Примеры использования To protect vulnerable marine на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Management approaches and tools to protect vulnerable marine and coastal ecosystems.
The United States had taken avariety of domestic actions, principally through its regional fisheries management councils, to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems.
Many delegations underscored the need to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems and called for all stakeholders to raise awareness of such vulnerability.
A number of delegations stressed the importance of measures to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems.
The need to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems in areas beyond national jurisdiction was underlined by a number of delegations and especially nongovernmental organizations.
New Zealand and the United States have taken, and Portugal is in the process of taking,measures to further conserve deep sea species and to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems.
Several delegations proposed the need to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems in areas beyond national jurisdiction as a whole, rather than the protection of individual components of these ecosystems.
General Assembly resolution 61/105 required States andregional fisheries management organizations to take measures to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems from bottom fishing.
We are of the view that more could be done to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems from the damage that can occur as a result of bottom fishing than the protective regulations laid out in resolution 61/105.
Many delegations reiterated their support for the application of an ecosystem-based approach as a management tool to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems and their biological components.
Last year, our nations banded together to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems from deep-sea bottom trawling, a destructive fishing practice responsible for 95 per cent of worldwide damage to seamounts.
Palau urged all responsible nations to echo its call for a prohibition on bottom trawling in areas where effective conservation andmanagement measures were not yet in place to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems.
The United States has adopted measures within areas under its national jurisdiction to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems and biodiversity and to manage deep-sea fisheries.
In that resolution we called on the regional fisheries management organizations(RFMOs) and arrangements with competence to regulate bottom fisheries to adopt andimplement certain measures to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems.
The benefits of sharing best practices were highlighted, for example,in the implementation of measures to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems from significant adverse impacts pursuant to General Assembly resolution 61/105.
In this connection, they emphasized the importance of capacity-building for developing countries, including financial and technical assistance and the transfer of marine technology on fair and reasonable terms andconditions, in order to further their domestic efforts to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems.
NEAFC closed eight areas in its regulatory area to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems. However, information and data on vulnerable habitats and deep sea fisheries have not been satisfactory.
They indicated also that some of the organizations covered species andgeographic areas that would allow them to adopt measures to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems, both inside and outside areas of national jurisdiction.
Other delegations reported on the respective efforts of their Governments to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems in areas under national jurisdiction, including elaboration of laws and regulations and adoption of management policies tailored towards the protection of these ecosystems.
The discussions at the workshop and the moderator's summary report contributed significantly to our understanding of the status of implementation of the provisions to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems from destructive fishing practices.
The time-bound measures proposed in General Assembly resolution 61/105 of 2006 to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems from destructive bottom fishing practices represent an important first step in addressing the problem.
The United States has been pleased with the significant strides made by many States andRFMOs in responding to the calls of the General Assembly to take action to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems and regulate bottom fisheries.
The Russian Federation continues to take an active part in developing andimplementing measures to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems, both at the individual level and within the framework of relevant regional fisheries management organizations.
The interim measures agreed as a result of both negotiations are based on the blueprint for international action established inGeneral Assembly resolution 61/105, paragraphs 80 to 91, to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems from the impacts of bottom fishing.
Accordingly, we see the time-bound measures proposed in this year's draft resolution to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems, including seamounts, hydrothermal vents and cold-water corals from destructive bottom-fishing practices as a first important step in addressing this problem.
Request regional fisheries management organizations and arrangements with existing competency to implement spatial andtemporal measures to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems to do so as a matter of urgency;
States wishing to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems should become parties to the relevant conventions and should apply them and the relevant action plans and programmes to vulnerable ecosystems within their jurisdiction and to their nationals and ships flying their flag in areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction.
A group of delegations expressed the opinion that a broadrange of rules and measures already existed to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems and that greater efforts were needed to ensure the effective application of all existing instruments.
In the interim, as a precautionary measure, it urges States to prohibit their vessels from engaging in destructive fishing practices in high seas areas whereno competent RFMO or arrangement exists, so as to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems from the impacts of fishing.
IPHC provides data to its members on research and commercial fishing effort distribution, and identifies habitat andestablishes closed areas to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems, in particular deep-water corals and sponges, in its regulatory areas in the north-east Pacific Ocean.