Примеры использования Violated his rights на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
You violated his rights.
Like it or not,Rafferty violated his rights.
And violated his rights as an individual.
The author claims that the State party violated his rights under article 14 of the Covenant.
He did not bring this matter to the attention of the authorities,as he was not aware that the beatings violated his rights.
Люди также переводят
The author maintained that this violated his rights under article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.
It followed that the automatic imposition of the death penalty in the author's case violated his rights under article 6, paragraph 1.
The author submits that the above violated his rights under article 14, paragraphs 3(b) and 5, of the Covenant.
Claim by ESCWA staff member that the decision to select a staff member other than the Applicant for a D-2 post violated his rights.
He reiterates that the above violated his rights under article 7 of the Covenant.
Claim by former UNICEF staff member that the decision to terminate his permanent appointment due to abolition of post violated his rights.
In addition, he maintains that the State party violated his rights under articles 14 and 15 of the Convention.
Claim by former UNRWA staff member that the abrogation of his entitlement to priority consideration for re-employment as a teacher violated his rights.
The author maintains that the above treatment violated his rights under articles 7, 9, 10 and 14 of the Covenant.
Claim by former UNRWA staff member that his separation on grounds of redundancy,when his post was reclassified at a higher grade, violated his rights.
It is also claimed that the application of the PTA itself violated his rights under articles 14, and 2, paragraph 1.
The author claims that the State party violated his rights under articles 7 and 10 of the Covenant, and that it failed to take any steps to punish those responsible for causing bodily injury to him.
The Committee notes the author's allegations that that the authorities violated his rights under article 19 of the Covenant.
He submits that the above violated his rights under article 9, paragraph 2, and article 14, paragraph 3(a), of the Covenant.
The Committee takes note of the author's submissions that the State party violated his rights under article 5 of the Covenant.
He asserts that this situation violated his rights under the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.
The author reiterates that his detention under that Decree violated his rights under article 9 of the Covenant.
The Committee notes that each of the author's claims is disputed by the State party,which has provided substantial information to explain every incident alleged to have violated his rights.
Accordingly, the Committee considers that the author's detention violated his rights under article 9, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.
Thus, the Committee concludes that the application to the author of the citizenship requirement laid down in Act No. 229/1991 violated his rights under article 26 of the Covenant.
The complainant also submits that the State party violated his rights under articles 12 and 13 of the Convention, by failing to investigate his torture claims.
The case of Ahmed v The United Kingdom concerns the applicant's complaint to the ECtHR that the UK violated his rights under articles 5 and 34 of the ECHR.
The author had also argued that his extradition violated his rights under article 7 as he would be facing 845 years in prison as a consequence of his sentence, which would amount to inhuman and degrading treatment.
It argues that the author has failed to substantiate his claim that the disclosure violated his rights under article 17 of the Covenant.
In addition, he submits that the unlawful interruption of the peaceful assembly violated his rights to publicly express his opinion, whereas article 35 of the Constitution provides for the right of peaceful assembly.