Примеры использования Working group agreed that draft на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Working Group agreed that draft recommendation 2 should be deleted.
It was further suggested that it might be necessary to elaborate on the reference to"reliability" in subparagraph(b)(i)in the broader context of the general reliability standard set forth in draft article 11 of Option C. After discussion, the Working Group agreed that draft article 9 should be retained in its current form, subject to the changes mentioned above.
The Working Group agreed that draft article 14 was generally acceptable.
It was also decided that the opening words indraft articles 27 and 28, as well as draft article 29 as a whole(with the exception of the opening words which could be deleted; see para. 160), should remain in square brackets, pending final determination of the issue of the scope of chapter V. Furthermore, the Working Group agreed that draft articles 30 and 31 raised questions that would need to be discussed further and decided that those provisions too should be placed within square brackets.
The Working Group agreed that draft recommendations 213 and 214 could be deleted.
After discussion, the Working Group agreed that draft article 19 should be revised as follows.
The Working Group agreed that draft recommendation 1 should be revised to clarify the possibility of group members filing separate applications with a joint purpose.
After discussion, the Working Group agreed that draft recommendation 18 should focus on the behaviour of the group as a single entity.
The Working Group agreed that draft article 24 should be approved as drafted. .
Subject to that change, the Working Group agreed that draft article 8 should be retained in its current form for further consideration.
The Working Group agreed that draft article 7 should be retained in its current form.
The Working Group agreed that draft paragraph 4 should be adopted as drafted.
The Working Group agreed that draft articles 1(10) and 33 should be approved as drafted. .
The Working Group agreed that draft paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 should be approved as drafted. .
The Working Group agreed that draft paragraph 6 had become redundant, in view of its deliberations on draft paragraph 1, and agreed to delete it.
The Working Group agreed that draft recommendation 8 was acceptable in light of the definition of joint administration and of the additional explanations referred to above.
After discussion, the Working Group agreed that draft recommendation 4 should be revised, with the Secretariat requested to provide optional texts for consideration at a future session.
The Working Group agreed that draft decisions establishing separate rules of procedure and a separate compliance review mechanism for the Protocol should be prepared in advance of its third meeting.
After discussion, the Working Group agreed that draft recommendation 14 should be retained with the words"related persons in an enterprise group context" being replaced with the words"enterprise group members.
After discussion, the Working Group agreed that draft recommendation 5 should be considered together with draft recommendation 6 and in the light of revisions agreed to draft recommendation 1.
Delivery The Working Group agreed that draft articles 10 and 11, which established minimum standards on possession and delivery requirements, were generally acceptable, subject to its discussion of draft articles 17 and 19, which dealt with the notions of control and transfer of control.
After discussion, the Working Group agreed that draft recommendation 20 should be simplified to provide that in the event substantive consolidation was ordered, a single or first meeting of creditors(where such a meeting was required under the insolvency law) might be convened.
The Working Group agreed that draft articles 10, 11 and 12 would need to be considered together at a future meeting to ensure that obligations imposed upon certification authorities corresponded with the liability rules established by the Uniform Rules and to ensure that issues of party autonomy were properly resolved.
After discussion, the Working Group agreed that draft article 10(3)(a) of Option B could read along the following lines:"the criteria for assessing integrity shall be whether information contained in the electronic transferable record, including any[authorized] change that arises throughout the life cycle of the electronic transferable record, has remained complete and unaltered.
The Working Group agreed that draft articles 40(5), 42(3) and 43(3), which dealt with the effects of declarations, of the entry into force and of the denunciation of the draft Convention on rights of third parties, on transactions existing before the entry into force of the draft Convention and on transactions existing before denunciation respectively should be retained within square brackets for States to consider in their preparation for the next Commission session.
The Working Group agreed that the draft text contained in paragraph 34 above was acceptable and should be retained.
The Working Group agreed that the draft recommendation should end with the words"as part of the record of the proceedings", with the remaining text deleted.
In addition, the Working Group agreed that the draft Registry Guide should be finalized and submitted to the Commission for adoption at its forty-sixth session in 2013 A/CN.9/743, para. 73.
In that context, the Working Group agreed that the draft provision might need to be further discussed at a later stage with a view to verify its consistency with the Model Law.
The Working Group agreed that the draft model provision should be placed after draft model provision 50 and that its title should be changed to"other disputes.