Примеры использования Working group recalls на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Working Group recalls the pending invitation and requests that the invitation be extended.
To resolve this issue as objectively as possible, the Working Group recalls the following.
The Working Group recalls that in its general comment No. 32(2007), the Human Rights Committee stated that.
In the same spirit of focus and comprehensiveness, the Working Group recalls the issues listed in that paragraph.
The Working Group recalls the general allegation issued in the 2006 annual report concerning amnesty laws.
To this end, the Working Group recalls its opinion No. 25/2007(Australia), regarding health conditions of detainees.
The Working Group recalls that the Government has explained the factual basis for the charges see paragraphs 19-31 above.
In this context, the Working Group recalls the universal validity of the fundamental principle of presumption of innocence.
The Working Group recalls the obligation of States to protect all groups in situations of vulnerability.
In this regard, the Working Group recalls the provisions of article 15 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The Working Group recalls that psychiatric detention shall not be used to jeopardize someone's freedom of expression.
In that respect, the Working Group recalls that there shall not be special amnesties granted for enforced disappearances.
The Working Group recalls the guidelines contained in paragraphs 2 and 8(c) of the Working Group's general comment on article 18 of the Declaration.
While thanking the Government for its responses to two of those communications, the Working Group recalls article 13 of the Declaration which provides that steps shall be taken to ensure that all involved in the investigation, including the complainant, counsel, witnesses and those conducting the investigation, are protected against ill-treatment, intimidation or reprisal.
The Working Group recalls that under international human rights law, detention in custody of persons awaiting trial is to be the exception rather than the rule.
While thanking the Government for its responses to two of the communications, the Working Group recalls article 13, paragraph 3, of the Declaration, which provides that steps shall be taken to ensure that all involved in the investigation of an enforced disappearance, including the complainant, counsel, witnesses and those conducting the investigation, are protected against ill-treatment, intimidation or reprisal.
The Working Group recalls the obligation of States to consider alternatives to administrative custody from which foreigners can benefit.
The Working Group recalls its mandate as defined in paragraph 4 of resolution 1983/27, which states that the Working Group should perform the following functions.
The Working Group recalls that this is only one of several opinions of the Working Group finding Bahrain in violation of its international human rights obligations.
The Working Group recalls the principles that underlie the right to development, namely, equality, nondiscrimination, participation, transparency and accountability, as well as international cooperation.
The Working Group recalls its opinions No. 4/2012 and No. 47/2012(Democratic People's Republic of Korea), in which the Working Group held that the detention of the persons concerned was arbitrary.
The Working Group recalls the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action and the Outcome Document of the Durban Review Conference, as well as its relevant recommendations from all its previous sessions.
The Working Group recalls that its mandate was clarified and extended by the Commission on Human Rights in its resolution 1997/50 to cover the issue of administrative custody of asylum seekers and migrants.
The Working Group recalls that it had submitted to the Human Rights Council at its fifteenth session a possible draft convention for the regulation, monitoring and oversight of private military and security companies.
The Working Group recalls all relevant paragraphs of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action and the Outcome Document of the Durban Review Conference, in particular paragraphs 218 of the DDPA and 128 of the Outcome Document.
The Working Group recalls its Opinion No. 4/2012(Democratic People's Republic of Korea) concerning Ms. Shin Sook Ja, Ms. Oh Hae Won and Ms. Oh Kyu Won in which the Working Group held that their detention was arbitrary.
Furthermore, the Working Group recalls that international human rights law provides for a number of rights specific to persons deprived of their liberty on the ground of suspicion that they were involved in an offence.
The Working Group recalls that the Human Rights Council in its resolution 7/12 requested the Working Group to apply a gender perspective in its work, including in collecting information and in formulating recommendations.
The Working Group recalls the Human Rights Council's reaffirmation that States must ensure that any national laws and measures taken to combat terrorism comply with all their obligations under international law, in particular international human rights law.
The Working Group recalls paragraph 3 of article 13 of the Declaration, which provides that"steps shall be taken to ensure that all involved in the investigation, including the complainant, counsel, witnesses and those conducting the investigation, are protected against ill-treatment, intimidation or reprisal.