Примеры использования Specialized registry на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Attachments to movable property subject to a specialized registry.
Registration in a specialized registry or notation on a title certificate.
The bank has made that right effective against third parties by registering in the specialized registry.
Registration in specialized registry has higher priority than registration in general registry. .
These rules are designed to preserve the reliability and comprehensiveness of the specialized registry record, if any.
Люди также переводят
If those assets were excluded from the law and a specialized registry existed for the respective security rights, there was no need for coordination.
The Chairperson said that term used in the draft Guide was"assets subject to registration in a specialized registry.
Priority of a security orother right registered in a specialized registry or noted on a title certificate.
No rights in the asset may be claimed as against third parties if notice of those rights in not given in the specialized registry.
A security right that is subsequently registered in the specialized registry or noted on a title certificate.
This rule applies if a document or notice of a security right maynot be registered or is not registered in a specialized registry.
If such a document ornotice may be registered and is registered in a specialized registry, different rules apply see recommendation 77 and paras. 9-11 below.
It was agreed that paragraph 9 should be aligned with recommendation 78,which referred to security rights that were registered in a specialized registry.
Priority where third-party effectiveness is based on registration in a specialized registry or notation on a title certificate.
A secured creditor orbuyer that relies on the specialized registry system has priority over a secured creditor that achieves third-party effectiveness by some other method see A/CN.9/631, recommendation 93.
In States that adopt this approach,the position is essentially the same as when no specialized registry exists at all.
As with attachments to immovable property, registration in the specialized registry, or notation on the title certificate, is necessary to achieve maximum third-party protection.
In these States, the retention-of-title seller orfinancial lessor will be the party that is registered as owner in the specialized registry.
If such a document ornotice may be registered and is registered in a specialized registry, different rules apply see the Guide, recommendation 77, and paras. 181-183 below.
However, this type of risk management is no different from that necessary for any other type of encumbered asset for which a specialized registry does not exist.
Finally, it should be noted that the issue of coordination between a specialized registry anda general security rights registry would arise even if the specialized registry were an international or regional registry. .
Such a security right has priority over a security right that is subsequently registered in the specialized registry or noted on a title certificate.
It was stated that the recommendations concerning registration in a specialized registry of a security right in an intellectual property right should apply only to the registries in which security rights could be registered.
Future work would need to address the third-party effectiveness of security rights in intellectual property with respect to which there is no specialized registry e.g. trade secrets or copyrights in many States.
If the priority rules set out by other law governing the specialized registry itself afford priority to a later-registered acquisition security right, this priority would not be affected by the law recommended in the Guide.
It was also suggested that the priority rule should be made subject to registration of a security right in a specialized registry that qualified as a specialized registry under the Guide.
However, sometimes a specialized registry for particular assets can be just as operationally efficient while also serving important broader functions that cannot be replicated by a general security rights registry. .
Option C made a distinction between intellectual property that could be registered in a specialized registry and intellectual property that could not be so registered.
It was also generally agreed that all that needed to be stated to reflect the thrust of article 18 was that a security right in a movable asset that was subject to specialized registration under other law could also be made effective against third parties by registration in a specialized registry.
The term proposed by his delegation denoted an asset the ownership of which was registered in a specialized registry and with respect to which a security right might also be registered.