upon.
On the other hand, in order to prevent abuses, it would be prudent for the Commission not only to clarify the rules of customary international law, butalso to develop clear rules limiting the circumstances under which States could resort to countermeasures.
The United Kingdom Government believes that it is correct in principle, and desirable as a matter of policy,that a State should not resort to countermeasures after a lapse of time which clearly implies that the State has waived its right to do so.
The broad language of draft article 17 raised problems, for it was not restricted to redress for indirect injury but also included the measures envisaged underthe regime of State responsibility for redressing direct injuries, including resort to countermeasures.
States which are entitled to invoke the responsibility of a State responsible for a"serious breach" may resort to countermeasures irrespective of a request of an injured State, or of the conditions attaching to countermeasures by that injured State. France.