Примеры использования Unilateral modifications на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 31/49,the parties should refrain from taking decisions which would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation.
That resolution calls upon the parties to refrain from introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the islands are going through the process of decolonization.
In that connection, the speak reiterated his appeal to the United Kingdom to comply with the provisions of General Assembly resolution 31/49 and refrain from unilateral modifications of the situation.
The parties should refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the Islands were going through the process recommended by the General Assembly.
Such unilateral measures were contrary to General Assembly resolution 31/49,which called upon the two parties to refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation.
They violate General Assembly resolution 31/49, which urges the parties to refrain from introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the Islands are going through the process of decolonization.
Unfortunately, in spite of those positive initiatives, the Government of the United Kingdom had taken unilateral action incompatible with the provisions of General Assembly resolution 31/49 of 1 December 1976 which had called on the parties to refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation.
His delegation reiterated the importance of compliance withGeneral Assembly resolution 31/49, which called upon the two parties to refrain from introducing unilateral modifications in the situation, and reaffirmed its support for the good offices of the Secretary-General.
Calls upon the two parties to refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the islands are going through the process recommended in[General Assembly resolutions 2065(XX) and 3160(XXVIII)]." resolution 31/49, para. 4.
Furthermore, the General Assembly, in resolution 31/49,had called upon Argentina and the United Kingdom to refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation during such negotiations.
Pursuant to General Assembly resolution 31/49,the parties should refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the islands were going through the process of seeking a solution, and in particular they should refrain from prospecting for or exploiting the hydrocarbon resources of the continental shelf.
Furthermore, the General Assembly, in resolution 31/49, had called upon Argentina andthe United Kingdom to refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation during such negotiations.
However, since 1989 the United Kingdom, contrary to General Assembly resolution 31/49,which called on the parties to refrain from introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the negotiations were ongoing, has moved forward with the implementation of unilateral activities in the disputed territories and waters affecting, inter alia, the renewable and non-renewable natural resources found there.
Furthermore, the General Assembly, in resolution 31/49,had called upon Argentina and the United Kingdom to refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation during such negotiations.
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 31/49 calls on the two parties to refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the islands are going through the process of negotiation recommended by the General Assembly;
In this connection, the Government of the Argentine Republic wishes to reiterate its rejection of this White Paper insofar as it refers to the Malvinas, South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands and rejects the designation of these colonial Territories subject to a sovereignty dispute as British Overseas Territories andany other similar designation, as well as any plan to introduce unilateral modifications in the situation while the sovereignty dispute is pending.
This resolution urges the two parties to the dispute to refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the islands are going through the process recommended in the above-mentioned resolutions 2065(XX) and 3160 XXVIII.
The Government of Argentina regarded as inadmissible the unilateral actions of the United Kingdom in the disputed areas, which were in violation of the provisions of the 1 December 1976 General Assembly resolution 31/49,which called upon the parties to refrain from introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the islands were going through the process of decolonization.
It should also comply with General Assembly resolution 31/49,which called upon the parties to refrain from taking decisions which would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the dispute was ongoing, including unilateral military action and the exploration and exploitation of renewable and nonrenewable natural resources in the disputed area.
In their declaration of 4 May 2010, the Heads of State and Government of the Union of South American Nations had rejected the United Kingdom's activities to explore non-renewable natural resources on the Argentine continental shelf, in direct opposition to the provisions of General Assembly resolution 31/49,which had called upon the two parties to refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the islands were going through the process recommended by the General Assembly.
The General Assembly, in resolution 31/49, had called upon Argentina andthe United Kingdom to refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the Islands were going through the negotiating process recommended by the General Assembly.
Until such negotiations were resumed,the provisions of General Assembly resolution 31/49 urging the parties to refrain from introducing unilateral modifications in the current situation of the islands were applicable.
Until such negotiations were resumed,the provisions of General Assembly resolution 31/49 urging the parties to refrain from introducing unilateral modifications in the current situation of the islands were applicable.
In addition, General Assembly resolutions 2065(XX) and31/49 stated that the two parties should refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the islands were the subject of bilateral negotiations.
In particular, this attitude is incompatible withGeneral Assembly resolution 31/49, which calls upon the two parties to refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the islands are going through the process recommended in the resolutions of the United Nations.
In this regard, the Heads of State and Government of Latin America andthe Caribbean recalled General Assembly resolution 31/49 which"calls upon the two parties to refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the islands are going through the process recommended" by the General Assembly.
The Argentine Government rejected all the false allegations and distortions of history contained in the so-called whitepaper relating to the Malvinas Islands, South Georgia Islands and South Sandwich Islands, as well as any British attempt to introduce unilateral modifications in the situation in those archipelagos and the surrounding maritime areas while the sovereignty dispute was unresolved.
They rejected, however, the exploration of nonrenewable natural resources being carried out by the United Kingdom on the Argentine continental shelf, in violation of General Assembly resolution 31/49,which called upon the two parties to refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the islands were going through the process recommended by the General Assembly.
Reaffirm General Assembly resolution 31/49, which requires both parties in the sovereignty dispute over the Malvinas Islands, South Georgia Islands and South Sandwich Islands and the maritime surrounding areas,to refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the islands are going through the process recommended by the General Assembly resolutions.
MERCOSUR and its associated States rejected the prospecting for non-renewable natural resources being carried out by the United Kingdom on the Argentine continental shelf, in violation of General Assembly resolution 31/49,which called upon the two parties to refrain from taking decisions that would imply introducing unilateral modifications in the situation while the Islands were going through the process recommended by the General Assembly.