Примеры использования Sub-commission decided to request на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
By its decision 1990/119, the Sub-Commission decided to request Mr. Eduardo Suescún Monroy to prepare the method and plan of work for the study on human rights and extreme poverty.
In addition, having regard to the interdependence and indivisibility of civil and political rights and economic, social andcultural rights, the Sub-Commission decided to request the Special Rapporteurs to continue their study on the second aspect of the question, concerning economic, social and cultural rights.
In its decision 2004/112, the Sub-Commission decided to request the Special Rapporteur, Ms. Motoc, to submit an interim report to its fifty-seventh session and a final report to its fiftyeighth session.
The Sub-Commission decided to request Mr. Ioan Maxim to serve as the new Special Rapporteur on the question of human rights and states of emergency and to submit in the eleventh annual report an updated list of States which have proclaimed or extended a state of emergency, and a list, to be submitted every five years, of those States which have terminated a state of emergency, together with further recommendations on the protection of human rights during states of emergency.
In its decision 2002/116, the Sub-Commission decided to request Mr. RodríguezCuadros to prepare, without financial implications, an additional expanded working paper for submission to the SubCommission at its fiftyfifth session.
In decision 1991/117, the Sub-Commission decided to request of the Commission on Human Rights authorization to establish, on an exceptional basis in 1992, an inter-sessional working group on the reform of the methods of work of the Sub-Commission. .
In its decision 1998/106, the Sub-Commission decided to request Mr. Eide to complete the review and update of the report on the right to food and to submit the final version of the updated study to the Sub-Commission at its fifty-first session.
In its decision 2004/115, the Sub-Commission decided to request Mr. Gudmundur Alfredsson and Mr. Ibrahim Salama to prepare a working paper on the evaluation of the content and delivery of technical cooperation in the field of human rights, for the purpose of seeking possible improvements, and to submit it to the Sub-Commission at its fifty-seventh session.
In its decision 2003/106, the Sub-Commission decided to request Mr. RodríguezCuadros to prepare the final version of his working paper, taking into account the comments and suggestions made at the fifty-fifth session of the Sub-Commission, for submission to the SubCommission at its fifty-sixth session.
By its decision 1995/117, the Sub-Commission decided to request the working group to continue with priority, at the forty-eighth session, the consideration of the draft basic principles and guidelines proposed by the Special Rapporteur, Mr. Theo van Boven, with a view to making substantive progress in the matter.
In its decision 2004/115, the Sub-Commission decided to request Mr. Gudmundur Alfredsson and Mr. Ibrahim Salama to prepare a working paper on the evaluation of the content and delivery of technical cooperation in the field of human rights, for the purpose of seeking possible improvements, and to submit it to the Sub-Commission at its fifty-seventh session.
In its decision 2005/106, the Sub-Commission decided to request Ms. Françoise Hampson and Mr. Mohamed Habib Cherif to prepare an expanded working paper on the implementation in practice of the right to an effective remedy for human rights violations and to submit it to the working group on the administration of justice at the fiftyeighth session of the SubCommission.
In its decision 2002/113, the Sub-Commission decided to request Mr. Sik Yuen to submit, without financial implications, an expanded and updated working paper on this topic to be considered at its fifty-fifth session, in which due attention should be paid to the comments and proposals advanced during the debate at the fiftyfourth session on the working paper.
In its decision 2004/114, the Sub-Commission decided to request Mr. Gáspár Bíró and Ms. Antoanella-Iulia Motoc to prepare a working paper on human rights and non-State actors, in order to approach in a systematic way the question of accountability under international human rights law, and to submit it to the Sub-Commission at its fifty-seventh session.
In its decision 2005/109, the Sub-Commission decided to request Mr. Janio Iván Tuñón Veilles to prepare a working paper on transitional justice and investigation mechanisms for truth and reconciliation, with emphasis on the experiences in Latin America, and to submit it to the sessional working group on the administration of justice at the fiftyeighth session of the SubCommission.
In its decision 2003/116, the Sub-Commission decided to request Ms. Florizelle O'Connor to prepare and to submit to the Sub-Commission at its fifty-sixth session a working paper identifying and analyzing possible alternatives that would enable the Sub-Commission to respond fully and as effectively as possible to the Commission's request by the date fixed in resolution 2003/83.
In its decision 2004/119, the Sub-Commission decided to request Ms. Françoise Hampson to prepare a working paper on the implementation in domestic law of the right to an effective remedy in civil matters against violations of human rights by State agents and to submit it to the working group on the administration of justice at the fiftyseventh session of the SubCommission.
In its decision 1997/116, the Sub-Commission decided to request the sessional working group on the administration of justice to continue its consideration of the expanded working paper prepared by Mr. Chernichenko and for that purpose to transmit the working paper, through the Secretary-General, to the International Law Commission, so that the Commission's comments might be considered at the next session of the working group.
In its decision 2003/114, the Sub-Commission decided to request Ms. Hampson to update her expanded working paper and to submit a final working paper to the Sub-Commission at its fiftysixth session, taking into account the views expressed during the debate on this issue at the fifty-fifth session, with a view to transmitting it to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, the other treaty bodies and the International Law Commission.
The Special Rapporteur recommends that the Sub-Commission decide to request the Secretary-General to submit the attached principles and guidelines to indigenous peoples' organizations, Governments, specialized agencies and non-governmental organizations concerned for their comments.
It further decided to request the Sub-Commission to endorse this decision.
The Sub-Commission also decided to request the Secretary-General to submit a relevant note on this subject to it at its fifty-third session.
At its fifty-fourth session, the Commission on Human Rights, in its resolution 1998/32, decided to request the Sub-Commission to reconsider its recommendation to appoint a Special Rapporteur on the privatization of prisons.
At its fifty-fourth session, the Commission on Human Rights, in its decision 1998/104, decided to request the Sub-Commission to reconsider its recommendation to appoint a Special Rapporteur on human rights and scientific and technological developments.
It also decided to request the Sub-Commission and its superior bodies to authorize the Chairperson-Rapporteur to participate in the Forum's second session, to be held in New York in April/May 2003.
The Commission on Human Rights, at its fiftieth session, adopted decision 1994/103, in which it decided to request the Sub-Commission to reconsider its decisions containing recommendations concerning new studies and related efforts, including the above-mentioned report.
By its decision 1994/103(see paras. 763-767), the Commission decided to request the Sub-Commission to reconsider draft decisions 1, 2, 4, 8 and 13, which it had recommended for adoption by the Commission see E/CN.4/1994/2, chap. I, sect.
At its fifty-first session, the Sub-Commission, in its decision 1999/107, decided to request Mr. Guissé to supplement his working paper, without financial implications, and to submit it to the Sub-Commission at its fifty-second session.
At its fifty-fifth session, the Commission on Human Rights, in its decision 1999/108, noted that the issue of the right of individuals to drinking water supply andsanitation services remained undefined and therefore decided to request the Sub-Commission to give further consideration to that aspect in preparation for a study on the realization and promotion of that right.
At its forty-ninth session, the Sub-Commission, in its resolution 1997/25, decided to request Ms. Lucy Gwanmesia to prepare, without financial implications, a detailed working paper on juvenile justice to be submitted to the Sub-Commission at its fiftieth session.