Примеры использования Working group's view на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In the Working Group's view, it follows from the above that.
As regards Additional Protocol II to the Geneva Conventions, one representative, after observing that the two Additional Protocols, although they had not been universally accepted, had been ratified by two thirds of all States and could soon be transformed into a customary source of international humanitarian law,expressed disagreement with the Working Group's view that Protocol II should not be listed in article 22 on the ground that it contained no provision concerning grave breaches.
In the Working Group's view, prison sentences should be excluded.
The Declaration on Human Rights Defenders contains a series of principles and rights that, in the Working Group's view, are based on human rights standards enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the Charter of the United Nations.
In the Working Group's view, the only period of detention that can be considered incommunicado was the two days following his arrest.
With regard to the questions posed by the Commission in paragraph 30 of the report,she endorsed the Working Group's view that the innocent victim should not participate in an inter-State dispute, although that should not affect the right of private individuals to have their losses compensated.
In the Working Group's view, where detentions in Switzerland are concerned, it is worthwhile to refer to the well-established jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights.
It follows in the Working Group's view that the restrictions in the case of Liu Xia cannot be justified either.
In the Working Group's view, such listing is not sufficient to rebut the genuine link between Mr. Tabarzadi's interview and opinion editorial and his subsequent arrest and detention.
His delegation agreed with the Working Group's view that it would be futile for the Commission to engage in harmonizing the various treaty clauses on the obligation to extradite or prosecute.
In the Working Group's view, these factors, even if they could have been attributed to Mr. Mvogo himself in any way, provide insufficient justification for his continued detention.
Mr. GRIFFITH(Australia) stressed that the Working Group's view had been that it would be appropriate for the model law to provide a better regime than that prevailing under the present domestic law of particular States.
In the Working Group's view, the principle of ne bis in idem constitutes one of the essential guarantees in criminal justice proceedings, an imperative of a public and fair trial.
Concerning the topic of unilateral acts of States,he shared the Working Group's view that work on the codification and progressive development of the applicable legal rules was advisable and feasible, bearing in mind that States increasingly carried out unilateral acts with the intent to produce legal effects, and that the rule of law could be strengthened by an attempt to clarify the functioning of those kinds of acts and what the legal consequences were.
In the Working Group's view, Mr. Chen was deprived of his liberty for peacefully exercising his right to freedom of opinion and expression, as guaranteed under article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
It also supported the Working Group's view that organizations established under municipal law and non-governmental organizations should be excluded from the study of the topic.
In the Working Group's view, Liu Xianbin was deprived of his liberty for having peacefully exercised his right to freedom of opinion and expression, as guaranteed under article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Ms. Patel conveyed the Working Group's view that an international convention was the most efficient solution to the challenge of regulating PMSCs, while noting that she is not committed to a particular text.
In the Working Group's view, measures such as facilitating the tasks of associations by public funding or allowing tax exemptions for funding received from outside the country, fall within the scope of the positive obligation under article 22 of the Covenant.
In the Working Group's view, the information provided by the source provides sufficient grounds for the Working Group to conclude that there has been a violation of the right to a fair trial guaranteed under article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
In the Working Group's view, statements such as"Rwandans have spent 15 years in a coma","the war between Kagame's regime and the population" or"Kagame in difficult times" cannot be regarded as establishing a sufficient causal link to endangering national security.
In the Working Group's view, it is not possible to determine whether the arrest warrant was issued before or after the deprivation of liberty; nevertheless it is reasonable to think that the warrant might have been ordered as a result of the very statements that the defendant was making at that moment.
In the Working Group's view, the current deprivation of liberty of the above-mentioned seven persons amounts to arbitrary detention. Their detention violates the guarantees afforded by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights with respect to the right not to be arbitrarily deprived of liberty.
In the Working Group's view, there is no doubt that the detention of Mr. Gallardo Martínez during this 10-day period is arbitrary under category I of the categories applied by the Working Group in determining the arbitrariness of cases of detention.
In the Working Group's view, due to these facts of non-observance of the right to fair trial, as provided for in article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the case falls into category III of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group. .
In the Working Group's view, due to these facts of non-observance of the right to fair trial, as provided for in article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the case also falls into category III of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases submitted to the Working Group. .
It shared the Working Group's view that crimes such as aggression, which was not defined by treaty and could not, therefore, be included in article 22, and genocide, in the case of(Ms. Ariffin, Malaysia) States not parties to the Genocide Convention, should not, for those reasons, be excluded from the court's jurisdiction.
The Joint Meeting endorsed the Working Group's view that the United Nations requirements for the construction of portable tanks(Chapter 6.6 of the United Nations Model Regulations) did not need to be reproduced in RID/ADR and that it would suffice to refer to them or to indicate, where appropriate, the corresponding requirements of the IMDG Code.
The Committee endorsed the working group's view that the enactment of appropriate legislation, its implementation and enforcement were the three key issues on the basis of which a member State's performance could be measured with respect to its treaty obligations and the overall aim and 10 supporting objectives of the audit scheme.
Consequently, Slovenia did not agree with the Working Group's view that article 22 should not include Protocol II of 1977 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions because that Protocol contained no provision concerning grave breaches, since Part II of that Protocol did contain very clear provisions concerning acts which could be characterized as serious violations of humanitarian law.