Примеры использования Struggle of peoples на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Terrorism needed to be distinguished from the struggle of peoples for self-determination, which was a sacred right.
Aa The struggle of peoples under colonial or alien domination and foreign occupation for self-determination does not constitute terrorism.
Therefore, we would have called for a reference in the resolution to the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for self-determination.
There was a danger that the struggle of peoples for self-determination might be confused with terrorism.
During the period of the Republic,when we were also discriminated against and marginalized, the struggle of peoples for life and humanity was never taken into account.
Люди также переводят
Reaffirms that the struggle of peoples under colonialist domination or under foreign occupation, for their national liberation or to regain their right to self-determination, does not constitute an act of terrorism.
Efforts must be madeto understand its root causes and a distinction must be made between international terrorism and the struggle of peoples to free themselves from foreign occupation.
His delegation remained of the view that the struggle of peoples against foreign occupation could not be assimilated to terrorism.
His delegation stressed that the comprehensive convention on international terrorism should make a clear distinction between terrorism and the struggle of peoples under foreign occupation.
A distinction should be made, however, between the struggle of peoples for self-determination and terrorism, which took innocent lives.
The reference to the Declaration on the Occasion of the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations, the United Nations Millennium Declaration andthe principles of the Charter tended to make a clear distinction between terrorism and the struggle of peoples against foreign occupation.
Her Government made tireless efforts to support the struggle of peoples under occupation and colonial rule so that they might exercise their right to self-determination.
Indeed, to ensure the universality and effectiveness of efforts to combat terrorism,it is thus vital that terrorism not be confused with the struggle of peoples against colonial domination or foreign occupation.
The Distinction Between International Terrorism and The Struggle of Peoples for Self Determination", Lecture at the international training seminar organized by the University of Kuwait 1990 in Arabic.
It seemed unlikely that convening an international conference to define terrorism and to differentiate it from the struggle of peoples for national liberation would produce practical results.
However, terrorism should not be confused with the struggle of peoples under colonial rule or foreign domination and it must be accurately defined so that the definition could not be abused for political ends.
Rooting out terror would require addressing its root causes, andterrorism needed to be distinguished from the struggle of peoples to achieve their independence in accordance with international law.
Syria supported the struggle of peoples under colonial rule and foreign occupation for their right to self-determination, as enshrined in the Charter, many General Assembly resolutions and the International Covenants on Human Rights.
Since its inception, the United Nations had played a commendable role in the struggle of peoples to realize their right to self-determination from foreign and colonial occupation.
To achieve practical results, flexibility would be required and solutions would need to be found to such problems as the definition of terrorism, the activities of armed forces,the distinction between terrorism and the struggle of peoples for self-determination and the concept of State terrorism.
That would end the conceptual confusion existing between terrorism and the struggle of peoples subjected to colonial and racist regimes and foreign occupation or other forms of colonial domination.
The struggle of peoples for their right to self-determination remained valid in the contemporary world situation, not only because there were still 17 territories still under colonial rule, but also because new threats had arisen that were no less perilous, especially to the peoples of developing countries.
Mr. Abebe(Ethiopia) said that the founding of Timor-Leste testified to the crucial United Nations role in the struggle of peoples for self-determination and in ending colonial rule.
Reiterates, in this connection, that the struggle of peoples plying under the yoke of foreign occupation and colonialism, to accede to national freedom and establish their right to self-determination, does not in any way constitute an act of terrorism.
It also wished to reiterate that a clear distinction must be drawn between terrorist acts and the struggle of peoples to resist foreign occupation, establish self-determination and maintain or restore sovereignty.
The Meeting reiterated that the struggle of peoples plying under the yoke of foreign occupation and colonialism, to exercise their right to self-determination and to accede to national freedom, does not in any way constitute an act of terrorism.
The delegations which she represented disagreed with paragraph 2,which reaffirmed the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples by all available means; the United Nations should, above all, encourage the search for peaceful solutions.
It also calls for the elaboration of internationally acceptable criteria to differentiate clearly between terrorism,which must be condemned and eliminated, and the struggle of peoples for national liberation, which must be protected and supported.
The problem of distinguishing between terrorism and the struggle of peoples for self-determination constituted a significant stumbling block, however, and success in drafting an agreed text would depend on compromise and respect by all positions.
The new wording implicitly reflected the attachment of all States to General Assembly resolution 46/51,which reaffirmed that the struggle of peoples against occupation and for their liberation was legitimate and recognized as such by international law and the Charter of the United Nations.