Примеры использования View has been expressed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The view has been expressed that the right to return may constitute a generally recognized principle of international law.
This question is infrequently addressed in the legal literature, and the view has been expressed that"immunity should only be denied in relation to offences recognized as crimes of international law.
The view has been expressed in some quarters that the Mission should be further expanded to 400 international members.
While those measures represent important progress to tackle risks associated with large financial institutions, the view has been expressed that those risks are not yet adequately addressed in the present framework.
In particular, the view has been expressed on several occasions that Control authorities could benefit from gaining access to the ITDB.
A view has been expressed that during the technical assessment inadvertent errors in the information submitted could be corrected.
In the debates in the Commission and in the Sixth Committee, the view has been expressed that a lower threshold than"significant" harm is required for groundwaters, which are more fragile and, once polluted, take longer to purify than surface waters.
The view has been expressed that States retain a wide margin of discretion with respect to the procedural guarantees in expulsion proceedings.
Against this background, at the last session of the UNECE Working Party(Geneva,30 March 2006), the view has been expressed that the first draft of a non-mandatory European alternative for the regulation of multimodal transport as presented under in the ISIC study(Task B"Intermodal Liability and Documentation") seemed to be a step in the right direction Informal document No.1 2006.
The view has been expressed that the assumption of any commercially oriented function is inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.
However, in the literature and in case law, the view has been expressed that article 12 of the Rome Convention addresses issues of priority, either in paragraph 1(the law chosen by the parties) or in paragraph 2 the law governing the receivable.
The view has been expressed that the right of a State to expel an alien does not necessarily include the right to determine the destination of the alien.
As regards education or training programmes, the view has been expressed that a statement of fundamental standards of humanity would be an extremely useful document for explaining the basic principles of protecting human rights in situations of internal violence.
The view has been expressed that the expulsion of an alien is a measure undertaken to protect the interests of the territorial State rather than to punish the alien.
In contrast, the view has been expressed that the State is not under any obligation to accept the choice of destination of an alien who is subject to expulsion.
The view has been expressed that the application of ordre public by a State as a ground for expulsion must be measured against human rights standards.
In contrast, the view has been expressed that the standard must be somewhat vague in order to apply to various administrative and governmental organizations.
The view has been expressed that it may be difficult to distinguish between the individual expulsion of a large number of aliens and the collective expulsion of a group of aliens as such.
The view has been expressed that the current system of reservations is entirely inadequate to treaties whose ultimate beneficiaries are human beings, not Contracting Parties.
The view has been expressed by the Committee and supported by the General Assembly, that technical and substantive support for the Committee should be strengthened within existing resources.
The view has been expressed, and not only by small delegations, that written records are useful even if, as in the case of summary records, it is not possible to issue them in timely fashion.
Conversely, the view has been expressed that such conduct by the expelling States is inconsistent with the general rule that a State has no duty to admit aliens into its territory.
The view has been expressed that the deprivation of the nationality of a person by a State in order to avoid its obligations under international law may be unlawful in certain circumstances.
The view has been expressed that the deprivation of nationality for the purpose of the expulsion of a person would be contrary to the prohibition of the arbitrary deprivation of nationality contained in the Universal Declaration.
The view has been expressed that a correlative adjustment under paragraph 2 could be very costly to a developing country which may consider not including paragraph 2 in its treaties.
The view has been expressed widely that a lower threshold than"significant" harm is required for aquifers that are more fragile and, once polluted, take longer to clean than surface rivers.
A view has been expressed that, if national reporting formats are not revised immediately, then the existing national reporting formats may get entrenched and would be difficult to change at a later date.
Although the view has been expressed that an organization's personality exists with regard to non-member States only if they have recognized it, this assumption cannot be regarded as a logical necessity.
In addition, the view has been expressed that a small number of countries are dominating international statistical forums; whether or not that view is justified, it must be accepted that it exists.
More specifically, the view has been expressed that human rights provide relatively weak guarantees for aliens who are subject to expulsion because the rights of aliens in such circumstances are subject to many exceptions.