Примеры использования Weaker states на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It could encourage aggression against weaker States.
Kenya welcomes initiatives that protect the weaker States from the adverse effects of globalization.
In fact, it may create an unjustified disadvantage to weaker States.
They reiterated that real protection of small and weaker States should be firmly rooted in the rule of law.
A grave arms imbalance can encourage aggression against weaker States.
Classical Athens, for example, forced weaker states into the Delian League and in some cases imposed democratic government on them.
Strengthening the rule of law is critical to preserving the security of smaller and weaker States.
Doing so could place weaker States at an unfair disadvantage, and it complicated the task of distinguishing between the two terms.
First, of key importance is the preservation of the security of smaller and weaker States and the strengthening of the rule of law.
We also fully expect that powerful States will refrain from exerting their sovereign wills over smaller or weaker States.
Similarly, the impact of countermeasures against weaker States will generally be far more detrimental than for more powerful States. .
We reject the unilateral and unequal regimes which are designed to impose an unequal security order on the smaller and weaker States.
In its present configuration, the Council has shown that it is not in a position to protect the weaker States, who find themselves at loggerheads with a marauding super-Power.
Third-party dispute settlement procedures were considered a sine qua non in modern international law andan indispensable protection for small and weaker States.
While it had obviouslybenefited the strongest economies, it had tended to marginalize weaker States and had thus hindered their pursuit of development.
Mearsheimer makes a strong assertion on this matter:"Abstract rights such as self-determination are largely meaningless when powerful states get into brawls with weaker states.
When Walt refers to a threat,he is thinking of a scenario in which weaker states form an alliance to counter an attempt by a revisionist state to upset the balance of power.
Third-party dispute settlement procedures in the field of State responsibility were a sine qua non of international law andwere indispensable for the protection of militarily weaker States.
Human rights should never be used by powerful States to bludgeon and bully weaker States for spurious political reasons.
With regard to the global human rights situation, his delegation deplored the misuse of human rights instruments for political purposes,especially as a means of exerting pressure on weaker States.
For the weaker States, there may be no better military alternative than postures of deterrence by denial, geared exclusively to the defence of home territory, raising the costs of aggression as much as possible.
While globalization andtrade liberalization have benefited strong economies, they have also exposed weaker States to marginalization from the world economy.
But in some weaker States-- e.g., where severe inequalities occur among different groups in society, for example on ethnic grounds-- political violence within and between States may become more likely.
On the other hand, the view was expressed that a voluntary third-party dispute settlement system was indispensable to weaker States under contemporary international law.
Stronger States found it effective in the defence of their rights, but weaker States could not have any reasonable expectation that their countermeasures would have any effect on more powerful States. .
Those criticisms include the assertions that the institution of diplomatic protection was discriminatory because only powerful States were able to use it against weaker States.
Huge and aggressive military arsenals are being built up by a few States-- often working in collaboration-- while weaker States are often coerced to disarm and give up the potential for the development of any credible means of self-defence.
Yet, the report spells out so-called criteria for the authorization of force that are subjective and that could be misused,mostly by powerful States against weaker States.
It was further observed that, while stronger States could effectively resort to countermeasures, i.e.,take the law into their own hands, in the defence of their rights, weaker States could not have any reasonable expectation that their countermeasures would have any effect on more powerful States. .
His delegation agreed with the Nordic States that third-party dispute settlement procedures were a sine qua non in modern international law andan indispensable protection for small and weaker States.