Примеры использования Wording of this provision на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The wording of this provision is infelicitous.
The experts agreed with the wording of this provision.
In this case the wording of this provision would have to be supplemented accordingly.
Further consideration could be given to the wording of this provision.
Although it is true that the wording of this provision is ambiguous; See paras. 108 et seq. above.
There was agreement among the experts regarding the wording of this provision.
The new wording of this provision is due to be approved at the sixtieth session of the Danube Commission in April 2002.
To abandon the changes to the procedure before the Constitutional Chamber in Article 97 andretain the current wording of this provision; par 64.
The wording of this provision draws from article 11 of the Water Convention and from article 13 of the ILC Draft.
However, doctrine and practice converge andagree that, contrary to the wording of this provision which may give rise to confusion, the Convention also applies to foreign nationals.
However, the wording of this provision could be improved to reflect more precisely the relevant provisions of the international instruments referred to.
In(i) of subparagraph(b)it was decided to replace the word"suspicion" by the word"ground" and to adjust the wording of this provision accordingly.
According to the wording of this provision, this also applies to cases when goods are apparently damaged and when the consignee does not require delivery.
Should Article 16 not mean a specific body, but rather merely all state bodies that are somehow involvedin recording personal data, then this should be specified in the wording of this provision.
The wording of this provision should be based on that of article 55 of the articles on responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts.
While some delegations expressed support for draft article F1 on the human rights obligations of the State of transit,some other delegations believed that the exact wording of this provision should be reconsidered.
The wording of this provision differs from draft article 6 insofar as it requires"substantial grounds for believing", which is not the case in draft article 6.
In clause 6, while the clarification that the direct victims in question are the victims of“violations of human rights and international humanitarian law” does not constitute a major change,it is an improvement over the previous wording of this provision.
The wording of this provision in the PRTR Protocol is slightly different than the wording of the Aarhus Convention and it provides broader ground for confidentiality.
The members of the Commission, including the Special Rapporteur, were, however,inclined to abandon that categorical approach in favour of a simple presumption in order to bring the wording of this provision more into line with the Court's Advisory Opinion of 1951, which stated.
With regard to a request pertaining to a crime under: The final wording of this provision, as well as that of the whole article, depends on which crimes are ultimately included under the jurisdiction of the Court.
Thus, notwithstanding the less-than-Cartesian logic of article 20 of the 1978 Vienna Convention, whose rules are based on considerations of principle that are hard to reconcile or in any case different(succession and/but sovereignty),and despite the criticisms that may be levelled against the specific wording of this provision, there is no good reason not to include it-- as a guideline-- in the Guide to Practice.
Moreover, the very wording of this provision is interpreted by the Parties in a differently, which in the absence of an explicit way of direct communication, its application causes problems with its practical enforcement.
The members of the Commission, including the Special Rapporteur, however,ultimately abandoned that categorical approach in favour of a simple presumption in order to bring the wording of this provision more into line with the 1951 advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice, which stated.
Finally, in respect of article 8(3), one court stated that“[t]he wording of this provision can also be understood in a way that contradictory conduct by a party bars that party from relying on a different meaning of its former conduct”.75.
The negative wording of this provision reflects the fact that it concerns an exception; in principle, no State may invoke a provision of its internal law regarding competence to conclude treaties with a view to declaring an agreement null and void.
By Act No. 54/2003, amending the General Penal Code, the wording of this provision was changed; the text now reads"lawful" instead of"correct" procedures; it was considered that the term"correct", applying to procedures, was too broad and did not state with sufficient clarity the standard to be used to establish whether a procedure was"correct" or not.
The wording of this provision is very different from that of article 3 of the Convention, which prohibits a State party from returning or expelling a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he/she"would be in danger" of being subjected to torture.
The Committee considered that the wording of this provision is clear in that it provides for a defence to be conducted in person"or" with legal assistance of one's own choosing, taking as its point of departure the right to conduct one's own defence.
The new wording of this procedure will put greater emphasis on the provision of information through telecommunication networks.