Примеры использования Their nuclear weapons на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Indeed, a number of States had dismantled their nuclear weapons.
Maintaining their nuclear weapons in the trigger-alert situation.
These States are not ready to abandon their nuclear weapons.
Maintaining their nuclear weapons in the trigger-alert situation.
In South Asia, India andPakistan must relinquish their nuclear weapons and must join the NPT.
Maintaining their nuclear weapons in the trigger-alert situation.
There is a responsibility, too,on nuclear-weapon States to reduce their nuclear weapons.
To further reduce their nuclear weapons with transparency.
It will severely constrain the ability of the nuclear Powers to further improve their nuclear weapons.
Maintaining their nuclear weapons in a trigger-alert situation.
There is a perception that the nuclear Powers intend to retain their nuclear weapons for the foreseeable future.
The former should work in good faith to eliminate their nuclear weapons; the latter should pursue their inalienable right to the peaceful use of nuclear energy in compliance with established procedures.
China actively seeks to ensure that nuclear-weapon States do not aim their nuclear weapons at each other.
Honouring their commitment not to target their nuclear weapons against any countries, nor to list any countries as targets of nuclear strikes;
Second, the United States andthe Russian Federation have taken further steps to reduce the number of their nuclear weapons.
They have argued boldly that they will keep their nuclear weapons in operational readiness against unknown threats.
Such a protocol should contain a categorical commitment by the nuclear-weapon States not to improve their nuclear weapons.
The CTBT will not prevent the nuclear Powers from maintaining their nuclear weapons in operational readiness through non-explosive tests.
Perhaps someday in the future, there will be a magical moment when the countries of the world will get together to eliminate their nuclear weapons.
For Ukraine, it goes without saying that States must not use their nuclear weapons or threaten to use them against non-nuclear-weapon States.
In 2009, the Heads of State of China andthe United States reaffirmed their commitment not to target their nuclear weapons at each other.
The commitment given by the nuclear-weapon States to give up their nuclear weapons, reaffirmed unequivocally at the NPT Review Conference in 2000, must be honoured.
As an interim measure, for instance,nuclear-weapon States should de-alert and de-activate their nuclear weapons immediately.
Some nuclear-weapon States persist in keeping their nuclear weapons and insist that it is only to preserve their own integrity and security and those of their allies.
Nuclear-weapon states should honor their commitment to not targeting their nuclear weapons against any other countries.
But, by not banning tests under laboratory conditions,it allows the nuclear Powers to continue developing and improving their nuclear weapons.
Welcoming the decisions of those non-nuclear-weapon States that have dismantled their nuclear weapons programs or renounced the possession of nuclear weapons. .
However, the indefinite extension of the NPT has by no means given nuclear-weapon States the prerogative to retain their nuclear weapons permanently.
We call upon the nuclear-weapon States to make further concrete efforts to reduce their nuclear weapons with a view to achieving the ultimate goal of eliminating these arsenals.
This was because some of the nuclear-weapon States have sought to create new andquestionable justifications to retain their nuclear weapons indefinitely.