Примеры использования Special rapporteur's conclusion на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Special Rapporteur's conclusions in 1995.
With regard to objections with"intermediate effect," some members had questioned the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that such objections did not give rise to problems of permissibility.
The Special Rapporteur's conclusions in that regard gave rise to some difficulties.
With regard to the relationship between State liability and civil liability,she agreed with the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that State responsibility was normally subsidiary to that of the operator.
She welcomed the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that article 26 bis, on the exhaustion of local remedies, should be retained.
With regard to the topic of protection of persons in the event of disasters,his delegation supported the Special Rapporteur's conclusion regarding the irrelevance of the new notion of"responsibility to protect" to the work on the topic.
The Special Rapporteur's conclusion that the possibility of modifying a treaty by subsequent practice was not generally recognized was in many respects justified.
Some other members supported the Special Rapporteur's conclusions concerning exceptions to immunity.
He agreed with the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that cases in which one State delegated to another the right to exercise diplomatic protection seldom arose in practice.
Her Government fully supported the Special Rapporteur's conclusions concerning a threshold of"significant harm.
Some members supported the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that, apart from the case in which an interpretative declaration was prohibited by a treaty, it was not possible to identify other criteria for the permissibility of an interpretative declaration.
On the"clean hands" doctrine,he agreed with the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that there was no reason to include such a provision in the draft articles.
Indonesia welcomed the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that companies, individuals and groups must also observe international law with regard to their activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and that parties that rendered assistance in the construction of settlements were also implicated in violating international law.
His delegation endorsed the Special Rapporteur's conclusions and the draft resolution proposed by him.
It endorsed the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that there were three elements enabling the system to be applied in a satisfactory manner to all treaties, whatever their object; and considered that there was no reason to favour a proliferation of the regimes applicable in the light of the object of the legal.
The Government also characterizes as unsubstantiated the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that the situation of ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia continues to deteriorate.
He welcomed the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that denial of admission, extradition and aliens for whom expulsion was governed by special rules(such as diplomats and members of the armed forces) lay outside the scope of the topic; in his view, the issue of the expulsion of aliens in situations of armed conflict should also be excluded.
With regard to the protection of persons in the event of disasters,she welcomed the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that the concept of the responsibility to protect did not apply to disaster response, as well as his decision to exclude armed conflicts from the definition of"disaster.
Many delegations endorsed the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that the Vienna system could be applied in a satisfactory and uniform manner to all treaties irrespective of their object and that there was no reason to favour a proliferation of regimes, depending on the object of legal instruments, i.e. normative or human rights treaties.
Some, however, shared the Special Rapporteur's conclusion without supporting the analysis on which it was based.
His delegation supported the Special Rapporteur's conclusion, in paragraph 79 of his second report(A/CN.4/631), that there was no evidence in customary international law that would confirm the existence of exceptions to the immunity of State officials.
Some representatives disagreed with the Special Rapporteur's conclusion in the tenth report that it would be simpler not to impose any form of strict liability on the State.
His delegation supported the Special Rapporteur's conclusion regarding the source of obligations in the provisional application of treaties, namely that such obligations derived primarily from agreements between subjects of international law.
On the topic of provisional application of treaties,her delegation agreed with the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that the Commission should not be seen as encouraging or discouraging recourse to that practice, but should simply provide greater clarity regarding the legal regime governing provisional application.
His delegation supported the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that it was always the exclusive responsibility of the State itself to rectify the defect in the expression of its consent.
Mr. Mirzaee-Yengejeh(Islamic Republic of Iran)said that his delegation largely supported the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that the draft articles should be confined to issues relating to the nationality of claims and the exhaustion of local remedies rule so that consideration of the topic could be finalized during the current quinquennium.
Some members shared the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that there should not be draft articles dealing specifically with the questions covered in his fourth report.
While his analysis of these issues gave rise to heated discussion by the Commission,most of its members shared the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that it would not be worthwhile for the Commission to set out draft rules specific to these issues, even in the interest of progressive development of international law, since the topic deals not with the nationality regime but with the expulsion of aliens.
While some members shared the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that objections to reservations were not subject to conditions for permissibility, the opinion was expressed that a partial objection to a permissible reservation might itself pose problems of permissibility if it introduced elements that could render the combination of the reservation and the objection impermissible.
Some members questioned the Special Rapporteur's conclusion that objections with"intermediate effect" could not pose problems of permissibility.