Приклади вживання Dissenting opinion Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Supreme Court- Dissenting Opinion.
Partly dissenting opinion of judge pinto de albuquerque.
ARB/03/4, Decision on Annulment, Dissenting Opinion, para. 14.
In his dissenting opinion Judge Martens makes that point very persuasively, and I agree with him.
The Unified State Register of Court Decisions contains dissenting opinions of judges as well.
The judge's dissenting opinion must be prepared within the time not exceeding five days from the day of delivery of the decision, that is of the day of its preparation in complete form.
The act of the specialinvestigation is signed with subject to a proviso“see dissenting opinion”.
What if he goes out of his way to quell any dissenting opinion so as to cover over his lie.
At trial, the prosecutor himself, a former front-line soldier, dropped the charges,and lay assessors wrote a dissenting opinion.
As to the first of these questions, I refer to the joint dissenting opinion of myself and a number of my colleagues.
While only the majority opinion is considered precedential,an outvoted judge can still publish a dissenting opinion.
In addition to fighting with cities that have a“dissenting opinion”, Trump ordered to strengthen the struggle with migrants in fact.
We have decided to free all the people imprisoned for their ideas,their beliefs or for having expressed dissenting opinions,” said Ghannouchi.
The right of a member of the disciplinary chamber to express a dissenting opinion in the decision and its respective publication along with the text of the decision;
I regret this all the more because, generally speaking, it is my conviction that itenhances the Court's authority if the right to express a dissenting opinion is used rather reticently.
However, some judges of the Supreme Court of Ukraine in the dissenting opinions presented logical objections to the legal position stated in the above resolutions.
The dissenting opinion stresses the inadmissibility and illegality of the corresponding actions, taking into account the complexity of the concept«implementation of a suspicion report».
They know that an effective decisionis always a judgment based on"dissenting opinions" rather than on"consensus on the facts.".
Unfortunately, the procedural law sets forth the duty of courts to take into account only the conclusions stated in resolutions of the Supreme Court of Ukraine,rather than those made by the judges in dissenting opinions.
On the other hand thisallows them to formulate arguments why they think the dissenting opinion is tenable and acceptable(acceptance-component of tolerance).
The Judge of the Constitutional Court of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika who disagrees with the decision of the Constitutional Court of thePridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika may state his dissenting opinion in writing.
The judge of the Constitutional Court disagreed on the decision of theConstitutional Court is entitled to express a dissenting opinion in writing and append it to the minutes of the Constitutional Court sessions.
It seems that the interpretation of the aforementioned norms set forth in a dissenting opinion may lead to the harmonization of law enforcement practice on notification of suspicion not only to Judges, but also to other persons specified in Article 481 of the CPC(lawyers, deputies of local councils, people's deputies).
Moreover, the UK police launched a project in which theAI will do about the same as in the film“Dissenting opinion”- to identify offenders before they broke the law.
Judges in the course of a trial represent the court as an institution and the judgement represents Ukraine and one of its courts and there is really no need or reason to allow judges who found themselves in theminority when deciding on a case to write their dissenting opinion, as mentioned in Article 429/2.
Language around the military incursion was heavily policed,and hundreds of people who expressed their dissenting opinions about Turkey's military operation were rounded up and are facing investigations under anti-terrorism laws.”.
Soon after, another thought leader, Albert Jan van den Berg,alleged that party-appointed arbitrators nearly always issue a dissenting opinion when the appointing party loses a case.[2].
In so far as the Government referred to the Constitutional Court's judgment of 30 August 2000,the applicant referred to the dissenting opinion signed by three of the seven judges who had examined the case and found that the restriction was disproportionate.