Примеры использования Would not constitute a breach на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Accordingly, the Committee concludes that their removal would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
That would not constitute a breach of any procedural rule, but simply a departure from the usual practice of prior consideration during the informal consultations.
Accordingly, the Committee concludes that her removal to Turkey would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
In the light of the above, the Committee against Torture, acting under article 22, paragraph 7, of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment,concludes that the decision of the State Party to return the complainant to Uzbekistan would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee found that her removal to China by the State party would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee against Torture, acting under article 22, paragraph 7, of the Convention,concludes that the complainant's removal to Lebanon by the State party would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee therefore concludes that their removal to that country would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
In the light of the above, the Committee against Torture, acting under article 22, paragraph 7 of the Convention,concludes that the decision of the State party to return the complainant to Ethiopia would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee therefore concludes that their removal to that country would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
Accordingly, the Committee against Torture, acting under article 22, paragraph 7, of the Convention,concludes that the complainant's removal to Pakistan by the State party would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee therefore concludes that his removal to that country would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
In the light of the above, the Committee against Torture, acting under article 22, paragraph 7 of the Convention, concludes that the decision of the State party to return the complainant andher family to El Salvador would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
Therefore, the decision of the State party to return the complainant to Ethiopia would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee against Torture, acting under article 22, paragraph 7, of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment,concludes that the removal of the complainant to Iran would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
Accordingly, the Committee concluded that the complainant's removal to that country would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee against Torture, acting under article 22, paragraph 7, of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment,concludes that the removal of the complainant to Iran would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee considered that the complainant's deportation to the Congo orto Côte d'Ivoire would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee against Torture, acting under article 22, paragraph 7, of the Convention,concludes that the complainants' removal to Sri Lanka by the State party would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
For these reasons,the Committee concludes that the complainant's removal to Lebanon would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee against Torture, acting under article 22, paragraph 7, of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment,concludes that the removal of the complainant to Turkey would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee concluded that the complainant's removal to the United Republic of Tanzania would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee against Torture, acting under article 22, paragraph 7, of the Convention,concludes that the removal of the complainant to Bangladesh would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
Accordingly, the Committee concluded that the decision of the State party to return the complainant to Libya would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee thus concluded that the State party's decision to return the complainant to Togo would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
In the light of the above considerations,the Committee concluded that the complainant's removal to Turkey would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
Accordingly, the Committee concluded that the decision of the State party to return the complainant to Ethiopia would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
In light of this, inter alia,the Committee concluded that the removal of the complainant to Azerbaijan in that case would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
It concluded that the complainant's removal, andthat of his family whose claim is dependent upon his, to that country would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee against Torture, acting under article 22, paragraph 7, of the Convention,concludes that the removal of the complainant to Iran would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.
The Committee against Torture, acting under article 22, paragraph 7, of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment,concludes that the deportation of the complainants to Algeria would not constitute a breach of article 3 of the Convention.