Примеры использования To reclassify posts на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In that context, the Committee noted that there were likely to be instances in which the Court would wish to reclassify posts.
New arrangements to reclassify posts had been implemented with a view to ensuring that the civil service responded to changing circumstances.
The Nigerian delegation had taken note of the proposal to expand the powers of the Secretary-General to reclassify posts.
The utilization of the existing authority of the Secretary-General to reclassify posts was addressed in paragraphs 17 to 22 of document A/60/572/Add.3.
When there is no net change in the distribution of posts in the programme budget as approved by the General Assembly,the Secretary-General would have the flexibility to reclassify posts up to the P-5 level;
The Committee's experience with regard to a number of requests to reclassify posts leads it to restate its position regarding the grading of posts. .
When there is no net change in the distribution of posts in the programme budget as approvedby the General Assembly, the Secretary-General would have the flexibility to reclassify posts up to the P-5 level;
Granting to the Secretary-General the authority to reclassify posts up to the P-5 level, while ensuring that the relationship between the overall numbers for each grade level is maintained;
The view was also expressed that while there was a need for surge capacities,there was no need to reclassify posts at higher levels.
The Advisory Committee therefore recommended against the proposals to reclassify posts at a higher level or to establish new posts at a grade level higher than that of the posts to be abolished.
In view of its position on the ratio of support staff to Professional staff, the Committee has,in a number of cases, recommended in favour of requests to reclassify posts from the General Service to the Professional category.
The cost-neutral, or potentially even cost-saving, proposal to reclassify posts to senior revisers at the P-5 level, one in each of the Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish sections, was supported by the General Assembly.
In this connection, the Committee recalls that, in its first report on the proposed programme budget for the biennium 2004-2005, it recommended that the staffing table should be managed as a whole andthat existing authority for the Secretary-General to reclassify posts be refined so as to provide the abilityto reclassify posts from G-1 to G-6 and from P-1 to P-5, provided that the overall number of posts in each grade does not change.
The decision of the General Assembly to grant the Secretary-General the authority to reclassify posts up to the P-5 level, subject to certain conditions, would provide a measure of flexibility in the management of the staffing table, enabling the Secretary-General to respond in a more timely manner to his responsibilities for implementing the wide range of activities requested by the Member States.
In paragraph 74 of its first report on the proposed programme budget for the biennium 2004-2005(A/58/7), the Advisory Committee recommended that the existing authority for the Secretary-General to reclassify posts be refined so as to provide the ability to reclassify posts from G-1 to G-6 and from P-1 to P-5, provided that the overall number of posts in each grade did not change.
Authorizes the Court, in implementing the approved programme budget for 2004, to reclassify posts within the Professional grades and within the General Service grades provided that, for each programme, the overall number of posts in each grade, as set out in paragraph 2 above, remains the same, and provided further that any such reclassifications comply with the relevant internal procedures developed in pursuance of the Staff Regulations of the Court;
The Committee is aware that procedures to effect transfer of staff between units of the Secretariat, to reclassify posts and to manage vacancies are excessively cumbersome, time consuming and very costly.
In the light of its previous comments on granting to the Secretary-General the authority and flexibility to reclassify posts up to the P-5 level, included in paragraph 8 of its twelfth report(A/48/7/Add.11), endorsed by the General Assembly in its resolution 48/228 C of 29 July 1994, and reiterated in paragraphs 98 to 104 of the Committee's report(A/50/7), the Committee will not object to the proposed reclassifications.
In this connection, for example, the Committee recalls its recommendation in paragraph 74 of its first report on the proposed programme budget for the biennium 2004-2005(A/58/7) that the existing authority for the Secretary-General to reclassify posts be refined so as to provide the ability to reclassify posts from G-1 to G-6 and from P-1 to P-5, provided that the overall number of posts in each grade does not change.
The Advisory Committee recommends that the existing authority for the Secretary-General to reclassify posts be refined so as to provide the ability to reclassify posts from G-1 to G-6 and from P-1 to P-5, provided that the overall number of posts in each grade do not change.
In paragraph 74 of that report, the Committee recommended that the existing authority for the Secretary-General to reclassify posts be refined so as to provide the ability to reclassify posts from G-1 to G-6 and from P-1 to P-5, provided that the overall number of posts in each grade did not change.
It is further proposed to abolish one international post(P-4) and to reclassify three posts(P-5) to a lower grade level 2 P-3 and 1 P-4.
The additional $5 million received for the biennium 2012-2013 has been used to establish 13 additional posts and to reclassify 5 posts.
Decides to reclassify the posts of Associate Public Information Officer, Chief Security Officer and Chief of Integrated Support Services to the P3, P4 and P5 levels, respectively;
In the Civil Affairs Section, following the completion of the national electoral process, it is proposed to reclassify 2 posts of head of regional offices from P-5 to P-3.
In that connection, the Committee took note of the proposal to maintain the post of Assistant Secretary-General and to reclassify certain posts.
The Committee recommends approval of the proposal to reclassify six posts from the Local level to the National Officer level.
As review and adjustment of the organizational structure would be required,it was decided to reclassify the posts to the P-5 and P-4 levels on a provisional basis to permit recruitment action pending completion of the organizational review.
In the Engineering Services Section, it is proposed to reclassify 2 posts for Sector Engineers from the P-4 level to the P-3 level.
For 1999, it is proposed to establish three new P-2 posts and nine additional General Service posts, as well as to reclassify two posts(1 P-3 to P-4 and 1 P-2 to the P-3 level) A/C.5/53/13, annex III, paras. 94-96.