Примеры использования Transboundary damage на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Transboundary damage from hazardous activities.
Civil liability for transboundary damage;
It had expressed its support for the establishment of a credible regime including adequate compensation for victims of transboundary damage.
Horbach, Centre for Transboundary Damage and Compensation Netherlands.
The Convention is not limited to transboundary damage.
Люди также переводят
On civil liability for transboundary damage caused by hazardous activities.
Operator" means any person in command orcontrol of the activity at the time the incident causing transboundary damage occurs.
The third element concerned the notion that transboundary damage included damage to the environment.
Mr. Yin Yubiao(China), referring to chapter IV of the report,said that prevention was an important aspect of the issues relating to transboundary damage.
Draft legally binding instrument on civil liability for transboundary damage caused by hazardous activities.
Within such a scheme, suggestions were made for the inclusion of a rebuttable presumption of causal connection between the hazardous activity and the transboundary damage.
Preparation of a legally binding instrument on civil liability for transboundary damage caused by hazardous activities.
The State could then assume a subsidiary responsibility to compensate andshould create systems for resolving the problems associated with transboundary damage.
The present draft principles apply to transboundary damage caused by hazardous activities not prohibited by international law.
State practice with regard to hazardous activities showed that the concept of liability for transboundary damage was becoming increasingly established.
Once the transboundary damage occurs, transboundary victims should be provided equal access to administrative or quasi-judicial and/or judicial bodies charged with jurisdiction to deal with claims for compensation.
In such cases, it was obviously unfair to allocate residual liability for transboundary damage to the developing State alone.
The statement of the objective of the draft principles was overly condensed, jumbling together natural and legal persons and States as possible victims andmixing damage to the environment with other kinds of transboundary damage.
Draft legally binding instrument on civil liability for transboundary damage caused by hazardous activities, within the scope of both conventions.
His delegation endorsed the concept that the draft articles should apply only to activities which involved the risk of causing significant transboundary damage.
It would be a contradiction,after having posed the general obligation to prevent transboundary damage and attenuate the risks, not to provide for the consequences arising from any actual damage. .
It lumped together as possible victims natural and legal persons, including States, andcoupled damage to the environment with other kinds of transboundary damage.
It was important to clarify andestablish the consequences under international law in cases where substantial transboundary damage was caused, even when the State of origin had complied with all the rules of prevention.
Further, it was suggested that such a global distinction was not necessary andhelpful for progressive development of the law of liability and compensation for transboundary damage.
It restated the importance of an enhanced international regime to cover possible transboundary damage arising from peaceful nuclear activity.
These States should take such response measures as are within their power in areas under their jurisdiction orcontrol to help prevent or mitigate such transboundary damage.
His delegation supported the Commission's approach in treating the prevention of transboundary damage from hazardous activities, as a separate issue, which would greatly facilitate the conduct of its work.
On the Working Group's recommendation,the Commission had decided to undertake first prevention under the subtitle“Prevention of transboundary damage from hazardous activities”.
When considering evidence of the causal link between the hazardous activity and the transboundary damage,[due] account shall be taken of the risk of causing significant damage inherent in the hazardous activity.
There is also a duty for the State of origin to consult the States likely to be affected to determine the best possible response action to prevent or mitigate a transboundary damage.