Примеры использования Such remedy на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
One such remedy should be adequate assistance to the victims for their suffering.
As the Supreme Court judges are also appointed by the Chief Justice, such remedy cannot be considered effective.
Such remedy may be granted by statute or by a collective agreement as described below.
However, it is impossible to consider each such remedy as a panacea and a 100% guarantee of getting rid of all unpleasant symptoms.
Such remedy follows from the generally recognized principle of restitution ad integrum, requiring the immediate restoration of the physical liberty of the arbitrarily detained person.
With respect to the possibility of filing a complaint with the Ombudsman, counsel argues that such remedy is irrelevant, since the Ombudsman's decisions are not legally binding.
Although we are not hopeful that the Council, with its discriminatory attitude manifested in its silence toward the human tragedy which is currently occurring in Gaza by the Zionist regime,can do such remedy.
If the seized court does not grant such remedy under its own national law, it will not be bound to grant it under the Convention.
It considers, nevertheless,that the complainant has not presented enough substantial information to support the belief that such remedy would be unreasonably prolonged or unlikely to bring effective relief.
She would like to know what the last such remedy was and whether members of the judiciary received instruction in the Convention and the Optional Protocol.
She would also appreciate information regarding the outcome of a number of complaints in which victims had been granted a remedy through the Belgian courts, since such remedy, once offered, must be effective.
The Office of the Ombudsman could invoke such remedy on behalf of persons who had been wrongly detained; there was no need for a private defence counsel for the purpose.
On 29 May 2012, the State party, referring to Article 2(1) of Act 288/1996, informed the Committee that on 20 June 2007, the Council of Ministers decided not to grant compensation to the author,as the Committee did not recommend such remedy.
Where necessary, steps must to be taken to provide such remedy in concurrence with the representatives of the Palestinian people and the assistance of the international community.
Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by the Charter, have been infringed ordenied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.
It was noted, however, that such remedy was neither simple nor universally available and that constitutional problems were therefore likely to cause such States to reject the statute, or at least to express reservations on it.
Where a person sentenced to death seeks available constitutional review of irregularities in a criminal trial butdoes not have sufficient means to meet the costs of legal assistance in order to pursue such remedy, the State would be obliged to provide free legal aid.
The mission noted that, where necessary,steps should be taken to provide such remedy in concurrence with the representatives of the Palestinian people and the assistance of the international community.
Such remedy should include restitution of the property or compensation, and appropriate compensation for the period during which the author and his widow were deprived of the property, starting on the date of the court decision of 20 November 1995 and ending on the date when the restitution has been completed.
However, article 2, paragraph 3(b), obliges States parties to ensure determination of the right to such remedy by a competent judicial, administrative or legislative authority, a guarantee which would be void if it were not available where a violation had not yet been established.
Where the claimant State prefers not to bring a direct claim or where the injury to the national outweighs the injury to the State it seems that in most instances the local remedies rule will not apply because there will be no available oreffective remedy in the respondent State or any such remedy would be futile.
Furthermore, article 2, paragraph 3(b), obliges State parties to ensure determination of the right to such remedy"by a competent judicial, administrative or legislative authority", but a State Party cannot reasonably be required, on the basis of that article, to make such procedures available no matter how unmeritorious the claims may be.
The State party cannot base its actions on speculation about the possible content of a review undertaken pursuant to an appeal of which there is no evidence and which, had it been brought, would necessarily have been rejected as inadmissible. Norcan it do so on the basis of suppositions about the scope of the review in an appeal in cassation when the author himself admits that he has sought no such remedy.
Furthermore, article 2, paragraph 3(b), obliges States parties to ensure determination of the right to such remedy"by a competent judicial, administrative or legislative authority", but a State Party cannot reasonably be required, on the basis of that article, to make such procedures available no matter how unmeritorious the claims may be.
Section 6 of that Ordinance provides that a court or tribunal, whether in proceedings within its jurisdiction for a breach of the Ordinance or in other proceedings within its jurisdiction in which a violation or threatened violation of the Bill of Rights is relevant,may grant such remedy or relief, or make such order, in respect of such a breach, violation or threatened violation as it has power to grant or make in those proceedings and as it considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.
Within the period of 60 days after the effective date of the decision on the ultimate remedy available for protection of the relevant right, and failing such remedy within the period of 60 days after the day on which the act was committed, a natural or legal person may lodge a constitutional complaint pursuant to section 74 of Law No. 182/1993 Coll. on the Constitutional Court, as amended.
Please comment on whether, in practice, such remedies exist.
He argued that such remedies would be unreasonably prolonged.
Such remedies may be rather expensive, especially remedies from ground pearls or amber.
Such remedies had not been exhausted in this case.