Примеры использования Two legal regimes на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Autonomous law to take the place of these two legal regimes;
The fundamental difference between the two legal regimes is based on the principles of each regime. .
However, in that respect there was a potential for conflict between the two legal regimes.
The two legal regimes differ with respect to their rules, but first and foremost with respect to their guiding principles.
The drawback, however, is that the amendment will result in two legal regimes.
The idea of creating law overarching the two legal regimes COTIF/CIM and SMGS might certainly appear to be very attractive.
Yet, it is in this regard that the Netherlands discerns a possible tension between the two legal regimes.
In that respect, the conceptual distinction between the two legal regimes and the differing nature and purpose of each must be borne in mind.
Such an agreement if subject to ratification, acceptance, approval oraccession would also result in two legal regimes.
In the case of a conflict between the provisions of the two legal regimes with regard to a specific situation, the lex specialis will have to be identified and applied.
Part II of the present paper first clarifies the terminology before examining the history and nature of the two legal regimes.
In particular, there was a potential for conflict between the two legal regimes because each defined the term"equitable and reasonable utilization" differently.
This is also the case when the parties are planning interrupted CIM/SMGS transport operations with reconsignment at the border between the two legal regimes.
Nevertheless, important differences between the two legal regimes continue to exist.
This is also the case when the parties are planning interrupted CIM/SMGS transport operations with reconsignment at the border between the two legal regimes.
It is clear that, whilst the two legal regimes may take significantly different forms, they address a similar range of concerns and are complementary.
To prevent disputes between States from arising, matters relating to State sovereignty and the line of demarcation between the two legal regimes must be resolved.
The main distinction between those two legal regimes is that in air law the principle of State sovereignty prevails while in space law it does not.
Whether or not there is a practical, as opposed to an academic,issue concerning the relationship between the two legal regimes depends on the answers to be given to two questions.
Part II, by Ms. Hampson, examines whether the two legal regimes can be simultaneously applicable, in the light of the jurisprudence of human rights treaty bodies and special procedures.
However, in OTIF's view, this approach would constrain States not only to enter into a very lengthy cycle of negotiations, whose success would not be certain, butalso to denounce the two legal regimes that have proved their worth, COTIF/CIM and SMGS.
It is therefore necessary to consider the applicability of the two legal regimes in order to determine whether there are circumstances in which both bodies of rules are applicable.
The third solution, which is the preferred approach of OTIF, would be to put in place a legal system that would rapidly become operational by developing interface law between the two legal regimes which currently coexist, COTIF/CIM and SMGS.
In addition, it was stated that the risk of a conflict between the two legal regimes was mostly theoretical, in particular after the decision of the Working Group to turn draft articles 23 and 24 into conflict-of-laws rules.
In general, amendments to treaties do not establish separate institutional arrangements, even where the amendment may enter into force without the acceptance of all treaty parties and where, consequently,the amendment may result in two legal regimes- the amended treaty and the unamended treaty.
The new Code affords the husband and wife with an opportunity to select between two legal regimes-- of community property or of separate property, and a contractual regime.
The difference between these two legal regimes derives from their foundation, namely, that the foundation of the regime governing airspace is the sovereignty of individual States over their airspace, as established by article 1 of the Chicago Convention, which states as follows.
As the International Court of Justice has pointed out,in the case of a conflict between the provisions of the two legal regimes with regard to a specific situation, the lex specialis will have to be identified and applied.
The dual application of the provisions of these two legal regimes to such aquifers would not in principle cause any problem, as these legal regimes would not be expected to be in conflict with each other.
Irrespective of whether compensation is asked for in a civil or in a criminal procedure(if a hazardous act constitutes an offence, then the question of compensation for the damage suffered may be posed within the criminal procedure),the Act on Obligation Relations specifies two legal regimes for compensating the above-mentioned two kinds of damage.