Примеры использования Should be liable на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Importer should be liable for any transfer of arms to any such groups.
Properties deriving from proceeds of crime should be liable to confiscation;
They should be liable to prosecution for any breaches of the law;
In the meantime, if damage did occur, the operator, and not the State, should be liable.
The liable entities: Who should be liable and for what?
In the case of detention facilities run by private companies, it was stressed that both the company and the State should be liable.
In any event, the Company should be liable for any special or critical, loss or injury.
At security level 1, all those seeking to board a ship should be liable to search.
One delegation was of the view that the experts should be liable for statements made, even when they were not connected with their functions.
His delegation believed that acts of terrorism should not be regarded as political crimes and that their perpetrators should be liable to extradition.
One suggestion was that the carrier should be liable for the entire period for which it arranged the additional carriage on behalf of the shipper.
Finally, it was proposed that violations of Article 233 b should be liable to public indictment.
Thus, given that France held the view that less serious acts should be liable to criminal penalties, its interpretation of article 1 of the Convention was quite similar to that recommended by the Committee.
As long as such entities have the legal capacity to perform legal actions,conclude agreements, etc., they should be liable for corruption.
The operator should be liable for the accuracy of the data it holds and all records should be revalidated every year because of the frequency with which trademarks are assigned or abandoned.
He would also prefer the deletion of paragraph 5; the carrier should be liable if the claimant proved fault.
No one should be liable for content on the Internet of which they are not the author, unless they have either adopted that content as their own or refused to obey a court order to remove that content.
The United States supported the proposition that operators engaged in an activity should be liable for the harm that might result therefrom.
Her delegation believed that the carrier should be liable from the point at which the goods were received and should not be able to escape liability by redefining the period of responsibility.
It was logical that the country in the territory orunder the jurisdiction of which the activity causing the harm was carried out should be liable for the damage.
One of the controversial issues is whether the operator should be liable for damage that was identified and accepted in a comprehensive environmental assessment referred to as CEE in the discussions.
Such carriers should be obliged to ascertain that travelers are in possession of travel documents required for entering a certain State and should be liable in case they fail to do so 28.
Without prejudice to paragraph 1, any person should be liable for damage caused or contributed to by not complying with applicable statutory or regulatory requirements or through wrongful, intentional, reckless or negligent acts or omissions.
Thereafter, in the view of those countries, the State or States that own oroperate the payload should be liable for damage caused by it A/AC.105/763, annex II, para. 17.
Without prejudice to paragraph 1, any person should be liable for damage caused or contributed to by not complying with applicable statutory or regulatory requirements or through wrongful, intentional, reckless or negligent acts or omissions.
A legal person is a separate entity that has legal rights and duties separate from those of its founders,shareholders or employees and as such it should be liable for its“actions or inaction”.
Certain people should be liable for the violation of each green right, who have polluted or deprived people of their water, eradicated their land areas, haven't informed about risks for health and limited their opportunities for socio-economic development.
Nor is the party owing the agreed sum permitted, in cases where the amount recoverable as damages is less than the agreed sum,to assert that that party should be liable only for damages.
Instead, the Uniform Rules should provide a very general rule to the effect that identification service providers should be liable to persons who relied on the identification to the extent that such reliance was reasonable.
The second part(debts incurred in the exercise of the profession) does not seem to be fair,for if the woman exercises a profession in the labor market, she should be liable for the debts incurred in such a case.